General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou know I couldn't care less if Mitt Romney is Mormon.
I've known a lot of nice Mormon people in my lifetime. As long as their beliefs don't interfere with mine, I'm okay with it. What I do object to is that he's a Republican liar and a billionaire unsympathetic to the plight of others and that includes the cruel and heartless treatment of his dog. Actually his actions are contrary to Mormon beliefs of helping one's fellow man.
It's time to stop making religion a wedge issue in our selection of leaders for our country. It distracts from the real problems we should be having with the candidates. John Kennedy managed to be President without once needing the Vatican to help him out. Jimmy Carter, an Evangelist still was able to govern without blowing up Iran during the hostage crisis. Of course they were Democrats.
George Bush, who was surrounded by wacky religious nut graduates of Bob Jones University, did allow them too much entry into government, but even he got them to back off when they wandered off page from the Heritage Foundation global oil policies of perpetual war that he and Dicky were trying to put in motion.
Religion should be the least of our worries about candidates unless they decide to declare themselves god kings or pharoahs, then we should worry.
dimbear
(6,271 posts)its repression of women, minorities, and the LGBT community. He is the very public face of the LDS church.
Politics is like a street fight. Want a president who doesn't go there? President Kerry would be your guy.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)same powerful position that a bishop in the Catholic Church would be. It's really middle management in a retail sort of way, like Amway.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)associated with those terms. One can not have it both ways. The Mormons should have just stuck with their titles that sound as if they were made up by 8 yr old boys in a treehouse. Ex: First President.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)It's a very small cell of believers in his community. Really, it's more like being the captain of the neighborhood watch.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)Oh...the LDS thanks you for all of your hard work.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)But Mittens is a robotic lying sack of shit one-percenter.
Fuck you, Mitt.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)stevedeshazer
(21,653 posts)I also have LDS friends. Nice folks. I don't agree with them any more than I do with Catholics, Baptists or Republicans.
No offense to any liberals in those groups about religion, but...
There should be no religious litmus test.
Religion is religion. Government is government.
E Pluribus Unum.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I don't find that a deal breaker either. He still would be a fine President. We might just have a real Muslim President one of these days if we can evolve beyond our racism and bigotry.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts).. in imaginary friends.. which seems to be a pre-requisite for offices higher than dog catcher in this country.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)and I think he will, it wouldn't worry me. It's the economic policies that he will bring that I object to.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)I see Santorum being cut from the same mold as Dubya, religion-wise.
Mittens? You're right, his economic policies would kill us, not his magic underwear.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)He is truly an orthodox believer in Catholicism and is a moron. I shudder what Santorum would do to women's rights and programs for the poor. Catholics will take care of the poor, but I fear Santorum would prop up the church on this and no one else.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts).. since there's an apparent disconnect between the orthodoxy of the catholic church and what most of its members believe / practice.
Your average catholic is a hell of a lot different than the church.
demosincebirth
(12,529 posts)All men of faith.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)But no, I shake my head at our candidates professing faith to either pander to like-minded elements of the electorate, or to appear that way to not be a target of their wrath.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)to oppose my community's rights, when we do them no harm at all. I do not see that calling their organization a 'church' means anything to me, as all I see is folks who willingly join a group that does harm to others who did no harm to them. If that is what religion is, then religion is not a good thing.
Carter was at the time of his Presidency, Southern Baptist. He left that denomination due to their history and current treatment of minorities, in particular African Americans. Just saying. Mitt was high up in his church and past 30 years old when they stopped preaching that African Americans are inferior, a teaching which their founder said 'would always remain true'.....nothing wrong with that, I guess. Nice people do that sort of thing. I guess....
No, sorry. It matters to me when folks join a hate group. It just does.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)how it operates up close. In those states that religious organization has been able to acquire theocratic power in the governments of those states, so I know what you are talking about. However, many of the casinos in Nevada are run by Mormon corporations. Truly! And the sin, gambling and alcohol are very profitable for them so they don't interfere with it. They just don't want it in their own house. I believe a Mormon President would have that kind of hands off attitude. But my objection with him is about who he is and whose puppet he is. Even Mormon voters need to know what he stands for and if they get it, they will know he's not the guy for them. So the religion is not the problem.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)They are most certainly meddling in what goes on in MY house, not their own. So why you would think he'd not do in office what he already does is interesting to me.
And just fyi, I do not see gay as a sin like you suggest, dear. Do not equate my family to a casino or a cocktail, thank you kindly.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Church and State. They probably are also behind this birth control thing or maybe the Catholic Church is like they are at the bottom of the abortion debacle. All religions are dangerous if they are allowed in politics. Look what the evangelicals do to promote racism. But, this is a separate thing, a man who has a religion like most Presidential candidates have or claim to have is different from the religion.
I don't want Mittens in the White House, but it's not because of his religion. The Mormons can't take over Washington anymore than the Dominionists could during the Bush administration or the Catholics during the Kennedy administration. btw Kennedy was BFF with some very powerful cardinals in the church. So no, we can't condemn Romney for his religion, because it will distract from what is truly awful about him.
dimbear
(6,271 posts)and has been a missionary for them. He was a missionary for them at a time when he could conveniently escape serving in Viet Nam--a war which he cheered and demonstrated for. When questioned about the church he maintains a stony silence and claims or at least implies that he is persecuted for his beliefs. I call BS on that.
I usually don't indulge religious prejudices, but I'm declaring an exception for Bishop Romney. There's an old saying in some book somewhere: sow the wind, reap the whirlwind. Reap that, Mitt.
Ter
(4,281 posts)n/t
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Most rich people don't really know how much they have after the first hundred million.
Raine
(30,540 posts)she kept it to herself (only mentioned it in passing) and never prostelatized (sp?). If Rmoney is like that fine ... as long as he doesn't ram it down everyone's throat policy wise.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)So far the only proselytizing I have seen him do, is not his religion, but his motherfucking, awful right wing politics.
Zanzoobar
(894 posts)He's only a multi-millionaire. A quarter billion does not a billionaire make.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)it's not the truth.
Ter
(4,281 posts)I have never seen him called a billionaire once in the media. You're probably thinking of Bloomberg or maybe Trump.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)It's what I have heard on TV and radio while I go about my business. But if you say not, okay.
Zanzoobar
(894 posts)To me, the difference between a multi-millionaire and a billionaire is an RCH.
Ter
(4,281 posts)I just never heard it and was curious.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)They were a great crew to work with and never was there an attempt by anybody to proselytize. That said, I do believe that Prop 8 made it plain that the church is not shy about involving itself politically. It's a factor, even if relatively small next to Roofdog's economic and foreign policy positions.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)a more helpful and kind group of people to find yourself in the midst of when strangers in a strange land so to speak need help. They really helped me out and I will never forget their kindness. But that being said, yes I feel the power brokers in that church like in all churches need watching. The point of my post though was that we can't judge our presidential candidates by their religion. They might try to bring their religion to Washington with them, but it really doesn't work out for them, so it's the least thing we need to fear from them. We need to concentrate on what they really stand for and in Romney's case his religion is the least problem there is about him.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)And that applies to Harry Reid just as much as it applies to Mittens.
They essentially control Utah with an iron fist, already.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)his religion in politics? I can't see anything in his record. You know even Mormons or Catholics or Jews or Protestants or Muslims or Buddhists or Faery Lovers like me, all need some representation. That's what democracy is about.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)That certainly seems to be a Mormon value.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)A politician's loyalties have little to do with his religion.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)As mayor, Anderson rose to nationwide prominence as a champion of several national and international causes, including climate protection, immigration reform, restorative criminal justice, GLBT rights, and an end to the "war on drugs". Before and after the invasion by the U.S. of Iraq in 2003, Anderson was a leading opponent of the invasion and occupation of Iraq and related human rights abuses. Anderson was the only mayor of a major U.S. city who advocated for the impeachment of President George W. Bush, which he did in many venues throughout the United States.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)unkachuck
(6,295 posts)....any Mormons personally, only the ones that knock on my door....I find them a little creepy....but you're right about slick willard, the rich wall-street Mormon,
"...he's a Republican liar and a billionaire unsympathetic to the plight of others..."
....that's his big sin and the reason he should never become president....
Cleita
(75,480 posts)It isn't his religion we should be worried about. Also, it's true that any church will try to establish themselves as a theocracy if allowed to. Can't just blame the Mormons about this in Utah. There are plenty of places in the South that are totally ruled by the dominant church cult there. I have had the opportunity to travel and spend time in many places in this country and have observed what is going on.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)I will cease to use his religion as a wedge issue against him.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)most of the wars and genocides of history are because of religion and neither side wanting to give up because they think they have some divine right telling them they are the good guys.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)And the Republican Party is going to continue to use religion as a wedge issue whether Mitt Romney's religion is used against him or not.
Furthermore, this isn't really a case of neither side giving up. Democrats seldom attack their opponents using religion or culture war issues, because it doesn't work. Ever hear of Alex Sanders? If you haven't, he's the guy who tried to get elected to the US Senate from South Carolina by implying that Lindsey Graham was gay. Didn't work out so well for him. Seemed to work wonders when George W Bush did it to Ann Richards, though.
However, this year you may have an anecdotal example of where the Republican Party's decision to try and demean those who aren't of the same faith as the majority, may actually come back to bite them in the ass. And if that is the case, it will probably be a long time before the Republican Party nominates another Mormon.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)party as the DLC) play dirty. Remember the Mayberry Machiavellians? They are still alive and well and active, but now we know the Koch brothers are part of that cabal. Yes, they did a number on Ann Richards, however, this will backfire on us if we do it. There are a lot of Mormons in the western USA. They can distinguish between assholes within their enclave and okay guys. If you attack them they will rally behind Romney, which from what I understand, a lot of them don't like him for the same reasons we don't.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)They make up 2% of the vote in Colorado and 4% in Arizona. Nevada has the biggest LDS population of the potential western swing states with 11%. Most of those are probably not up for grabs though, as Mormons tend to vote overwhelmingly Republican.
If Obama had to answer stupid questions about why Reverand Wright is pissed off at America (hint: look at the way we treated black people 1960's), then Romney should have to answer stupid questions about why his church baptizes dead people.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)overpopulated with Mormons and they do get two senators just like California and New York. I wish our MSM would ask those questions about why his church baptizes dead people, but they don't so are the Mormons at fault for this? Or, maybe the corporate media who are trying to get a Republican into the White House again, no matter who it is. When you pick on candidate for who they are rather than what they stand for, you are in trouble. You know that all the feces being slung at Obama because he's black (who he is) isn't going anywhere. This won't either.