Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:42 PM Jul 2014

Go home SCOTUS You are drunk

Handy Links & Talking Points for Arguing About Hobby Lobby Case

[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]


If you're anything like me, the last 36 hours or so have been filled with rage, tears, and yelling obscenities at the Supreme Court over it's appalling ruling allowing employers to refuse to provide health insurance coverage for some forms of birth control. This blatantly sexist travesty was compounded this morning when SCOTUS clarified that the decision is not limited to the four types of contraception specified in the Hobby Lobby case, but extends to ALL methods of birth control.

In light of the number of times I've have had to engage in debate with friends, family members, coworkers and random people on the internet as to why the Hobby Lobby ruling is terrible for women, I've compiled a list of the most frequent arguments I've heard in support of the decision and some (hopefully!) handy links and talking points refuting said arguments.

1. Should the government be able to force companies to pay for something that goes against their religious beliefs? What about their right to religious liberty?

On one level, this all stems from the Citizens United ruling. This is the infamous case in which the Court held that corporations are 'people'. There are obviously a number of real, substantial, non-trivial differences between a person and a corporation, including but not limited to the fact that an actual human being can: A.) die, as opposed to going out of business; b.) go to jail if they commit a crime, as opposed to, you know, banks and Wall Street firms that are "too big to fail" or completely unaccountable; etc. Many people, myself included, do not believe that corporations should be considered 'people' under the law. SCOTUS (well, at least 5 of them) and I disagree bitterly on this point. So, my to answer the question of "should the government be able to force companies to pay for something that goes against their religious beliefs?" is that yes, I think that the government should have that power.

Read More:http://powderroom.jezebel.com/handy-links-talking-points-for-arguing-about-hobby-lo-1598812424/+burtreynoldsismyspiritguide1
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Go home SCOTUS You are drunk (Original Post) sheshe2 Jul 2014 OP
More like go drunk SCOTUS, you are home. JaneyVee Jul 2014 #1
Drunk on their filthy sociopathic power for life, she! :( Thank you for these factual talking Cha Jul 2014 #2
I hate the "five" Cha. sheshe2 Jul 2014 #5
Based on their drunken power. Cha Jul 2014 #7
More like Scrotus. Warren DeMontague Jul 2014 #3
Exactly Warren! sheshe2 Jul 2014 #6
oh yeah Hekate Jul 2014 #8
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #4
A company cannot HAVE religious beliefs. It's not human and certainly not a person. Shrike47 Jul 2014 #9
4 out of the 9 people in that pic don't belong. nt Jamaal510 Jul 2014 #10
Thanks for the links. William769 Jul 2014 #11
I took a peek in the hosts forum.... sheshe2 Jul 2014 #12

Cha

(297,154 posts)
2. Drunk on their filthy sociopathic power for life, she! :( Thank you for these factual talking
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:59 PM
Jul 2014

points against HobLob Decision.

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
5. I hate the "five" Cha.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:07 PM
Jul 2014

From what I have read their decision is not even based on the law.



Cha, we need it.

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
9. A company cannot HAVE religious beliefs. It's not human and certainly not a person.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:41 PM
Jul 2014

Constitutional amendment.

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
12. I took a peek in the hosts forum....
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:04 AM
Jul 2014

Yes, you have been busy. As for your OPs today. Magnificent.

The links...you are welcome William. Sigh~ We will continue the fight, sad that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Go home SCOTUS You are dr...