General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaybe we should stop calling it 'birth control'
Amanda Marcotte @AmandaMarcotte
Maybe we should stop calling it "birth control" and calling it "child support prevention". If it's for *men*, well, then it's untouchable.
http://whatwouldjackdo.net/events/2014/07/maybe-we-should-stop-calling.html
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)It is hormone control medicine.
It corrects various irregularities as well.
It is used to prevent cysts and abnormal menstruation.
That bastards from HL never seem to think of what else those are used for.
IronLionZion
(45,418 posts)they just don't care.
Medical experts testified on exactly that during the multiple court cases.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)I actually didn't know about that part of it till about 5 years ago.
Which brings me to the realization that many guys don't know about that part.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)it's because they don't want to.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)I mean, I've always supported the right to choose, I just didn't know that aspect till much more recently.
It is not an excuse, and all I am saying is that, with how things are, that is buried so deep in the conversation that many don't even see it. Which really sucks. I think it needs to be mentioned and promoted more heavily.
They stop at the birth control aspect of it and don't go beyond it, and this is not just men, there are some women too that don't even think about that.
Heck, my mother doesn't, and I tried to explain that to her and she wouldn't hear it.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)it just makes me mad that so many stay willing stupid, you found out and added new information. Others reject anything that doesn't support their world view.
It very frustrating.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Don't know if that is still indicated, but I remember in High School - we got excited the first time we saw a pimple because it made getting BC pills a snap.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)MuseRider
(34,104 posts)Sad but true.
conservaphobe
(1,284 posts)The way some men talk, you'd think human beings are asexual reproducers.
marble falls
(57,073 posts)calimary
(81,198 posts)Glad you're here! Maybe they're like george will and his "lovely" pronouncements about rape and rape victims (which RIGHTFULLY should have gotten him yanked off the air and should have cost him his nationally-syndicated column). But, then again, I guess one has to understand. People who hold points of view as idiotic as his obviously have their heads so far up their descending colons that it's inevitable some of that is gonna come bubbling up out of their mouths at some point.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)They're like a bunch of wannabe Saint Pauls.
WhiteTara
(29,701 posts)Nice good ole fashioned mechanistic language.
libodem
(19,288 posts)Oh, yeah, baby. That's the ticket!
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)There you go!
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Mariana
(14,854 posts)They believe these forms of birth control cause abortions.
There's a real effort going on among some religious leaders to convince people that most forms of birth control = abortion. So, you have people thinking RU-486 and Plan B are exactly the same thing and work in exactly the same way. You even have some people believing that ordinary birth control pills work by "aborting" a fertilized egg every month. It's insane.
csziggy
(34,135 posts)By their logic it shouldn't.
During the selection and transfer phases many embryos may be discarded in favour of others. This selection may be based on criteria such as handicaps, genetic disorders, or even simply sex.[96] This is a question of ethics as no consensus exists in science, religion, and philosophy on when during the development of a human embryo, it should be recognized as a new person. For those who believe that this is at the moment of conception, IVF becomes a moral question when multiple eggs are fertilised, begin development, and only a few are chosen for implantation.
If IVF were to involve the fertilisation of only a single egg, or at least only an amount that will be implanted, then this would not be an issue. However, this has the chance of increasing costs dramatically as only a few eggs can be attempted at a time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro_fertilisation#Discarding_unwanted_embryos
Just below that section, there is a discussion of various religions doctrine for IVF - I hadn't realized that the Roman Catholic Church totally banned it.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)Religious beliefs aren't logical by definition.
liberalla
(9,234 posts)"Religious beliefs aren't logical by definition."
Wow. Therein lies the problem. So simple and concise it hurts or it heals.
LOGIC... try some today!
madokie
(51,076 posts)SomeGuyInEagan
(1,515 posts)... or something worse.
Seriously sick of this shit. Let's get this stuff done and over with before my eight-year-old daughter has to fight the same damn fight in ten years, again in twenty, again in thirty and so forth.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)DesertDiamond
(1,616 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)there is one = My Account, click on it
there will be an option
Social media tabs on threads (Twitter, Google+, Facebook) Display | Remove
you want to display those and then click the FB option, I think is how it works.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)NJCher
(35,650 posts)What some of these societies (without the U.S.-style rightwing influence) come up with!
Cher
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)Cuz...that's what they are. (And we didn't even need "Fuck You, Frank" Luntz to do a focus group for that one.)
But no, we need to be pushed around by a tiny minority of (mostly) hypocrites who want to have their moral cake and eat it, too.
randome
(34,845 posts)"Did you take your POM, honey?"
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Sometimes it seems like the only purpose in life is to keep your car from touching another's.[/center][/font][hr]
Freddie
(9,259 posts)As in, when ***I*** control whether, when, and how many children I will bear, I control my life.
This, and nothing else, is what they find objectionable.
wiggs
(7,811 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Kicked for truth.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Nevermind that religious freedom ends at taking something from someone else.
Nevermind that the specified measures are not in any scientific sense "abortion."
Nevermind that abortion is a woman's right anyway.
This is simply healthcare that women need and men don't. So it gets screwed with, over and over. With the added ugly implication that it has something do with approving or disapproving of women's sex lives. Women's sex lives. Not men's. Because it's the woman sex that needs to be controlled and punished.
Health care. That's it.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)This.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)area51
(11,905 posts)it'd be covered.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Despite all their "concern" of minorities having abortions what Republicans KNOW is the majority of abortions are WHITE PEOPLE and they ALSO hear white people are becoming a minority. They believe blacks and Latinos are breeding like rabbits.
They believe outlawing abortions will keep the White Race in the majority.
valerief
(53,235 posts)handmade34
(22,756 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/meryl-branchmctiernan/a-pill-by-any-other-name_b_5550199.html
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/07/02/hobby-lobby-sex-lies-and-craft-supplies.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Fpolitics+(The+Daily+Beast+-+Politics)
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)He doesn't get this at all. He knows he would have gotten less sex over the years if it wasn't for birth control.
His conclusion is this is about power and control.
merrily
(45,251 posts)With a dash of the obsession about sex in general that seems rampant in the Catholic Church, which controlled Christianity and the content of the Bible for the longest time. Seriously, how is a vow of celibacy and poverty a realistic solution to controlling how priests may will their property? Did they ever really expect that celibacy was not going to be an issue?
Cha
(297,123 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)changed, sooner or later?
ninjanurse
(93 posts)It's recommended to space conception, at least 2 years for the best conditions for a healthy pregnancy. Contraception is not the opposite of motherhood, but a part of responsible health and family care. There are dire consequences to blocking access to contraception, I list some here-- http://www.emancipationconversation.com/2014/02/08/is-mike-huckabee-against-pre-natal-care/
olegramps
(8,200 posts)The Catholic hierarchy is the biggest pack of hypocrites that have ever graced the face of the earth. They have resorted to every legal tactic that they could employ to block access to thousands upon thousands of records detailing sexual abuse cases by the clergy.
While only a minimal number of their membership adheres to their condemnation of contraception they continue to use legal tactics to deny people access to contraceptive information and appropriate birth control even when it is prescribed for medical reason other than contraception. As a former Catholic, I have no damn use for Catholics that don't adhere to the Church's asinine teachings and continue to support this criminal enterprise with their donations and attendance. I won't give them the sweat off my ball if they were dying. Having a very close relative who was abused by these sanctimonious bastards I loath them and their attempt to control people.
When will the people revolt against these fascists assholes and put them out of business once and for all? Boycott Hobby Lobby!!!