General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKagan Takes Up Hunting with Fellow Justice Scalia
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpps/news/kagan-takes-up-hunting-with-fellow-justice-scalia-dpgonc-20120404-kh_19031801"He's made a huntress out of me," Kagan revealed at a Marquette law school panel in Milwaukee on Tuesday.
The liberal justice revealed she and her ideological foe had shot quail and pheasant together and planned to hunt bigger game in the future.
"He insists I'm going to shoot myself an antelope," the New York City native said, adding that she had come to view hunting as "really good fun."
Ha! That's great, isn't it? Two people from ideologically opposite ends of the spectrum, coming together to unnecessarily kill a third, completely unrelated thing.
PB
muntrv
(14,505 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Everyone in a hunting party needs to know the drill.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)...Cheney shot Harry Whittington.
Maybe Cheney, Kagan and Scalia can all go hunting together! They can bring along Dubya to retrieve the quail and pheasant. Man that's an image.
PB
hughee99
(16,113 posts)dhill926
(16,314 posts)what's next. Fox hunting? Hope they give the dead animals to the peasants.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)What's wrong with that?
dhill926
(16,314 posts)less privileged may actually eat the spoils. Hard to imagine the justices doing it for anything other than sport. And I do have a problem with that.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)I would be surprised if they shot some pheasants and no one ate them - they're pretty good eating, but you need to be careful when you chew. Bite down too hard on birdshot and you'll crack a tooth.
I don't kill anything I'm not going to eat when I'm hunting or fishing. No true sportsman would do otherwise.
Zanzoobar
(894 posts)Or the guide's staff.
They prolly ate the boids that very night in a simply prepared sauce.
teddy51
(3,491 posts)get alerted on, but it was tongue in cheek.
meow2u3
(24,759 posts)Tongue in cheek my ass!
teddy51
(3,491 posts)appal_jack
(3,813 posts)"Tongue in cheek my ass!" sounds like quite the proposition...
-app
enough
(13,255 posts)What's wrong with "hunter?"
Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)I just have a bad feeling.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)Response to 11 Bravo (Reply #33)
Post removed
snooper2
(30,151 posts)I FUCKIN HUMAN
I guess that's a lot better than-
I FUCKING GROUNDHOG - LOL
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)...self-defense. If the startled birds fly away from you, they're cowards and can be shot on principle.
PB
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)It's being in the woods on a nice day with friends and enjoying the outdoors. I don't measure the fun I've had by the number of animals I kill (but it is nice to go home with something). I really enjoyed an ice fishing trip with my hunting and fishing buddies a couple of months ago even though we caught nothing.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)and intending to kill an animal that's in its own habitat, doing its thing. I've heard it called "hiking".
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Once in a while, I'll take a shotgun with me and if I'm lucky, I'll bring home a bird or two for dinner. I do a lot of fishing and release most of what I catch, but sometimes I'll bring a few home for a meal. I see nothing wrong with that and offer no apology for it.
I can understand that hunting isn't for everyone and if it's not your thing, that's fine. What I do is not your concern and the snark is not appreciated.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)"I like to get out in the woods" is a really lame reason for blowing away an animal. If a hunter ever actually said "I just really enjoy killing defenseless animals", I'd be stunned by the honesty.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Discussing it further would be a waste of time, but have it your way. I'm very comfortable in my own skin.
unkachuck
(6,295 posts)....what other fat-tony vices has she come to view as "really good fun."
....our wonderful liberal justice is being tainted and corrupted by the fat fascist tony....first it's quail and pheasant, but that's not enough....to become a true right-wing huntress, she'll have to kill Bambi....
....no good can come from breaking bread and rubbing elbows with the right-wing....
saras
(6,670 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,628 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)...elitists enjoying themselves...touching isn't it?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)should reconsider her new hobby. Scalia might want to create a new opening on the court.
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Bizarre, actually. But then again, I would never consider hunting. Nor would I consider it great fun. And least of all would I consider going out in the woods alone with an armed Fat Tony.
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)Not that I care about Kagan hunting. Good on her. I live in the country.
But is this the image of a Supreme Court justice? And I'm not even talking about decorum.
I can't even imagine a sentient being in the USSC or environs who has NEVER heard of Scalia's famous duck hunt with Dick Cheney, and how that event is synonymous with corruption and/or influence peddling.
What is Kagan thinking? Or does a fraud like Scalia not bother her?
ParkieDem
(494 posts)Scalia must be some sort of charmer or have some great personality that hides his bizarro intellect.
It's common knowledge that he and Ginsburg are pretty close to best friends -- they and their spouses spend New Year's and holidays together, go to the opera/theater together, and all that.
321Morrow
(37 posts)At a certain point the animal deserves to go free.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)That's some Serious Bullshit. Even if it's true.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)At the time I couldn't find sourcing for the same story at CNN or some other mainstream media outlet other than a Fox affiliate.
PB
TheKentuckian
(25,020 posts)I'm pretty sure Kagan is pretty far off from Scalia's ideological opposite. I'm not sure if any Justice has been as far left is he is out on the Reich.
The framing of Kennedy as a "moderate" has been destructive but this frame is almost as dangerous because once a moderate is painted as far left this end of the spectrum is herded toward the aforementioned fucking Kennedy who really is much more "moderate" than a Rehnquist, he just is a hair less absurd than the four wild extremists that our chumps rolled over and confirmed when absolute obstruction was required to keep the country out of the toilet and as a side benefit, move them to the middle some and give us some latitude on the left.
All the "calculation" predictably turned to crap and not any combination of things accomplished in three decades of allowing a radical run to the right on the courts which is magnified by the volume of appointments stacked over the years was worth allowing these asses to scuttle the country for as long as they draw breath.
Bah!
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Twit.
theaocp
(4,233 posts)was whether this was a canned hunt or not. If so, it ain't fucking hunting. It's using birds as target practice. Go get some skeet, "hunters."
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Raine
(30,540 posts)cstanleytech
(26,236 posts)Just as long as they dont combine it with Dick Cheney and liquor they should be safe enough.
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)And representative of a classic bit of disconnect. You have tens of millions of Americans who hunt, many more than that who approve of and support it, and for a lot of people it's part of their survival. Even never once having hunted anything that was willing to leave me alone, I can appreciate that, and yet there are still a lot of people here who treat hunting as disgusting and evil.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)I'm not sure if you read the article but we're talking about recreation hunting here which includes, as Kagan adds, the ultimate goal of Scalia to get her to bag an antelope.
I'm not even sure that Kagan eats meat.
PB
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)His judging is what bothers me.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Or, someone...