Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,014 posts)
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 08:17 PM Jul 2014

Chris Christie Vetoes Gun Reform Bill Despite Pleas From Sandy Hook Parents

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/07/03/3456258/an-hour-after-sandy-hook-parent-pleas-chris-christie-vetoes-gun-reform-bill/

On Wednesday morning, parents of victims killed in the Sandy Hook massacre delivered a 55,000-signature petition to Gov. Chris Christie (R) imploring him to sign a modest gun reform law that would reduce the number of rounds permissible in gun magazines from 15 to 10. An hour later, Christie vetoed that bill, saying it was the “very embodiment of reform in name only.”

Christie sent the bill back as a “conditional veto” with calls to reform the mental health system, but his veto effectively killed the provision that would have limited the number of bullets in a magazine.

“[H]is statement accusing us of ‘grandstanding’ and furthering ‘empty rhetoric’ is a blow to the memories of our children,” said Nicole Hockley and Mark Barden, who both lost their first-grade sons during the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. “… If Governor Christie truly wants to make meaningful reform, then focusing on what actually works would include the mental health reforms he proposes PLUS the limitation on high capacity magazines.”

(end snip)

Christ Christie, man of the people. /sarcasm off.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chris Christie Vetoes Gun Reform Bill Despite Pleas From Sandy Hook Parents (Original Post) deminks Jul 2014 OP
If it is 'reform in name only' Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #1
Damn he's a cruel hoax. Cha Jul 2014 #2
This bill was a "Bridge too far". oneshooter Jul 2014 #3
he wouldn't meet with the parents of sandy hook massacre. he's the last thing america needs. spanone Jul 2014 #4
He Only Cares About His Career otohara Jul 2014 #5
Christie does something right for change. VScott Jul 2014 #6
... napkinz Jul 2014 #7
... napkinz Jul 2014 #8

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. If it is 'reform in name only'
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 08:22 PM
Jul 2014

then what exactly is his beef with it?

I've never understood the people who claim a law shouldn't exist because they think it will make no difference. If it makes no difference, then why should you care if it exists or not? Knock yourselves out, have tons of laws that 'don't do anything'. It won't hurt anyone or anything.

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
3. This bill was a "Bridge too far".
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 08:57 PM
Jul 2014

The bill, which I am sure all of you have read, , would include all semi auto 22 rimfires. This would make illegal most all 22 rimfire semi-auto rifles as their under barrel tube magazines carry 15 rounds of ammunition. There was no grandfathering of currently owned rifles, and no time allowed to convert and/or dispose of these rifles. Had he signed the bill then the owners would have become automatic felons, subject to arrest and prosecution. And since NJ has a required permit and registration of all semi auto firearms law enforcement would have no problem arresting the owners.

I realize that many of the posters on DU would laugh and support that scenario, it would not end well for those that passed, or signed off, or for their political party.

 

VScott

(774 posts)
6. Christie does something right for change.
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 09:33 PM
Jul 2014

And last I heard, Newtown isn't in NJ (let me check Google maps........... yep, it's not)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Christie Vetoes Gun...