Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsArizona Legislators Trying to Declare Pregnancy Two Weeks Prior to Conception
The past few months, weve seen the nation wake up to many anti-choice assaults on womens basic right to control their fertility, especially with regards to imposing forced ultrasounds and numerous attacks on access to basic contraception. But one of the other favorite anti-choice approaches to maximizing the pain and suffering of women as punishment for sex has largely gone unnoticed by many outside of the pro-choice activist community: bans on abortions after 20 weeks. Its understandable that its hard to whip people up about this particular situation. After all, abortions after 20 weeks are relatively rare. Only 1.5% of abortions occur after the 20th week, and the vast majority of those that do occur are done for medical reasons, or because legal and financial obstacles--like those put in place by lawmakers--caused a delay. While, if they knew their personal stories, most people would certainly sympathize with women in need of post-20 week abortions, a certain amount of reproductive rights fatigue is setting in. Theres only so many hours in the day, and anti-choicers know if they just keep throwing restrictions on access at us, some will slip through the cracks.
But, as exhausting as it is, we need to pay attention to and resist post-20 week bans on abortion. Thats because its cruel on its surface, but also because legislators are using 20 week bans in order to smuggle in other items of more importance to them than simply making it harder for a slim minority of women seeking abortions to get them. The most obvious thing theyre trying to do is set anti-science precedent. Since these bans are based on the false, unscientific claim that fetuses at 20 weeks can feel pain, if theyre allowed to stand, it opens the door for more laws based on straight-up lies to be passed. These laws are also being used to challenge the requirement set out in Roe v Wade that a womans health and life should trump that of the misogynist desire to keep her pregnant at all costs.
Legislators have had so much success smuggling in ulterior motives with 20-week bans that theyre now looking for ways to expand the amount of hard right anti-choice nonsense they can attach to those bills. The most recent---and extreme---example is Arizona. There, lawmakers are writing a 20-week abortion ban that starts counting off at the first day of a womans period. Yes, theyre arguing that youre pregnant while youre actually getting your period. In fact, as Kate Sheppard at Mother Jones explains, theyre really trying to steal as many weeks as possible away from women seeking abortion:
Most women ovulate about 14 or 15 days after their period starts, and women can usually get pregnant from sexual intercourse that occured anywhere between five days before ovulation and a day after it. Arizona's law would start the clock at a woman's last periodwhich means, in practice, that the law prohibits abortion later than 18 weeks after a woman actually becomes pregnant.
http://truth-out.org/news/item/8277-arizona-legislators-trying-to-declare-pregnancy-two-weeks-prior-to-conception
======================================================================
You cannot make this stuff up any weirder than what these legislators are actually putting down on paper and trying to pass....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1989 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arizona Legislators Trying to Declare Pregnancy Two Weeks Prior to Conception (Original Post)
MindMover
Apr 2012
OP
Perhaps they should declare sperm people before ejaculation, then. No wasting it --
Liberty Belle
Apr 2012
#1
Liberty Belle
(9,533 posts)1. Perhaps they should declare sperm people before ejaculation, then. No wasting it --
outlaw masturbation.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)2. I thought this was an April 1 joke.
Oy.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)3. I assumed it was the Onion (nt)
Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)4. Not defending this law, but the truth is
that it is standard procedure to date a pregnancy from the 1st day of the last menstrual period, and this is always how gestational age or length of pregnancy is measured.
That's why my twins gestational age at birth was 33 weeks 3 days, even though they had only been in my uterus for 31 weeks. 3 days for the time they spent developing in a petrie dish, plus an extra 2 weeks tacked on.
So this is not quite as strange as it sounds.