Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MerryBlooms

(11,767 posts)
Fri Jul 4, 2014, 06:57 PM Jul 2014

Quick Change Justice. While you were sleeping, Hobby Lobby just got so much worse.

The architecture of the U.S. Supreme Court Building is rife with turtles. There are turtles holding up the lampposts in the courtyard and turtles engraved in the stone decor. You can buy turtle coffee mugs at the gift shop. The turtle is said to represent the slow and deliberate pace of justice. This is an institution, the turtle tells us, that moves slowly, deliberately, and removed from the knee-jerk pace of the political branches.

Yet moments before they adjourned for their summer recess, the justices proved they can act quite quickly and recklessly when it comes to violating the terms of a controversial opinion they handed down only days earlier. It’s as if the loaner car the court gave us in the Hobby Lobby ruling broke down mere blocks from the shop.

In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, the Supreme Court ruled that it was a “substantial burden” on the religious freedoms of closely-held corporations for the government to require them to provide contraception as part of their employee health care plans. The court didn’t say that the government could never require a company to do something that violated its religious beliefs, but rather that the government had to use the “least restrictive alternative.” That means that if there is a slightly less burdensome way to implement the law, it needs to be used. To prove that the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate was not the “least restrictive alternative,” the court pointed to a workaround in the law for nonprofits: If there are religious objections to a medical treatment, third parties will provide coverage to the employees.

It’s the butterfly effect: Any time Wheaton flapped its religious-conscience wings, a woman ends up with an IUD.


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/07/wheaton_college_injunction_the_supreme_court_just_sneakily_reversed_itself.html

I can just picture these filthy fuckers raising their martini glasses high and toasting each other for another well-done fuck-over of America. I fucking hate these pieces of shit.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Quick Change Justice. While you were sleeping, Hobby Lobby just got so much worse. (Original Post) MerryBlooms Jul 2014 OP
If we had healthcare system corporations wouldn't need to buy health insurance rickyhall Jul 2014 #1

rickyhall

(4,889 posts)
1. If we had healthcare system corporations wouldn't need to buy health insurance
Fri Jul 4, 2014, 09:59 PM
Jul 2014

Seems corporates you appreciate that. But logic is never used in this country.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Quick Change Justice. Whi...