General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn 10 years there have been 7 wiretap requests turned down, out of over 20,000+ requests.
link to a PDF for stats from USCourts.gov
In 10 years there have been 7 wiretap requests turned down, out of over 20,000+ requests.
Average costs of intercepts for which costs reported: $41,119 in 2013. If Im reading the table correctly.
HERE: http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/Statistics/WiretapReports/2013/Table7.pdf
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)just how bad those requests must have been to be turned down.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)whether they did the wiretap, anyway. And how many cases there are where they didn't bother to ask.
randome
(34,845 posts)A representative -prosecutor, attorney, whatever- takes great care to not submit a request unless they are near certain it will be approved. If you get on the bad side of a judge or a FISA court, that 'taste' lingers with them and they start to look more skeptically at anything else you submit.
It's how the system routinely works in all areas of judicial involvement.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)That's not trying to avoid "getting on the wrong side of the judge".
Its called a rubber stamp court.