Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:40 PM Jul 2014

If Chris Dodd had won the Democratic nomination in 2008, would he have beaten John McCain?


2 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
Yes
1 (50%)
No
1 (50%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Chris Dodd had won the Democratic nomination in 2008, would he have beaten John McCain? (Original Post) onehandle Jul 2014 OP
That depends on whether McCain got desperate enough to pick Palin DJ13 Jul 2014 #1
Did Dodd even run? BainsBane Jul 2014 #2
Briefly. Gidney N Cloyd Jul 2014 #3
Wouldn't have even been close MohRokTah Jul 2014 #4
I don't see why not. Probably not the same margin so easier to cheat but I figure Dodd TheKentuckian Jul 2014 #5
Again? What's next, random names out of the phonebook? n/t winter is coming Jul 2014 #6
Absolutely. He's mainstream enough and disciplined enough to win. Drunken Irishman Jul 2014 #7
Chris "MPAA, SOPA, PIPA" Dodd has mainstream appeal? joshcryer Jul 2014 #9
My guess is that a solid majority of the mainstream have no clue what those are... Drunken Irishman Jul 2014 #10
yes, but turnout would have been low and results a bit closer JI7 Jul 2014 #8
Agreed. He might've done better in ethnic-white areas, but not enough to dominate. Drunken Irishman Jul 2014 #11
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
4. Wouldn't have even been close
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:21 PM
Jul 2014

In any race between two old white men who are difficult to distinguish between, the Republican has an advantage.

The landslide would have been the opposite of the Obama landslide.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
5. I don't see why not. Probably not the same margin so easier to cheat but I figure Dodd
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:57 PM
Jul 2014

or most any serious level (Senate, Governor, maybe even big city mayor) would have at least been even money and virtually all favored to varying degrees.

Hell, he is white, been around for a while, and a little long in the tooth.
Bush had fucked up so bad that many a Republican would have gone along with such a comfortable figure.

Who knows but it was our election to lose not some against all odds proposition some like to make out because they shit their britches when McShame had his little dead cat bounce with Phailin stirring a lil ruckus with the fuckwits.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
7. Absolutely. He's mainstream enough and disciplined enough to win.
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 12:58 AM
Jul 2014

Getting him the nod is much more difficult, though, than getting him to the White House. But he would've defeated McCain. The only two Democrats from 2008 that stood no chance at ever coming close to winning the White House were Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich. Even then, Gravel was light years ahead of Kucinich, who probably couldn't even win Vermont.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
10. My guess is that a solid majority of the mainstream have no clue what those are...
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 01:11 AM
Jul 2014

On the issues that define a campaign, absolutely he's pretty mainstream.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
11. Agreed. He might've done better in ethnic-white areas, but not enough to dominate.
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 01:15 AM
Jul 2014

Black turnout would be lower, which hurts in states like North Carolina, Virginia and probably Indiana. He wins Ohio, maybe Florida (with the Jewish and elderly vote), but doesn't dominate nearly like Obama.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Chris Dodd had won the...