Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 11:45 AM Jul 2014

Two Malaysian airliner crashes in less than 5 months. What are the chances?

Of that specific coincidence - exceedingly small. Of any similar coincidence? Overwhelming.

"According to people’s reports, their experience could not have occurred by accident or by coincidence. Therefore, lacking any clear scientific explanation, they conclude that the events were the result of some cosmic, spiritual, or supernatural forces beyond our current understanding.

On the face of it, this conclusion may seem reasonable, but it is not. Even if there were no current scientific explanation, this does not mean that the alleged causes really are true. Ignoring that for the moment, however, the argument also fails because of the key premise: that such an event cannot possibly be the result of coincidence. Not only is this premise not supported, it is in fact false.

People’s failure to realize this is due to their ignorance of statistics, in particular the statistics of large numbers. Studies have even shown that believers in the paranormal are worse than the average person when it comes to estimating the statistical chances of certain events occurring. The same people have also been shown in experiments to be more likely to perceive themselves as having some sort of “mental” control over events happening around them."

http://atheism.about.com/od/parapsychology/a/coincidence.htm

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two Malaysian airliner crashes in less than 5 months. What are the chances? (Original Post) wtmusic Jul 2014 OP
This one for sure wasn't a crash. hobbit709 Jul 2014 #1
Flying over a war zone pretty much negates any Jenoch Jul 2014 #2
"was shot down by a missile" != "crashed" Spider Jerusalem Jul 2014 #3
A co-factor could be that the Malaysians were saving fuel flamingdem Jul 2014 #4
It may be time to look further into their oversight... Barack_America Jul 2014 #7
Lotteries are won all the time despite phil89 Jul 2014 #5
Pretty high, apparently. Adsos Letter Jul 2014 #6
I feel very sorry for all the passengers & Malaysia air that this jet was targeted to be shot down uppityperson Jul 2014 #8

flamingdem

(39,312 posts)
4. A co-factor could be that the Malaysians were saving fuel
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 11:54 AM
Jul 2014

flying that route. It's harder to know about the first plane that went down but it may be financial as well in that there may have been short cuts in maintenance.

Just speculation but more grounded than looking to the paranormal.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
7. It may be time to look further into their oversight...
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jul 2014

...regarding who is flying their planes and where.

 

phil89

(1,043 posts)
5. Lotteries are won all the time despite
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 12:18 PM
Jul 2014

Seemingly impossible odds. No supernatural element necessary. People who think something very unusual happening=supernatural/mystical cause need to learn some critical thinking skills.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
8. I feel very sorry for all the passengers & Malaysia air that this jet was targeted to be shot down
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 12:42 PM
Jul 2014

not crashed, but shot down. Not disappeared, or a accident, but deliberate murder.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Two Malaysian airliner cr...