Nurse-midwife who won't prescribe birth control sues family planning center that didn't hire her

[ck4829]

Is “religious freedom” about being free to practice your faith, or just a generic cover story for any and all attempts to try to foist your beliefs on others? In this era of Hobby Lobby vs. Burwell, it’s understandable that many on the right have decided it’s the latter and are eager to start testing the limits of how much leverage the expansive new definition of “religious freedom” gives them to meddle with the private contraception choices of others. Next on the docket: Attempting to force family planning centers to hire nurse-midwives who refuse to let patients plan their families, all in the name of “religious freedom.”

Sara Hellwege is a nurse-midwife in Tampa, Florida, who opposes the use of some of the most effective and female-controlled forms of contraception, such as the birth control pill. Despite that position, Hellwege applied for a job with the Tampa Family Health Centers. When asked by the human resources director about her affiliation with an anti-contraception group called the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Hellwege admitted she would refuse to prescribe the birth control pill to anyone who wanted it. She was summarily told that prescribing the birth control pill was part of the job and was not hired.

Now, Hellwege is suing, with the backing of the Christian right organization Alliance Defending Freedom handling her case. Both ADF and Hellwege throw the word “abortion” around a lot, falsely conflating non-barrier methods of contraception with abortion. But the factual inaccuracy of Hellwege’s claims may not be an issue here, since the lawsuit argues that Hellwege is a victim of religious discrimination and deserves to be hired by a family planning clinic despite “her religious beliefs and association with the pro-life group AAPLOG.” Of course, the Supreme Court in Burwell v Hobby Lobby said that case covers all forms of contraception objected to in the name of religion, with no need for pseudoscience garble conflating ovulation suppression with abortion necessary, suggesting that the liberal use of the word “abortion” in this case is more about the continued right wing campaign to demonize contraception than anything else.

Win or lose, Hellwege’s case provides insight in how the war on contraception is shaping up. Direct assaults through legislation are going to be a much harder sell with contraception than abortion, so instead we’re getting the argument that someone else’s “religious freedom”—your boss, your nurse—entitles them to interfere with your ability to get contraception. Family planning centers are one place that women have long been able to trust will provide them contraception access without unnecessary hassle, and now the Christian right is trying to take even that away.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/07/21/sara_hellwege_sues_tampa_family_health_centers_pro_life_nurse_says_her_religious.html

It looks like that minefield that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg warned this country about is starting to go off.

[smokey nj]

1. Why would a nurse-midwife who opposes

contraception apply for a job at a family planning clinic? That makes about as much sense as a vegan chef applying for a job at a steakhouse.

[WinkyDink]

3. Why? Specifically to file the lawsuit she has filed: TO CHALLENGE THE LAW.

Key words above: "with the backing of the Christian right organization Alliance Defending Freedom handling her case."

[el_bryanto]

8. I'd also guess she'll have a book - ghostwritten. She'll probably land on her feet.

"So are you going to do the job?"
"I morally object to doing the job."
"Than we aren't going to hire you to do the job."
"Than I'll sue you for not hiring me so that I could not do the job."

Kind of messed up.

Bryant

[WinkyDink]

2. It is the flip-side of THIS:

http://www.topix.com/forum/columbus/TQNNNIJLM3CLKUEO7

[catrose]

9. and an awful lot of the commenters

think the Muslims shouldn't be accommodated.

A few years ago, Dell (or their minion Spherion) fired Muslims who were taking 5 minutes to pray--not disrupting the workflow, because they went in relays.

http://cair.com/press-center/press-releases/1236-muslims-reach-settlement-with-dell-spherion-on-workplace-prayer.html

That's a bit different than "I'm not going to do the job but you have to hire me anyway."

[get the red out]

4. Practice her bigotry

She seeks to beat her patients over the head with her unwarranted judgement and refusal to provide healthcare. If you can't prescribe medication or do procedures on patients because of your faith, then that faith should just make you ineligible for healthcare jobs PERIOD.

This is like a blind person suing to be a taxi driver.

[HockeyMom]

5. Why doesn't she go work at a Catholic health care center?

She can practice her "faith" there. Yes, it sounds like these people want to force their religion on others, and use the law to do just that.

[Bettie]

6. The sad thing is that it is very likely that the 5 Catholic Men

on the SC will give individuals the right to make the health care decisions of others based on their own personal religious views.

If you can't or won't do the job, don't expect to get or keep it.

[malaise]

7. I'll take to try to foist your beliefs on others

and make it a true daily double Alex