General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMinnesota man guns down teen girl after she asks him to stop riding lawnmower in her yard
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/07/24/minnesota-man-guns-down-teen-girl-after-she-asks-him-to-stop-riding-lawnmower-in-her-yard/
A Minnesota man who admitted shooting a 17-year-old girl multiple times because she asked him to stop trespassing on his riding lawnmower has been charged with attempted first-degree murder.
According to a criminal complaint obtained by The Associated Press, 40-year-old Chad Pickering shot the 17-year-old girl in the chest, right thigh and left ankle while she was standing on the deck of her Bemidji home on Monday night.
The victim herself was able to describe what had happened and talk to us and tell us that shed simply been shot when she stepped out of her house to check on her dogs, Sheriff Phil Hodapp explained to WCCO.
The teen told investigators that she had asked Pickering not to ride his lawnmower through her yard. She also said that he often carried a pistol with him on the lawnmower.
When the girl later went outside to tie up her barking dog, she saw someone crouching, and then felt three bullets strike her. She said that she could not walk, but was able to pull herself into the house to call 911.
Neighbors saw Pickering run through the teens yard, and he was quickly identified to police after the shooting.
Officers who searched his home found a .45-calibre semi-automatic pistol hidden in an air vent, which matched bullet casings found at the crime scene. Officers also noticed fresh grass stains on Pickerings jeans.
The suspect, however, insisted that he had not seen the gun in about a week. When officers confronted him with the evidence, Pickering reportedly admitted to the shooting.
The criminal complaint said that Pickering told officers he had taken his daughters for a ride on the mower, and then the girl came to his house to ask him to stop trespassing.
Pickering said that he went to her house, knelt by a pine tree and shot her twice after she came out the front door, the AP reported.
The victim was stabilized at Bemidji Sanford Hospital, and then was taken to Duluth for additional treatment. She was expected to recover from her wounds.
Pickering was charged with premeditated attempted first-degree murder. He was being held at Beltrami County Jail in lieu of $300,000 bond.
WCCO reported that Pickering had been employed at the Northwestern Minnesota Juvenile Center as a corrections worker until June 9 of this year.
Video at link.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)What Domestic Terrorists Are Teaching Our Children
lunasun
(21,646 posts)dhill926
(16,337 posts)for a long, long time.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)Response to 11 Bravo (Reply #113)
Post removed
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Technically, if were "acting like a pussy," he be tougher.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)How unoriginal...
sarisataka
(18,621 posts)When it comes to guns. Usually any and all terms are fair game.
The bigger surprise was the vote actually was hide, though it was close.
[div class="excerpt"JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Thu Jul 24, 2014, 05:45 PM, and voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I appreciate the poster's disgust about this incident, but they could have used another, more appropriate and non-sexist word than "pussy" to express that sentiment.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sigh.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: too much political correctness. Leave it be.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I must agree with the alerting member, this could have been worded much better.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: haven't folks learned that this kind of sexism is unacceptable?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
chervilant
(8,267 posts)my IL is chockablock full of sexists and misogynists.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)You said it all.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)Archae
(46,323 posts)"It's his 2nd amendment RIGHT to shoot anyone who won't let him drive his lawnmower where-ever he wants!"
samsingh
(17,595 posts)d_r
(6,907 posts)She is lucky she survived.
Dude has crazy eye.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I thought that myself. Good grief.
I was working on lyrics for my new country song.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I shot the lawn and the lawn won.
I shouldn't have gone there.
valerief
(53,235 posts)TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)What he did sounds like crazy mind had everything to do with it. That he has kids of his own it terrifying.
malthaussen
(17,193 posts)petronius
(26,602 posts)first be required to attend your seminar...
(It would be interesting to know why he no longer works at the juvenile center, whether it's a for-profit correctional facility, and what the process of his original hiring looked like.)
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)what a sick fuck. So glad the victim is going to survive.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The asshole should be imprisoned for life.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)It should be mortifying, and nothing else. But when you get to the part where the 17 year old girl survived this time, instead of dying senselessly, like so many others in these types of stories, you actually feel like there is a "good" ending and breath of a sigh of relief.
I know...it's crazy.
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)First of all this guy apparently sees nothing wrong with shooting someone because they asked him to stop driving his lawnmower across her property (property of her parents or whoever she lives with). Secondly he worked at a correctional facility?
That also concerns me. Correctional officers are (should be) subject to rules of engagement. If this guy is willing to shoot an unarmed teenager over a lawnmower dispute I shudder to think how he would react if an inmate crossed him.
We don't know the circumstances of his departure from the correctional facility but hopefully if he is convicted of the charges against him he would never be a candidate for employment with any police department, correctional facility, etc. ...i.e. any job that requires the ability to maintain your composure or a job that requires carrying a weapon.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)99.9% of gun owners would never even think of doing this shit.
If he's convicted of this crime, he'll be ineligible to ever own a gun again after he gets out of prison, much less any job in LE.
blueamy66
(6,795 posts)like most of the COs that I know....
IronGate
(2,186 posts)he'll go back to prison for violating federal law.
if he gets caught....
Response to mikeysnot (Reply #38)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Skittles
(153,150 posts)Response to Skittles (Reply #129)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Skittles
(153,150 posts)stop watching Fox News!
Response to Skittles (Reply #133)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MythosMaster
(445 posts)are the same as living breathing humans? And they deserve the same rights?
interesting...
Skittles
(153,150 posts)in the conservative world, "labor and minority" rights equate with.......gun humping rights.........oh ABSOLUTELY
Response to MythosMaster (Reply #140)
Name removed Message auto-removed
IronGate
(2,186 posts)like every other crime committed.
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)...you generally don't have a massive lobby trying to make sure the laws remain porous enough to ensure nobody ever gets caught unless they commit some other additional crime to call attention to themselves.
He may be in jail and maybe not, but someone else could be dead.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)Within the confines of the Constitution?
Make it double illegal?
lark
(23,097 posts)2 - Get new SCOTUS and throw out the previously partisan and wrong interpretation of the law. Yeah, I know, that would take some time, but talking long term best solution here.
3 - Short term - no sales without background checks, limit magazine size, eliminate open carry, gun locks required, limit to purchases of guns. It's a start and will stop some unnecessary deaths.
Response to lark (Reply #76)
Name removed Message auto-removed
sendero
(28,552 posts)... some people just cannot accept that for some problems there IS no solution.
But it makes them feel sanctimonious and proud to proclaim that there are.
Now me, I'm FOR background checks, no so much the other ideas here. But make no mistake, NONE of those will stop unhinged people from committing heinous crimes, not AT ALL.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)but does not transfer ownership of the weapon. The last owner of that serial number is also held responsible
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)on the need to own a gun.
I've been around for 73 years now and can honestly say that I have never needed a gun, what the hell is everyone afraid of?
I'm surrounded by hundreds of square miles of road-less wilderness area here in Oregon, lots of bears, mountain lions and other critters, I still don't need a gun, but then I not paranoid.
A gun won't protect your home from theft when you aren't there, probably get it stolen.
Yeah, I know it's your right to have one, my advice is to get a dog, better company too.
blueamy66
(6,795 posts)nt
IronGate
(2,186 posts)We have a winner.
As far as I can see, that's the only way we're going to reduce the proliferation of guns in this country.
The only time I've ever had to defend myself with a firearm is while I was an active duty Marine during 2 combat tours, otherwise, I use my wits, common sense and knowledge to stay out of harms way.
And, like you, I have a couple of BIG dogs as our first line of defense.
As a Oregonian, hello.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)yup
demwing
(16,916 posts)maybe we should stop treating gun nuts like evil bad guys, and start treating them like they are mentally ill?
Skittles
(153,150 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)If they're suffering from paranoia, then they have a mental disorder, and should be treated by a psychiatrist.
If they're cowards, then they're just lousy people, and should be treated accordingly.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)Ineeda
(3,626 posts)to defend your (and the NRA) position here. I'm making an assumption, I know, but based on what I've been reading from you, I doubt you are doing anything at all to make our world safer from gun violence. Any rational person would agree that incidents like these are totally unacceptable: this young girl whose life is changed forever, a dead dad in movie theater, a dead kid who listened to loud music in his own car, 26 slaughtered little kids and caregivers in an elementary school, and other hundreds or thousands of maimed or dead people suffering firearm accidents and deliberate acts. Families and friends and survivors horrifically damaged. So....what are you doing? Are you working toward better/more thorough background checks, or to limit magazine size, or gun lock requirements? Anything? Bueller? Bueller? Or are you too busy defending the indefensible with Right Wing/NRA talking points?
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)Given that all too many gun lovers place guns above the health and safety of others.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)but you are aware that it takes only 13 states to defeat a repeal don't you? Given that, what do you think the chances are of repealing the 2A?
And even if the 2A was repealed, the states can still set their own gun laws.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)Since the gun nut lobby is too strong.
The gun law that I like is the Swiss one: Only if you can prove that you need a handgun, then you can get a license.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)is to change the culture and attitudes of the American population.
Another way to slow down the gun violence is to end the war on drugs, which so far is a massive failure, this will take the illegal profits away from the dealers and I'll wager that in the inner cities, the violence would dramatically drop, and the added benefit would be, (hopefully) the money saved could be invested in the education system in those cities, along with rebuilding the infrastructure.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)right.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)Prove me wrong!!!
heaven05
(18,124 posts)weapons prove you wrong. And this is an everyday fact in america. Not buying the garbage you're selling. Go sell it to the 'open carry, bundy bunch' they'll buy and quickly.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)whistling in the wind because you know the facts are present everyday on news, in forums like this and others I might read. I don't have to prove anything to you. You're not that important to me. I know I'm right. Nothing you spout will change that. You have a fine day.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)savalez
(3,517 posts)IronGate
(2,186 posts)prove me wrong.
savalez
(3,517 posts)Do your own research.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)you haven't.
But you have a nice day anyways.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)And mere reality will not sway him from his desire to have guns, and let other gun nuts carry on.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)Bortman33
(102 posts)in any society would die of gunshot wounds IF no one in that society owned a gun.
I now, "they'd be killing each other with forks."
IronGate
(2,186 posts)Now, how do you remove firearms from our society within the confines of the Constitution?
Bortman33
(102 posts)by an iron gate, they combined the individual ownership of single shot muzzle loaded guns within the constraints of a WELL REGULATED MILITIA.
Instead of keeping your mind locked shut by the iron gate created by the NRA and other right wing propagandists, why don't you use your mind, the one that you seem to hold in such high regard, to make some suggestions that might help alleviate the disastrous consequences of our insane gun culture?
IronGate
(2,186 posts)But you still didn't answer my question.
Bortman33
(102 posts)helplessness, or you truly are helpless. Which is it?
Oh, my god, the constitution, a document written by some very astute yet very flawed men seems to have paralyzed your gated mind. You sound like a child who has not yet learned that the word no/know has multiple meanings.
Try
three round clipsas an example of improving the system, it does seem good enough for ducks, why not people?
That wasn't that hard, now was it? Now you give it a try.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)just do a search and you'll see what I would support.
Still with the silly snark.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)will want to be denying all that?
Good for you, run along and play with your guns.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)2. The fact remains that 99.9% of gun owners would never do what this fucking moron did.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)gun owners would disagree with you....making up stuff is fun and easy, 99.9% of the time.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I own several guns. But I'm not a Ted Nugent type of enthusiast. Gun nuts are entirely out of control.
demigoddess
(6,640 posts)he obeyed the one about shooting people!!!!!!!?
GeorgeGist
(25,320 posts)niyad
(113,275 posts)IronGate
(2,186 posts)but it's a fact that 99.9% of gun owners are nothing like this idiot.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)Personally, I'd think some restrictions on gun ownership -- that reasonably that last crazy guy really shouldn't have one -- would be something rational that the other 999 would agree to.
But, somehow some really well paid lobbyists work real hard to make sure the crazy guy can have every gun he wants.
Surely the crazy guy is not the only one paying these rich lobbyists -- they don't come cheap you know...
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Right?
I mean, you're really vulnerable out there in the open like that going back and forth in a straight line. There might be a sniper out there getting a bead on you.
Right?
Oh,....and FORGET this shit:
You're a sitting duck.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)...in GD. But please be advised that broad-brush smears anywhere are based on prejudice and animosity toward a whole class of people.
That is not very liberal, though increasingly acceptable in DU.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)I'd love to see hand guns be illegal in this country. Yeh, I'm one of those.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Again, the broad-based smear I referenced is founded and nurtured by prejudice and animosity. If you want to sell that as "liberal," go ahead. But it Is Not. And it will be pointed out early and often.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Fucking sick, sick culture.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)A physical object as a focus of hatred matters little to me. But when it comes to a culture, this can involve tens of millions of Americans. That's what concerns me about an increasingly loud strain of "liberal" rhetoric: It relies on the very corrosive emotions and intolerance "we" condemn in the far right. This in turn is why the "gun-control" side of things is seen as less mainstream (if it ever was), and more of an extreme fringe.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)He should not be allowed to own a lawnmower ever again, or at least restrict him to non-powered, push mowers. The gun was just an innocent bystander.
lark
(23,097 posts)A nut with a gun almost did. Take away the gun, he's not nearly so much of a threat.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)he could have crushes the lawnmower betwee his hands to the point where its constituent atoms fused. Had he done that, it could have been more lethal than the gun.
Inkfreak
(1,695 posts)ecstatic
(32,688 posts)The desire to open carry indicates a temporary or ongoing mental illness (IMO).
freebrew
(1,917 posts)This stupidity is being encouraged by the media/government every day through lies from the idiot box.
Making guns illegal doesn't seem to help(Chicago). By making them illegal, you will create a police state.
Get rid of the idiots. Problem solved.
If the answer were that easy, it would have been done, maybe, already.
Making laws against an item is prohibition. No real liberal should sponsor prohibition of any sort.
IMHO
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)sakabatou
(42,152 posts)liberalhistorian
(20,817 posts)a gun while mowing his fucking lawn? To shoot any errant blades of grass that defied the mower blades??? Jesus F. Christ, I'm so SICK of this fucking bullshit. Now we can't even ask people to stop trespassing on our own property without fear of being shot for it? We already can't even go to the damned movies, or anywhere else anymore, without that fear thanks to the NRA and the RKBA nutballs.
Roy Serohz
(236 posts)I hope you get the max, you fucking piece of shit!
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Err, if only SHE'D been armed THAT would have stopped him!
I am soooo glad she will survive.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)I'm getting sick of this shit. It's the one real fear I have moving from VA, a place full of gun nuts, to FL a place full of nuts with guns.
I'll keep my head up though and try to stick to the ghettos. I should be fairly safe there.
KG
(28,751 posts)no need to assume a goofball with a gun is going to shoot you!
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)I wonder when he's going to realize that now his kids will grow up without their father.
Laffy Kat
(16,377 posts)Why do I get the feeling that his kids may be relieved to have their father locked up for the remainder of their childhood?
Nay
(12,051 posts)they consciously don't even know why.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)geardaddy
(24,926 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)IronGate
(2,186 posts)That NRA has come out in favor of convicted felons not being able to possess firearms.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)in order to actually make it so convicted felons can't possess firearms.
Oh wait, that makes no sense.
riqster
(13,986 posts)You know, expanded background checks, closing the gun show loophole, etc.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)A fed. UBC would probably be overturned by the courts as it violates the Commerce Clause, states are within their rights to impose UBC's, as several states have already done.
It's already federally illegal for a resident of one state to cross border and buy a gun in another state without an FFL background check, but it's not illegal for in state transfers without a B/C, which needs to be addressed by the states.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)get rid of the fucking handguns.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)How do you propose to do that within the confines of the Constitution?
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)And who the hell needs hand guns for a well-regulated militia.
Total bullshit
Fuck all the gun cheerleading on this site.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)any Amendment, and at present, there is no apetite for a Constitutional Convention to amend the Constitution to abolish handguns, especially when the American people oppose a handgun ban by appox. 75%.
The new poll also finds public opposition to banning handgun ownership holding at a record-high 74%, identical to a year ago. One in four Americans think the law should limit possession to police and other authorized persons.
Recent attitudes on this are markedly different from the 1980s, when barely half of Americans opposed a ban on civilian handgun ownership. It is also a major turnaround from a half century ago, when only 36% opposed such a ban. Opposition to banning citizens' possession of handguns mounted in the 1990s and 2000s, and first crossed the 70% threshold in 2009.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/165563/remains-divided-passing-stricter-gun-laws.aspx
So, given that, banning handguns isn't possible for the foreseeable future.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Maybe sometime if enough people are murdered people will come to their senses.
Yeh, I know that won't happen.
Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.
H. L. Mencken
US editor (1880 - 1956)
Can't argue with that.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)What does "well regulated" mean? In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the U.S. Supreme Court stated that
the adjective 'well-regulated' implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training.
What is the mechanism by which "proper discipline and training" is provided to members of this militia? How well disciplined was Adam Lanza? James Holmes? Jared Loughner? Cho Seung Hui?
Until this so-called militia is being adequately regulated, the purported right of the people to keep and bear arms MUST be infringed. If it is not regulated (or infringed upon), such a militia actually undermines and threatens the security of the state."
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)Also, what have you done to implement your plan, other than posting in an internet message board?
riqster
(13,986 posts)Ermmmmmm... No.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)but not on the state level.
I personally favor every firearm sale/transfer having to go through an FFL B/C.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The NRA opposes background checks. At both the state and federal level.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)riqster
(13,986 posts)Your statement has been thoroughly debunked and disproven. Repudiation would be a much more credible response than waffling.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)The NRA has supported the banning of felons from possessing weapons.
riqster
(13,986 posts)"18. the nra and the gunfreaks will fight for his right to keep on carrying"
Which does not say what you now claim it does. Furthermore, you responded with a generalized claim of your own, so your claim fails on multiple counts.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)The NRA will not fight for the right of a convicted felon to keep on carrying, but if that's what you want to believe, have at it.
You have a nice day.
riqster
(13,986 posts)You said before that that the NRA was AGAINST such a right, and when it was pointed out that their actions do not match the motivation you ascribe to them, you started using rhetorical tricks instead of directly refuting my counterclaim.
If the NRA were indeed against felons having certain weaponry, they would support better background checks. The NRA has opposed any and all attempts to create such. That is the reality you are attempting to ignore.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)if that's what you want to believe, have at it.
Again, have a good day.
riqster
(13,986 posts)Cops across the country say they don't want certain felons to have certain types of guns, and they show their support of that position by advocating for better criminal background checks. This is a self-consistent combination of rhetoric and action.
The NRA, according to you, agrees with the cops, but works against those same checks. That is a case of rhetoric and action NOT matching.
Belief is irrelevant. Facts rule.
mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)reality catch it.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)lark
(23,097 posts)NOT!!! Fuck, they don't even care if small children are shot in mass - see their response to all schoolyard shootings.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)So, bullshit.
If the NRA was actually against felons purchasing firearms, they would be all for a universal background checks for every purchaser, including all private sales or transfers.
The NRA's own research shows that one out of five weapons used by criminals was legally obtained.
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)Holy shit. Sick fuck was in an authority position over teens.
Trillo
(9,154 posts)Just what kind of rehab is possible when this guy's one of the role models?
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)They found the gun "hidden in an air vent."
I wonder how they knew to look there.
IronGate
(2,186 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)IronGate
(2,186 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Or something.
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)FlyByNight
(1,756 posts)Do I even want to know why the fuck this psychopath would carry while on the goddamn lawnmower?
I can only imagine the standard, boilerplate litany of right-wing, NRA-approved talking points spilling out of his mouth.
I hope the girl recovers quickly - both physically and mentally.
Tetris_Iguana
(501 posts)What a 'victory' for gun nut rights.
progressoid
(49,988 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)Nay
(12,051 posts)fine to shoot some damn female who asked him to get off HER lawn is indicative of more than a gun problem -- methinks he has a misogyny problem as well. His daughters will be better off without his august presence.
I blame the patriarchy for this one.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)He's no father figure to them if he goes around shooting other girls. He is a suck fuck.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)What kind of a lunatic does this stuff? Lock him up and throw away the keys.
Better yet, give *HER* family a little time in a room with him first. No guns. Maybe baseball bats.
Grrr...
Blecht
(3,803 posts)WTF is is that Confederate flag all about?
It looks like the victim's family has issues, too.
I think I'll be staying the hell away from Bemidji.
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)Disturbing.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)There are assholes in all parts of the country.
Not to mention that the shooting did not take place in Bemidji.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)The guy lives four houses away and he shot her for telling him not to trespass on the property again. Is that one of the relevant family issues?
Blecht
(3,803 posts)Do I want to go to Bemidji?
Things to consider:
1. Former correctional facility employee riding a mower with a gun who shoots girl.
2. Family proudly flying that disgusting flag.
Two strikes.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)Bemidji is a nice small town, espe ially this time of year. It can get real cold in the winter however.
You seem to be blaming Bemidji for what happened rather than the perp. This incident did not even happen in Bemidji by the way.
sarisataka
(18,621 posts)Judge a town or area based on the actions of one person/family?
The other 99.992% of the people did not try to murder any one. Likely the number of those 12,000+ people in town who display confederate flags is also quite low.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)I have no words...
Enrique
(27,461 posts)MythosMaster
(445 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 27, 2014, 03:57 PM - Edit history (1)
and someone on here told me only 'urban' areas have a gun problem. I'm glad the young woman will live. I'm getting to the point where I think guns are a real problem. This jerk was/is a corrections worker among juveniles. He'll probably get a slap on the wrist and be free again in a few months.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Mine have gone after my animals, and fortunately failed. Luckily my horses are smarter than the asshole across the street.
Instead, I posted big ugly signs every 50'. And I filed a trespassing complaint with the police, to which they added harassment when I added the attempt to drive my horses out of their pasture into a busy road (and frame me for it by leaving the pasture gate wide open so I'd be charged with negligance).
ecstatic
(32,688 posts)Nobody will ever speak up from fear of being gunned down by a concealed or open carry gun owner.
Inkfreak
(1,695 posts)This guys a 1st class shit stain. Hope he rots in jail.
LW1977
(1,234 posts)lark
(23,097 posts)For every one person protected, hundreds (thousands?) are killied and wounded every day for totally stupid reasons like this.
Thank God he's a bad shot or she'd be dead. Hope he has a long fun time in jail, it won't be nearly long enough.
onethatcares
(16,166 posts)who will be responsible for the medical bills?
I have a feeling it won't be that asshole Pickering.
Gaud, her life and her parents are going to change drastically.
negoldie
(198 posts)geardaddy
(24,926 posts)catchnrelease
(1,945 posts)Maybe Lorne Malvo needs to pay this guy a visit.
(The hit man from the Fargo series.)
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)If only the girl had also been armed, this never would have happened.
There's already enough laws on the books!
Botany
(70,501 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)calimary
(81,220 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)What a miserable excuse for a person.
I'm glad that the victim lived. I hope she's there to face him (unlike he did since he's a fucking coward) when they sentence him. I hope she sues the ever-fucking shit out of him as icing on the cake. I hope she destroys what's left of a poor excuse of life he has.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Teach those complainin' people a lesson!
Just what the drafters of the Second Amendment intended.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)I have heard the 2A is needed to protect the other rights. Well, there you have it!
lunasun
(21,646 posts)(looks like removed now so can not confirm) sounds about right for profile of someone who would do this .
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I bet. Or just plain nuts?
paleotn
(17,911 posts)demigoddess
(6,640 posts)he was standing his ground? defending his right to trespass?? or just plain misogynist idiot???
randys1
(16,286 posts)wants to train 6 yr olds to use guns, all the neighbor adolescents should have had semi automatic machine guns so they could shoot too
paleotn
(17,911 posts)a "responsible gun owner" ®, until he wasn't.
TBF
(32,053 posts)just ship them directly to NRA headquarters. Let them deal with the mess they've created.
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)But that's obvious.
Bartlet
(172 posts)"Law abiding gun owner", until of course he's not and is charged with attempted 1st degree murder.
Surprised she survived a 45 cal chest shot, she is one lucky girl.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)czarjak
(11,269 posts)"Besides, I've got a gun.˝
nikto
(3,284 posts)I'd bet money on it.
But hey, he's...
Just exercising his freedom.
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)but I'll bet you're right about who he votes for.
nikto
(3,284 posts)C Moon
(12,212 posts)The folks that pop in (almost like they are here for just that reason) when these horrid acts occur, and defend metal and gunpowder is strange.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)supercats
(429 posts)Responsible, stable, well adjusted people with their guns...OK if this isn't a billboard story for real responsible gun ownership I don't know what is... This guy should be no where near allowed to own a gun, just look at his decision process: trespassing on his lawn mower, asked to leave her property, feels omnipotent and decides to kill the girl, though he was clearly at fault. We need to ban all guns from our society! That's the only solution, otherwise it's going to continue being the wild wild west, which is what the republicans want.
raccoon
(31,110 posts)Also, hope he goes to prison for a longgggggggggggggg time.
TBF
(32,053 posts)who have lost people in the past couple of years to mass and individual shootings. It would be interesting to see a class action suit filed against the NRA - to see if they would be held responsible as the inciting terrorist organization that they are (any proceeds could be earmarked for a non-violent ad campaign).
vlyons
(10,252 posts)He didn't just lose his temper in the moment and go off in a fit of rage. He laid in wait for her. That's why he's charged with 1st degree, not 2nd degree attempted murder. Laying in wait is heinous and he deserves a long, long stay in the pokey.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Chemisse
(30,809 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)bulloney
(4,113 posts)You never know when you need to "stand your ground" against some rogue crabgrass.
PatrickforO
(14,570 posts)Gosh I know I feel better now!
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)buy of course crazee in the negative sense now...
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)A few weeks ago seven people were shot in a popular nightlife area in my city. Why? Because someone accidentally bumped into someone else when standing in line outside a club.
The next weekend the police chief actually got on the teevee to say that accidentally bumping someone while standing in line is not a reason to start shooting.
Christ in a sidecar. Have we come to this as a society?
philip.chinery
(18 posts)Seriously, why are all of these people like this?