General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat is the one and only thing we can do to make sure no innocent person gets the death penalty?
and is that life worth doing that one thing?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)easychoice
(1,043 posts)the way the cops lie we should never let the state off anyone.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,580 posts)MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)fuckups alone is worth it a thousand fold.
libisnota4letterword
(6 posts)I have yet to understand how killing people to teach people that killing people is wrong works.
Suich
(10,642 posts)Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)First option: Try and create telepaths or technology that would have teh same effect (and that's at least forty years away).
Second option: Have you read Hominids? That suggests a world where everyone is implanted with a personal computer (similar to a small tablet pc) that also records everything around them. Records are held centrally but may only be accessed by teh user or law enforcement investigating a crime.
Third option: Abolish the death penalty. I'm conflicted on this one. I believe in the death penalty but only in cases where we have absolute proof of guilt. I'm thinking the mountains of concurring evidence from eye-witness, psychologists and all the forensic scientists that convicted Harold Shipman (for example). If there is anything less than absolute proof, the death penalty cannot and must not be used.
I also think that, within the next twenty years, advances in technology will make this an obsolete argument. By then, we'll have developed long-term suspended animation. So we just freeze the perp and warehouse the block of ice (or cryo-tank or whatever). If it turns out that we were wrong, we can just thaw them out and let them go with apologies and whatever payment is deemed appropriate.