Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:17 PM Jul 2014

Has Michelle Obama joined forces with Monsanto?

Live Leak is reporting that Monsanto has upon negotiating with Michelle Obama agreed to dedicate $50 million towards genetically modifying crops to be healthier.

The popular agriculture company Monsanto is partnering with First Lady Michelle Obama to promote nutritional foods for kids. According to reports from the Associated Press, Monsanto will spend $50 million over five years on a campaign to market ‘healthy’ genetically modified food to children. The agrochemical company will also bring its food offerings for kids in line with the new federal standards for labeling and nutrition.

Obama announced her intentions in front of crates of fresh produce on Thursday. “When I see a company like Monsanto launch an initiative like this, I feel more hopeful than ever before,” said the First Lady. “We can improve how we make and sell food in this country.”


To remind you, this is when President Obama signed the "Monsanto protection act" a little while back.

http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/archive/segment/obama-slammed-for-signing-farmer-assurance-provision/515a1b6efe344451ee000507

Well, I feel something, hopeful is not the label I would put on it. But I do feel something.
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has Michelle Obama joined forces with Monsanto? (Original Post) Savannahmann Jul 2014 OP
... conservaphobe Jul 2014 #1
This story does not trouble me at all. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #2
for posterity, the OP geek tragedy Jul 2014 #7
The fainting couch I had delivered to my office just came in to use. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author geek tragedy Jul 2014 #4
The first link had me laughing. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #8
I self-deleted. Want to see honest reactions geek tragedy Jul 2014 #10
A new poll shows 13% of Democrats support impeaching the President. conservaphobe Jul 2014 #9
Or just false-flag Tea Partiers. Jackpine Radical Jul 2014 #26
They don't need to do anything. DU's woo hunters and volunteer scientists have proclaimed GMOs safe whatchamacallit Jul 2014 #5
So, you think the "woo hunters" would be geek tragedy Jul 2014 #6
One of those stories that separates Codeine Jul 2014 #11
No more genes in our food FrodosPet Jul 2014 #16
To date, bioengineering has concentrated on production, not nutrition. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #12
Truly. Codeine Jul 2014 #13
As explained in my edit, Genetic Modification techniques can overcome the problem in hybridization. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #14
I do not think this story indicates that such efforts are underway. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #15
Southern MN is full of Monsanto businesses and I would suspect many of them are in her district. jwirr Jul 2014 #17
The post is about Michelle Obama geek tragedy Jul 2014 #18
Oops. Just scanned to article and for me it seemed reasonable that any Michelle associated with jwirr Jul 2014 #19
I'm sure it was an honest mistake. conservaphobe Jul 2014 #20
That person was not disrespectful of FLOTUS at all. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #21
I am definitely not disrespectful of Michelle Obama. She is one of the best first ladies we have had jwirr Jul 2014 #22
Wrong Michelle. GeorgeGist Jul 2014 #28
I know - did not read closely enough. See my post above with the apology. jwirr Jul 2014 #29
???? The link is to The Daily Leak.org - which appears to be a parody site. hedgehog Jul 2014 #23
No. That is dailyleak.org, not 'Live Leak' (why did you say that?), a fake news site muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #24
You've been duped Cali_Democrat Jul 2014 #25
The OP says he's feeling something. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #27
 

conservaphobe

(1,284 posts)
1. ...
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:24 PM
Jul 2014
As an example of Republican obstruction, Mrs. Obama said: “In fact, it’s gotten so bad, they’re even trying to block the work that I do on childhood obesity and that’s really saying something. I mean, for most folks in this country, making sure our kids get decent nutrition shouldn’t be that controversial.”


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-first-lady-michelle-obama-in-chicago-to-raise-money-for-dems-20140723,0,4895587.story
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
2. This story does not trouble me at all.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:25 PM
Jul 2014

It does not make me question Michelle Obama's integrity or commitment to healthy food. Not one iota.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. for posterity, the OP
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:34 PM
Jul 2014

Savannahmann
Has Michelle Obama joined forces with Monsanto?

Live Leak is reporting that Monsanto has upon negotiating with Michelle Obama agreed to dedicate $50 million towards genetically modifying crops to be healthier.

The popular agriculture company Monsanto is partnering with First Lady Michelle Obama to promote nutritional foods for kids. According to reports from the Associated Press, Monsanto will spend $50 million over five years on a campaign to market ‘healthy’ genetically modified food to children. The agrochemical company will also bring its food offerings for kids in line with the new federal standards for labeling and nutrition.

Obama announced her intentions in front of crates of fresh produce on Thursday. “When I see a company like Monsanto launch an initiative like this, I feel more hopeful than ever before,” said the First Lady. “We can improve how we make and sell food in this country.”


To remind you, this is when President Obama signed the "Monsanto protection act" a little while back.

http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/archive/segment/obama-slammed-for-signing-farmer-assurance-provision/515a1b6efe344451ee000507

Well, I feel something, hopeful is not the label I would put on it. But I do feel something.
0

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
3. The fainting couch I had delivered to my office just came in to use.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:27 PM
Jul 2014

"Live Leak is reporting that Monsanto has upon negotiating with Michelle Obama agreed to dedicate $50 million towards genetically modifying crops to be healthier."

The Horror.

Response to NCTraveler (Reply #3)

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
8. The first link had me laughing.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:36 PM
Jul 2014

I didn't make it past the first paragraph in the second link.

"President Obama has armed terrorists across the Middle East, provided aid to Islamic nations, and sided with Muslims at nearly every turn. In 2013, the President gave $195 million in aid to Syrians over the month long holiday of Ramadan. This year he’s giving $500 million!"

Amazing that this is brought here.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
11. One of those stories that separates
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:37 PM
Jul 2014

the people who passed high school science classes from those who did not.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
16. No more genes in our food
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:50 PM
Jul 2014

Genetics and chromosomes are bad and scary. We should ONLY be eating the same food that neanderthals ate. They were happy and healthy and lived to their 100s on a regular basis (unless they were killed and eaten by dinosaurs).

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
12. To date, bioengineering has concentrated on production, not nutrition.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:41 PM
Jul 2014

Might be good to alter the focus.

The biggest promise of genetic modification that has been missing the entire time has been the capability of working within a specific genus to pull desirable alleles that exist on specific loci that contain undesirable traits into other loci with desirable traits in order to actually have the desirable trait in offspring without the undesirable traits.

This has been the problem of selective breeding for centuries because the standard techniques will never remove undesirable traits on any given locus to achieve the desired trait in an allele on that locus.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
13. Truly.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jul 2014

GMOs are an important tool for feeding a growing global population, and for feeding them in an increasingly nutritious way.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
14. As explained in my edit, Genetic Modification techniques can overcome the problem in hybridization.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:48 PM
Jul 2014

If a desirable trait only exists on a locus with numerous undesirable traits, it can be impossible to achieve the desired trait without the undesirable traits if it is a recessive trait. Genetic Modification can change that by moving the allele to a locus without those undesirable traits.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
15. I do not think this story indicates that such efforts are underway.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 12:48 PM
Jul 2014

For reasons that will be made obvious.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
17. Southern MN is full of Monsanto businesses and I would suspect many of them are in her district.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 01:17 PM
Jul 2014

She has no doubt received a lot of support from them in her political career.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
19. Oops. Just scanned to article and for me it seemed reasonable that any Michelle associated with
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 01:20 PM
Jul 2014

Monsanto would be Bachmann.



Sorry Michelle Obama.

 

conservaphobe

(1,284 posts)
20. I'm sure it was an honest mistake.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 01:36 PM
Jul 2014


Don't denigrate a good woman like Michelle Obama just because you are ignorant of the sound science behind genetically modified foods.

P.S. Snowflakes aren't proof climate change is a myth.

P.S.S. Vaccinations save lives.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
21. That person was not disrespectful of FLOTUS at all.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 01:38 PM
Jul 2014

I don't think there's a need to get harsh.

Michelle Obama is a big believer in organic foods.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
22. I am definitely not disrespectful of Michelle Obama. She is one of the best first ladies we have had
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 02:41 PM
Jul 2014

in a long time. Thank all of you for your support.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
24. No. That is dailyleak.org, not 'Live Leak' (why did you say that?), a fake news site
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 03:37 PM
Jul 2014
The Daily Leak is a satirical website. The contents of the DailyLeak.org may not be reprinted or re-transmitted in whole or in part without the express written consent of the publisher. The Daily Leak is not intended for readers under 18 years of age.

The Daily Leak uses invented names in all its stories, except in cases where public figures are being satirized. Any other use of real names is accidental and coincidental.

http://dailyleak.org/faq/


Do not listen to Drudge. If you didn't get this from Drudge, then work out where you did get it from, and add them to your list of "sites that are too lazy, gullible or dishonest to check out a story they like".
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has Michelle Obama joined...