Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow to Check if That "Viral Video" is True or False--Columbia Journalism Review
Journalists dont always verify user-generated content, so readers need to learn how to verify what they see online- See more at: http://www.cjr.org/news_literacy/verifying_ugc.php?page=all#sthash.gg5A7ZKp.dpuf
When big news breaks, like the Malaysian airline plane crash in eastern Ukraine on Thursday afternoon, news organizations cant say much thats not confirmed. So they, along with hungry news consumers, turn to user-generated content for answers, such as these first two crash-related posts on verified UGC feed FB Newswire: a photo of extra security at Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam and a post from a Dutch passenger as he was boarding the flight, both found and verified on Facebook. But verified items on social media are rare occurrences. See, for example, this Vox.com discussion of an item posted on a social media account possibly belonging to eastern Ukrainian rebel commander Igor Strelkov. Incredibly of-the-moment, but possibly untrue.
----------------snip
There may be little incentive to verify online contentif the error is big enough, one school of thought goes, it will self-correct. But as UGC becomes a common content source, there is an increasing push for journalists to investigate it before using it, and a host of projects have emerged recently to help them do so. These include Amnesty Internationals recently launched "Citizen Evidence Lab," which provides journalists and human-rights advocates with tools for verifying user-generated video, the BBCs "Verification Hub, the Verification Handbook " freely available online), recent Knight News Challenge winner "Checkdesk," and new online efforts by citizen journalists to factcheck news.
These resources, however, are targeted toward journalists rather than the reading public, who is constantly inundated by viral content with few resources at hand to check the veracity of whats before them. In this space, UGC verification becomes a news literacy issue. But convincing readers to check before they share likely requires making the former as easy as the latter.
In Stony Brook Universitys news literacy course for undergraduates, Lesson 12, called Analyzing Social Media, teaches students the V.I.A. method, a three-step check in which students attempt to Verify a news item by looking for creation dates and multiple, reputable sources, and evaluate the organization providing the information as Independent and Authentic by looking up background and social media connections.
The method reads like a scaled-down version of the processes acclaimed social media news agency Storyful uses in its own verification work, which it provides as a service for newsrooms. When staffers there come across a piece of UGC, they begin with skepticism and start building a story from there.
We always start thinking from a point of: This actually could be from last year, explained Managing Editor Aine Kerr, speaking of recent footage of a strike in Gaza. It could be Syria. It might not even be Gaza. It might not be today. There could be photoshopping going on.
To that end, Storyful runs the hashtag #DailyDebunk, which showcases the type of verification they do on a regular basis for newsrooms. People are used to reading stories that obviously have been verified and are authentic and legitimate, which is great, says Kerr, but particularly in the world of trends and viral, the amount of hoaxes and fakery is vast.
During the World Cup, for example, an image of a woman in a dumpster in Brazil went viral, but after "Storyful "editors ran it through their verification process, they discovered it was a year old. Images that were purported to be riots from São Paulo were similarly debunked upon reverse image search. Within minutes were able to go to our clients, but crucially to the public, and say These are old images, do not share them, explained Kerr.
MORE OF ARTICLE AT:
http://www.cjr.org/news_literacy/verifying_ugc.php?page=all#sthash.gg5A7ZKp.dpuf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 576 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How to Check if That "Viral Video" is True or False--Columbia Journalism Review (Original Post)
KoKo
Jul 2014
OP
Iggo
(47,489 posts)1. Next you'll be telling me that wasn't really Bruce Lee in that Nokia commercial.
Oops, I mean that "found" ping-pong video.