Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBob McDonnell's sham marriage compared to his family values masters thesis
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/08/bob_mcdonnell_public_corruption_trial_how_his_marriage_defense_squares_with.html?google_editors_picks=trueFocus on the Family
What Bob McDonnells Regent University thesis says about his public corruption defense.
It's impossible not to see this tragedy through the rosy lens of McDonnells much-scrutinized graduate thesis, authored in 1989 for a masters in public policy and a J.D. from Regent University. When the Washington Post first reported on the thesis in 2009, it kicked up something of an Internet ruckus about whether it reflected McDonnells actual contemporary political views on gender equality (opposed), homosexuality (opposed), birth control (ditto), and welfare (also ditto). McDonnell was 34, married, and a father when he wrote that thesis, but he passed it off as youthful musings, explaining during his run for governor, that voters should not judge him based on a decades-old academic paper I wrote as a student during the Reagan era and havent thought about in years. He publicly claimed that his views had changed over the years. But as the Post noted at the time, during his 14 years in the General Assembly, McDonnell pursued at least 10 of the policy goals he laid out in that research paper, including abortion restrictions, covenant marriage, school vouchers and tax policies to favor his view of the traditional family.
McDonnells views on marriage, family, austerity, personal responsibility, and morality as laid out in the 93-page paper, are worthy of revisiting in light of the drama now playing out in Richmond. Its not so much a question of whether he governed by these values anymore, as whether he and his family lived by them. The thesis was an argument for infusing Christian Republican values into government policy. His view was that family is an institution that predates civil government and thus may not be defined by it. This is because the Creator instituted marriage and family in Eden. The family and marriage are celebrated as the best safeguard against immorality and selfishness. The thesis is a lengthy exposition on the ways modern government has disrupted and undermined traditional families and a road map back to a Christian view of the primacy of family as an organizing unit. There is a lengthy section on the evils of government-assisted child care that enables women to work. There is a bracing reminder about the need for fiscal austerity(!). There are some nice zingers about liberals (who measure equality on a factual economic basis). And there is a lot of talk about the evils of welfare and government aid and the need for self-reliance(!!). There are strong words for families who reject the traditional values of responsibility and accountability. And the tour de force comes at the end with a laundry list of the real enemies of the traditional familymaterialism, irresponsibility, feminism, lust, and ultimately selfishness, which McDonnell concedes are largely outside the sphere of government control. Those qualities now stand as the organizing principles of the current McDonnell defense strategy, althoughto be clearthe materialism, irresponsibility, lust, and selfishness are all massed on Maureens side of the ledger. And the dreaded feminism is nowhere in evidence.
You need read no further than Page 39 of the document, where McDonnell whimsically muses: Must government subsidize the choices of a generation with an increased appetite for the materialistic components of the American Dream? to understand the real failure of the thesis as a political and moral argument: Materialism and greed know no ideological, class, or religious bounds. It isnt just the greedy welfare beneficiaries who are seduced by the need for pretty, pretty things. Yet the lectures about morality and austerity unerringly seem to come from the guy with the free Rolex. People who live in glass governors mansions really shouldnt throw stones.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 979 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bob McDonnell's sham marriage compared to his family values masters thesis (Original Post)
Liberal_in_LA
Aug 2014
OP
underpants
(182,773 posts)1. Great article
I've been sort of following this here locally (Richmond Va) I figured he would get out of it somehow. The local RW radio station is trying to diminish the daily events claiming it is a political soap opera.
His Masters thesis (at Pat Ribertson's joke of a college) comes back into light. Hilarious.
FSogol
(45,480 posts)2. McDonnell and wife are common grifters. One thing that came out in the trial
was McDonnell's wife approached Ann Romney with the "my friend's fake nutritional supplements can cure MS" and single handedly took her husband out of VP contention.