Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,776 posts)
Sat Aug 9, 2014, 01:26 PM Aug 2014

Iowa GOP Senate Candidate: U.S. Troops Should Have Stayed In Iraq 'Longer'

The Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Iowa, state Sen. Joni Ernst, suggested that if additional U.S. troops had remained in Iraq for a longer period of time, the current situation of the U.S. conducting airstrikes against Islamic militants in the country wouldn't be happening.

Ernst made those comments in an interview with ABC News. In response to a question about how fighting with Islamic militants affected her thinking Ernst said "What we see going on in Iraq right now — If this current administration had followed guidance from military leaders many years ago, we would not be in this situation."

Then, when asked whether she supports airstrikes that U.S. forces have been conducting, Ernst said if U.S. troops had remained in Iraq longer this wouldn't be the current situation.

"I can say is—What I would have supported is leaving additional troops in Iraq longer, and perhaps we wouldn’t have this situation today," Ernst said.


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/joni-ernst-troops-iraq-militants-airstrikes

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iowa GOP Senate Candidate: U.S. Troops Should Have Stayed In Iraq 'Longer' (Original Post) RandySF Aug 2014 OP
was he going to pay for it, himself and comfort the parents of dead soldiers and pay for the benefit hollysmom Aug 2014 #1
Sure. I'm sure a few thousand troops wouldn't have been a permanent TwilightGardener Aug 2014 #2
she can suit up and go over there right now - dems should call her on it nt msongs Aug 2014 #3
We had no choice. Laelth Aug 2014 #4

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
1. was he going to pay for it, himself and comfort the parents of dead soldiers and pay for the benefit
Sat Aug 9, 2014, 01:33 PM
Aug 2014

promised to soldiers, other wise shut the fuck up

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
2. Sure. I'm sure a few thousand troops wouldn't have been a permanent
Sat Aug 9, 2014, 01:52 PM
Aug 2014

target right? Because we still have 30,000 troops in Afghanistan, and they're still targets--but a divided Iraq full of various militias would have been different, right? I'm sure we also could have kept paying for the "Sunni Awakening" ($$$) forever, too. Maliki wasn't going to do it, but we should, right? Pallets and pallets of cash, for years, direct from American taxpayers, to bribe angry Sunnis to stop killing our soldiers. Shut the fuck up, you stupid twit. You know nothing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Iowa GOP Senate Candidate...