Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DFab420

(2,466 posts)
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:42 PM Apr 2012

Question re: trayvon shooting. Was he shot in the back or chest?

When Trayvon Martin was shot in the chest was the entry/exit pattern front to back or back to front??

The reports talk about finding Trayvon Martin face-down.

I haven't read anywhere and am wondering if the idiot police of Sanford are even checking that.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2012/04/09/trayvon-martin-cops-botched-investigation_n_1409277.html?icid=hp_front_top_art

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question re: trayvon shooting. Was he shot in the back or chest? (Original Post) DFab420 Apr 2012 OP
I've heard it mentioned both ways. That's one of the things that bugs me RKP5637 Apr 2012 #1
Een 9 mm have larger exit than entry nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #12
Most people shot from the front fall forward.. pipoman Apr 2012 #2
True? One cop told me that bullet's momentum is powerful mainer Apr 2012 #7
Absolutely false pipoman Apr 2012 #8
Exactly. If a bullet had the recoil to knock someone backwards, it would knock the shooter back too. TheWraith Apr 2012 #18
I've shot many deer with safeinOhio Apr 2012 #13
That might be true with a higher caliber nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #20
True, but if we are to believe the series of events that has been set forward, then Trayvon was on DFab420 Apr 2012 #9
I have no opinion on this case pipoman Apr 2012 #11
"To the side" may be the case. Igel Apr 2012 #16
It's a good question atreides1 Apr 2012 #3
the parents initially said he was shot in the chest librechik Apr 2012 #4
Good question, I haven't heard one way or the other arcane1 Apr 2012 #5
The mortician who prepared his body said there was a bullet wound in the chest. Kaleva Apr 2012 #6
How far away was the gun when fired? Bennyboy Apr 2012 #10
The autopsy should show safeinOhio Apr 2012 #14
Mostly correct with two notations. TheWraith Apr 2012 #19
For the detail oriented a contact shot leaves a welt like burn nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #21
That's because the information has not been released MineralMan Apr 2012 #15
Going from the latest report I read that there was only 1 minute between the 911 call... Kalidurga Apr 2012 #17

RKP5637

(67,078 posts)
1. I've heard it mentioned both ways. That's one of the things that bugs me
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:47 PM
Apr 2012

about all of this, so much is shrouded in mystery. I'm no expert at all, but I've heard that exit wounds are often significantly larger than entry wounds, but I guess that also depends on the type bullets used. Anyway, it seems to me an expert would know that by now, so the silence leads me to wonder WTF.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
12. Een 9 mm have larger exit than entry
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:37 PM
Apr 2012

Also they are infamous for going in and out at close range. If there is no exit, not even that s clear, it weakens self defense even more.

mainer

(12,016 posts)
7. True? One cop told me that bullet's momentum is powerful
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:59 PM
Apr 2012

and getting shot in the chest would fling you backwards.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
8. Absolutely false
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:08 PM
Apr 2012

Most people when shot in front bend forward, then fall forward..

edit..the flying backward stuff is in the movies

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
18. Exactly. If a bullet had the recoil to knock someone backwards, it would knock the shooter back too.
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:00 PM
Apr 2012

People getting blown off their feet by being shot, even with the most powerful weapons, is the stuff of hollywood fantasy.

safeinOhio

(32,623 posts)
13. I've shot many deer with
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:44 PM
Apr 2012

various size bullets and have never seen one pushed back by the shot. They either dip and then run away, or drop straight down.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
20. That might be true with a higher caliber
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:55 PM
Apr 2012

Than a nine mil. (40 maybe, 45 has a slightly better chance, slightly better is the operative word, a lot of physics has to be just right for that to happen, and it is still highly unlikely)

Was he a weapons master for a film studio though, favorite film trick, even with lowly 25 caliber.

That is where that fantasy, and it is mostky one, comes from.

DFab420

(2,466 posts)
9. True, but if we are to believe the series of events that has been set forward, then Trayvon was on
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:32 PM
Apr 2012

top of Zimmerman "bashing his head on the pavement" IF George shot Trayvon while he was on the bottom facing him, wouldn't he then either have to (and forgive me for being blunt) push the dead body either back or to the side? leaving it in a postion NOT face down?

It just seems like another HUGE hole in George Zimmerman's story

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
11. I have no opinion on this case
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:35 PM
Apr 2012

just isn't enough information out about it...it certainly doesn't mean anything by itself.

Igel

(35,268 posts)
16. "To the side" may be the case.
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:57 PM
Apr 2012

I can 't know. Haven't kept up with the mounds of pointless speculation and half-truths.

But if you push somebody off of you you could roll them or slide them. If you slide them, they're not usually, I'd think, wind up on their side. You'd slide the most inconvenient part of the corpse off first and then pull out from under the rest.

Gee, that sounds a lot grosser than I intended.

atreides1

(16,063 posts)
3. It's a good question
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:51 PM
Apr 2012

The ME's report is one of the few items in this case that hasn't been leaked, yet!

That's where the answer would be, and it could be why the head of the governor's "Task Force" has decided against a Grand Jury hearing.

It gives the authorities more time to fuck this investigation up, and let Zimmerman walk...or to guarantee they have enough to get a conviction...who the hell knows anymore!

librechik

(30,673 posts)
4. the parents initially said he was shot in the chest
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:52 PM
Apr 2012

we still don't have access to full police reports about the wound.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
5. Good question, I haven't heard one way or the other
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:53 PM
Apr 2012

Maybe the info is out there and I missed it, but I haven't seen anything that even hints whether he was shot in the front or back

Kaleva

(36,235 posts)
6. The mortician who prepared his body said there was a bullet wound in the chest.
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 12:58 PM
Apr 2012

But he couldn't tell if it was an exit or entry wound. As he got the body after the autopsy, he couldn't be certain if there was or had been other bullet wounds.

 

Bennyboy

(10,440 posts)
10. How far away was the gun when fired?
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:32 PM
Apr 2012

Anyone do ballistics tests to see if it was at point blank or from any distance?

safeinOhio

(32,623 posts)
14. The autopsy should show
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:47 PM
Apr 2012

is there are any powder burns on the body. Less than 3 feet there will be powder burns.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
19. Mostly correct with two notations.
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:03 PM
Apr 2012

One, if the muzzle of the weapon were directly in contact with the body when it was fired, there wouldn't be any powder burns as such, but a "contact shot" leaves its own tell-tale marks.

The distance of the powder burns will also vary depending on the weapon used and barrel length, but "about three feet" is a good rule of thumb.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
21. For the detail oriented a contact shot leaves a welt like burn
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 04:01 PM
Apr 2012

Follwing mostly the muzzle...

The two patients we took care off, they took photos with muzzle against them in ICU...they were treated as second degree burns.

They did remove some powder embedded in the tissue when they debriefed in the OR...of note, not visible at first check.

They should have done that during the autopsy.

At this point I even wonder if the ME did all.

MineralMan

(146,241 posts)
15. That's because the information has not been released
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:12 PM
Apr 2012

to the public. That's pretty much standard procedure. It will be gone over thoroughly at the trial, though, or even in a civil suit.

Too often, we expect to know stuff that isn't usually released.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
17. Going from the latest report I read that there was only 1 minute between the 911 call...
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:00 PM
Apr 2012

and Trayvon being shot, it is hard to say. However, if you think about it, it is most likely that he was shot in the chest. Zimmerman probably grabbed him threw him on the ground sat on him and shot him in the chest. It would be very hard to fit any other kind of scenario in that one minute. Zimmerman would have barely had time to confront him verbally. One minute is a guy is on top of you if you eventually shoot him in the chest withing a minute, that means you flipped him quick so as to not get blood on your clothes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question re: trayvon shoo...