Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:41 PM Apr 2012

How does today's Republican Party differ from the John Birch Society of the sixties?

Or does it differ at all? Back in the sixties and seventies they were ostracized for being so radical.. Are they still ostracized or or they now main stream Republicans?

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

pinto

(106,886 posts)
3. At the rate they're going the Republican Party may well be as irrelevant tomorrow
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:52 PM
Apr 2012

as the John Birch Society is today. One can hope...

Johonny

(20,836 posts)
4. their boothes are now right next two each other
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:53 PM
Apr 2012

at the local fair I go to. There's a Libertarian, John Birch, Teaparty, NRA, a couple Christian groups, then the Republican party. All lined up signing up voters. On the other side is the Democratic party booth. When your selling crap I guess it helps to flood the market with names.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
6. Only found a few differences between the two at the JBS wiki page.
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:05 PM
Apr 2012

"The society opposes "one world government", and has an immigration reduction view on immigration reform. It opposes the United Nations, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), and other free trade agreements. They argue the U.S. Constitution has been devalued to favor of political and economic globalization, and that such alleged trend is not accidental. It cites the existence of the Security and Prosperity Partnership as evidence of a push towards a North American Union."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society

Aside from those issues everything else JBS stands for is endorsed by the republican party as well.

"The society upholds an originalist interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, which it identifies with fundamentalist Christian principles, seeks to limit governmental powers, and opposes wealth redistribution, and economic interventionism.

The society opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming it violated the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and overstepped individual states' rights to enact laws regarding civil rights.

One of the founding members was Fred Koch.

...both the U.S. and Soviet governments are controlled by the same furtive conspiratorial cabal of internationalists, greedy bankers, and corrupt politicians. If left unexposed, the traitors inside the U.S. government would betray the country's sovereignty to the United Nations for a collectivist New World Order, managed by a 'one-world socialist government.

Key society causes of the 1970s included opposition to both the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and to the establishment of diplomatic ties with the People's Republic of China.

The Society has been active in supporting the auditing of, and aims to eventually dismantle, the Federal Reserve System. The JBS believes that the U.S. Constitution gave only Congress the ability to coin money, and did not intend for it to delegate this power to a banking monopoly, or to transform it into a fiat currency not backed by gold or silver. The JBS was a co-sponsor of the 2010 Conservative Political Action Conference, ending its decades-long exile from the mainstream conservative movement.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
11. A hair more "populist" is probably a bit more accurate but sadly what you assert
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 04:52 PM
Apr 2012

is essentially true.

2012 Republican mainstream is more off the reservation than the 1960's extremist that the 1960's mainstream right used to keep on a leash.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
13. Todays bunch are much better funded and are treated by the media as mainstream...that wasn't the....
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 11:38 PM
Apr 2012

case with the John Birch Society back in the day.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How does today's Republic...