Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alsame

(7,784 posts)
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:38 PM Aug 2014

Ferguson police won’t identify officer who shot and killed Michael Brown

Ferguson police won’t identify officer who shot and killed Michael Brown

The Missouri police officer who shot and killed Michael Brown over the weekend has yet to be identified. And while the name was expected to be released Tuesday, authorities in Ferguson, Mo., now say they won’t be identifying the officer for the time being.

Timothy Zoll, a spokesman for the Ferguson Police Department, told The Washington Post that the name won’t be released because of threats made against Ferguson police officers on social media sites.

The officer involved in the incident has been placed on paid administrative leave. There is no timetable for when police could release the officer’s name, Zoll said.

A group claiming to be associated with the hacking collective Anonymous said Tuesday that it knew the name of the officer and was working to be sure it had the right person before identifying him. This group also said it had launched cyberattacks on the city of Ferguson’s Web sites following the police response to looting on Sunday night.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/08/12/ferguson-police-wont-identify-officer-who-shot-and-killed-michael-brown/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ferguson police won’t identify officer who shot and killed Michael Brown (Original Post) alsame Aug 2014 OP
Ironic that a group calling itself 'Anonymous' wants to identify someone. randome Aug 2014 #1
Shouldn't it be public record? Faux pas Aug 2014 #2
Smart move considering the death threats against him seveneyes Aug 2014 #3
The officer's name is relevant and will have to be made public record at some point stranger81 Aug 2014 #4
Any other murder suspect would be identified. Downwinder Aug 2014 #5
If the roles were reversed you'd be goddamned right about that... PoutrageFatigue Aug 2014 #6
He's A Pig, Not A Murder Suspect SoCalMusicLover Aug 2014 #7
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
1. Ironic that a group calling itself 'Anonymous' wants to identify someone.
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:42 PM
Aug 2014

There is no way this can be swept under the rug. Cyberattacks won't help the situation at all.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.
[/center][/font][hr]

Faux pas

(14,668 posts)
2. Shouldn't it be public record?
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:47 PM
Aug 2014

Chicken shits. All bold and ballsy when they're murdering an innocent.

stranger81

(2,345 posts)
4. The officer's name is relevant and will have to be made public record at some point
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:53 PM
Aug 2014

if there is ever a trial. Chances are this isn't this isn't his first rodeo.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
7. He's A Pig, Not A Murder Suspect
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 01:29 PM
Aug 2014

One of their own, so they're going to stand by him as long as they can.

And he also gets paid leave. Nice gig if you can get it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ferguson police won’t ide...