How Money Warps U.S. Foreign Policy
On Sunday, when Hillary Clinton used an interview with Jeffrey Goldberg to take pointedly more hawkish stances than President Obama on Syria, Iran, and Gaza, observers chalked it up to her presidential ambitions. As one Democratic operative told Politico, Clintons advisors are good poll readers. On Tuesday, when Rand Paul declined to oppose U.S. airstrikes in Iraq, commentators interpreted it the same way.
The assumption that hawkishness is politically smart is deeply ingrained in the medias coverage of the 2016 presidential race. But its bizarre. Because in both parties, the polling data is overwhelming: Americans think U.S. foreign policy is too hawkish already. Foreign policy has always been more elite-driven, and more insulated from public opinion, than domestic policy. But todays elite-mass gap is the largest in decades. And regardless of your foreign-policy perspective, thats a problem for American democracy.
Think about the issues on which Hillary put distance between herself and Obama. She was particularly sharp in her criticism of the presidents reluctance to arm Syrias rebels. But this supposedly shrewd political maneuver puts Hillary in the company of a mere 20 percent of the population. The last time the Pew Research Center asked Americans whether they support military aid to Syrias rebels, 20 percent said yes and a whopping 70 percent said no. When respondents were asked in the same poll to evaluate a series of statements about Syria, the most popular was the U.S. military is already too overcommitted.
Hillary also took a harder line than Obama on Irans right to enrich uraniuma harder line that would make it harder to reach a final nuclear deal with Tehran. As with Syria, many commentators considered Hillarys more hawkish stance to be politically astute. But again, the public is actually closer to Obama. According to a University of Maryland poll in July, 61 percent of Americans support a deal that would limitbut not prohibitIranian enrichment, while only 35 percent support increasing sanctions in an effort to eliminate Tehrans enriched uranium altogether.
more
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/08/how-money-warps-us-foreign-policy/376035/