Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums“‘Babies, you can’t kill them, but you can starve them!’ Rand Paul for President”.
Lets take one example, unearthed by Matt Breunig: Do libertarians have any responsibilities to their children? Those of use unfettered by a deep study of the Austrian school might think that this question is pretty well settled in American politics. Thats probably because weve been marinating in moocher culture, at least according to one of Rons favorite economists, Murray Rothbard. Writing in his seminal work, The Ethics of Liberty, on the topic of consequences of spreading around ones semen, Murray says this:
Let me translate from the native Austrian: Kids, theyre such a pain in the asswhat the fuck can we do with them? Well, we cant kill the little shits, because freedom. But the devil government cant make us feed the little ankle biters because theyre fully formed free agents the minute they exit their baby mommas vaginas (so, obviously, they should be able to fend for themselves). However, we can definitely starve themespecially the mal-formed and/or ugly ones. I do realize that the more squeamish among you might be worried about a libertarian baby holocaust. You wimps should think about this: in my free market paradise, the good looking ones will get a decent price at the baby auction, so most of you assholes will just sell the little parasites.
To put it in bumper sticker terms: Babies, you cant kill them, but you can starve them! Rand Paul for President.
http://www.balloon-juice.com/2014/08/15/rands-baby-daddy-problem/
Applying our theory to parents and children, this means that a parent does not have the right to aggress against his children, but also that the parent should not have a legal obligation to feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights. The parent therefore may not murder or mutilate his child, and the law properly outlaws a parent from doing so. But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die.[4] The law, therefore, may not properly compel the parent to feed a child or to keep it alive.[5] (Again, whether or not a parent has a moral rather than a legally enforceable obligation to keep his child alive is a completely separate question.) This rule allows us to solve such vexing questions as: should a parent have the right to allow a deformed baby to die (e.g., by not feeding it)?[6] The answer is of course yes, following a fortiori from the larger right to allow any baby, whether deformed or not, to die. (Though, as we shall see below, in a libertarian society the existence of a free baby market will bring such neglect down to a minimum.)
Let me translate from the native Austrian: Kids, theyre such a pain in the asswhat the fuck can we do with them? Well, we cant kill the little shits, because freedom. But the devil government cant make us feed the little ankle biters because theyre fully formed free agents the minute they exit their baby mommas vaginas (so, obviously, they should be able to fend for themselves). However, we can definitely starve themespecially the mal-formed and/or ugly ones. I do realize that the more squeamish among you might be worried about a libertarian baby holocaust. You wimps should think about this: in my free market paradise, the good looking ones will get a decent price at the baby auction, so most of you assholes will just sell the little parasites.
To put it in bumper sticker terms: Babies, you cant kill them, but you can starve them! Rand Paul for President.
http://www.balloon-juice.com/2014/08/15/rands-baby-daddy-problem/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 593 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“‘Babies, you can’t kill them, but you can starve them!’ Rand Paul for President”. (Original Post)
phantom power
Aug 2014
OP
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)1. ! nt.