Congress Will Review The Transfer Of Military Weapons To Police Forces After Ferguson
Last edited Sun Aug 17, 2014, 03:33 PM - Edit history (2)
In the aftermath of clashes between heavily armed police forces and protesters in Ferguson, MO, the Senate will review the nearly twenty-five year old law that promotes the transfer of surplus military goods to police forces, the head of the Senate Armed Services Committee said on Friday.
The tensions in Ferguson after the death of teenager Michael Brown at the hands of the police in a shooting that still has many questions left unresolved have been punctuated by the collision of protesters and the Ferguson police force. On Wednesday evening, the local police displayed a wide-ranging array of gear that would normally be considered outside the scope of traditional policing, including armored personnel carriers, high-powered sniper rifles, and sirens capable of emitting deafening noises. Though the Missouri Highway Patrol was brought in to takeover from the local law enforcement, APCs and tear gas were still deployed against demonstrators and looters violating the state-imposed curfew alike, and the images of full body-armor clad police facing unarmed protestors have become iconic.
The level of armament on display was enough to concern Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Specifically, Levin has an issue with how the 1990 law designed to provide this hardware to police in helping out in the War On Drugs has been carried out. Under the so-called 1033 program, more than 8,000 state and local law enforcement agencies have taken part in purchasing more than $4 billion worth of this surplus, according to the Department of Defense. Just how apocable some of this material is for everyday crime-fighting is questionable, as Stars and Stripes noted a “county in Ohio bought an Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle in June for $6,000 — the towering trucks used to protect troops from roadside bombs in Iraq cost the military $535,000 or more apiece.”
“Congress established this program out of real concern that local law enforcement agencies were literally outgunned by drug criminals,” Levin said in a statement released Friday. “We intended this equipment to keep police officers and their communities safe from heavily armed drug gangs and terrorist incidents. Before the defense authorization bill comes to the Senate floor, we will review this program to determine if equipment provided by the Defense Department is being used as intended.”
http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/08/17/3472261/congress-will-review-the-transfer-of-military-weapons-to-police-forces-after-ferguson/
Thank you 2naSalit for the link
Mapping the Spread of the Military’s Surplus Gear
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/08/15/us/surplus-military-equipment-map.html?smid=pl-share&_r=1
= new reply since forum marked as read
I hope you don't mind me putting it in my post
You're quite welcome and I saw the map yesterday... maybe? and knew it would assist your OP in a good way. I hope you get lots of exposure for this info. It truly matters.
individual residences, all too often not the residence intended, and shooting octogenarians and family dogs like they were mad dogs? 
