Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:04 PM Aug 2014

Why they should NOT arrest Michael Brown's killer right away.

Last edited Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:42 PM - Edit history (1)

Once they indict the shooter or put him into custody, they have only 70-90 days to bring him to trial -- or they lose their opportunity. And that isn't a long time to develop a solid case.

It's better to take the time to fully develop the prosecution's case before they arrest him -- and win the case six months from now -- then to arrest him now and have to rush into a trial in 70 days without an absolutely rock-solid case.

Also, there could well be a Federal case here involving the police violation of civil rights laws; if the murder was based on race, as it strongly appears to be, then the Feds could prosecute. But it would take time to develop that case. For one thing, the police department had a filing system that means previous complaints against the officer aren't all in his personnel file -- they're scattered among the cases he worked on. And the Federal autopsy result aren't in yet. All of this is going to take TIME, and shouldn't be rushed to fit the 70 day deadline.

http://www.justanswer.com/criminal-law/1l0gf-time-limit-missouri-right-speedy-trial.html

You have a right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which requires that the trial be held within a certain time frame after a person has been charged with a crime. This right can be waived by asking for additional time for the preparation of your defense.

With limited exceptions, a defendant should be brought to trial in Missouri: Within 70 days of your first appearance on an Information or Indictment; If you are in custody, within 90 days following the beginning of custody.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why they should NOT arrest Michael Brown's killer right away. (Original Post) pnwmom Aug 2014 OP
Bingo n/t sabbat hunter Aug 2014 #1
"70 days isn't a long time to develop a solid case. " 951-Riverside Aug 2014 #2
You're forgetting that there could well be a Federal case, led by Holder, because of the pnwmom Aug 2014 #8
I'm not Holding out or giving in to wishful thinking 951-Riverside Aug 2014 #18
This case has gotten far more publicity. I doubt the Feds will try to sweep this one under the rug. pnwmom Aug 2014 #19
The Kelly Thomas beating got worldwide attention. 951-Riverside Aug 2014 #22
Then why arrange for a grand jury on Wednesday? sadoldgirl Aug 2014 #3
A grand jury can take months to develop a case. And who told you there couldn't be federal charges? pnwmom Aug 2014 #9
He said murder charges..... BronxBoy Aug 2014 #12
TBH it's not really important that he's arrested right away LittleBlue Aug 2014 #4
If your info is correct, yes indeed. randys1 Aug 2014 #5
I rec'd the OP, but I agree with you also. Not everyone has the patience of a saint. n/t nomorenomore08 Aug 2014 #21
Where did you get that 70-day limit? IIRC, OJ Simpson was not tried for murder until VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #6
Each state has its own limit. I looked it up for Missouri, so I'll find it again. pnwmom Aug 2014 #10
also being out on bail as Simpson was makes a difference dsc Aug 2014 #11
Wait a second: OJ was never out on bail waiting for his trial on murder charges. He had a VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #13
sorry I thought he had bail dsc Aug 2014 #16
Yeah, I probably should just shut up on this topic I think, b/c I'm blowing hot VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #20
Ah, I stand corrected. I'm leaving my post up for thread integrity purposes but VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #14
I realized my OP would be stronger if I added the info you asked about, so I did. Thanks! n/t pnwmom Aug 2014 #17
True but we need to hope the prosecutor is fired up on the case treestar Aug 2014 #7
He will not be indicted, he will not be charged, he will not be tried alcibiades_mystery Aug 2014 #15
 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
2. "70 days isn't a long time to develop a solid case. "
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:13 PM
Aug 2014

Here's the thing, they're not going to develop a case at all. This is why people are pissed off, Cops never ever ever ...ever face justice.

This is like waiting 70 days for the Taliban to develop a solid case against a combatant that just killed a US Soldier. It ain't happening!

There won't be any arrests and as usual the family will get a nice little multi million dollar settlement from the Tax Payers.

The system is utter and complete BULLSHIT!

 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
18. I'm not Holding out or giving in to wishful thinking
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:42 PM
Aug 2014

We've been down this road for far too long to know this cop is going to walk.

At the most the DOJ will look into possible civil rights violations like they did a few months ago in Albuquerque.

Officer Johannes Mehserle only served a year in jail after shooting Oscar Grant in the back on camera. The Killers of Kelly Thomas were brought up on flimsy charges, found not guilty and are free men today.

Back in 2006 Deputy Ivory John Webb Jr was caught on camera telling an unarmed Iraq vet to stand up before shooting him, he too got off scott free.

The system is BULLSHIT and this is why people are pissed off.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
19. This case has gotten far more publicity. I doubt the Feds will try to sweep this one under the rug.
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:45 PM
Aug 2014
 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
22. The Kelly Thomas beating got worldwide attention.
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:51 PM
Aug 2014

In the end his mom got 1 million and the cops got off.

Same thing with the shooting of James Boyd in Albuquerque. The DOJ actually came to Albuquerque after that but didnt do JACK SHIT! except say there were civil rights violations.

The DOJ is nothing more than a carrot on a stick. The point is to keep the masses following that carrot stick for 2 years until the media attention dies down and they can reach a settlement with the family.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
3. Then why arrange for a grand jury on Wednesday?
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:13 PM
Aug 2014

Besides, I think that the DA will want to sweep the whole thing under the table. Therefore it would be in his interest to go fix all this up as soon as possible. Am I wrong? After all the Feds cannot convict Wilson of murder as I learned here on DU.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
9. A grand jury can take months to develop a case. And who told you there couldn't be federal charges?
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:28 PM
Aug 2014

Of course there could be -- based on Federal civil rights violations, which would include a race-based murder by a policeman.

http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/local/2014/08/13/federal-civil-rights-investigation-michael-brown-ferguson/14019767/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014873992

BronxBoy

(2,286 posts)
12. He said murder charges.....
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:48 PM
Aug 2014

I've heard the feds can't bring murder charges but I know nothing about this

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
4. TBH it's not really important that he's arrested right away
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:14 PM
Aug 2014

That's mob thinking.

The most important thing is to conduct a thorough investigation and do things by the book. Arresting someone to make people feel better isn't a great idea.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
5. If your info is correct, yes indeed.
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:16 PM
Aug 2014

What obviously has the AA community up in arms is HISTORY...

A history of Trayvon Martin and Jordan Davis just to mention a couple.

It is in places like this little town in MO where African American's have been on the short end of justice for decades, centuries.

 

VanGoghRocks

(621 posts)
6. Where did you get that 70-day limit? IIRC, OJ Simpson was not tried for murder until
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:22 PM
Aug 2014

long after 70 days had passed from the day of his arrest. (Although OJ was tried in California and this is Missouri, I can't imagine that the time limit varies that widely between states.)

Do you have a source for this?

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
10. Each state has its own limit. I looked it up for Missouri, so I'll find it again.
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:30 PM
Aug 2014

And the other thing that delays trials, like OJ Simpson's trial, is that the DEFENSE is perfectly free to ask for a continuance, and they often do. It can often be an advantage for a defense to prolong things. But the prosecution must meet its deadline no matter what, because the Constitution guarantees the right to a speedy trial -- unless waived by the defendant.

http://www.justanswer.com/criminal-law/1l0gf-time-limit-missouri-right-speedy-trial.html

You have a right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which requires that the trial be held within a certain time frame after a person has been charged with a crime. This right can be waived by asking for additional time for the preparation of your defense.

With limited exceptions, a defendant should be brought to trial in Missouri: Within 70 days of your first appearance on an Information or Indictment; If you are in custody, within 90 days following the beginning of custody.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
11. also being out on bail as Simpson was makes a difference
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:46 PM
Aug 2014

and actually Simpson did get a speedy trial. Probable cause hearing July 7, arraignment july 27, jury questioning in Oct.

 

VanGoghRocks

(621 posts)
13. Wait a second: OJ was never out on bail waiting for his trial on murder charges. He had a
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:02 PM
Aug 2014

cushy berth at LA County, but I don't think he was ever released on bail.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
16. sorry I thought he had bail
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:34 PM
Aug 2014

but regardless he did have a speedy trial (in the sense it started fast not that it finished fast)

 

VanGoghRocks

(621 posts)
20. Yeah, I probably should just shut up on this topic I think, b/c I'm blowing hot
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:46 PM
Aug 2014

air. as our gracious OP deftly pointed out.

I actually think now that the OP may have a point, although I'm still noodling it.

Thanks for responding.

 

VanGoghRocks

(621 posts)
14. Ah, I stand corrected. I'm leaving my post up for thread integrity purposes but
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:05 PM
Aug 2014

your explanation and detail makes total, absolute sense. Lesson to VGR: Maybe VGR should look things up myself before popping off!

Thanks again for taking the time to reply with such diligence. Gives your original argument even more heft, imo.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
7. True but we need to hope the prosecutor is fired up on the case
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:24 PM
Aug 2014

Remember how some thought the prosecutor was not really trying very hard on Zimmerman.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
15. He will not be indicted, he will not be charged, he will not be tried
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:05 PM
Aug 2014

The county prosecutor is acting as defense counsel for Darren Wilson. The Ferguson PD and the St. Louis County PD are functioning as HIS private investigators and public relations team.

Seventy days?



He'll never even be booked.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why they should NOT arres...