Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 09:52 AM Aug 2014

History Says Ferguson Police Officer Likely Won't Be Charged For Shooting

This is a sad commentary on the US. We hire murderous thugs to police us and then let them get away with murder. There are no consequences for cops murdering whomsoever they want.

History Says Ferguson Police Officer Likely Won't Be Charged For Shooting

By Dylan Scott PublishedA ugust 19, 2014, 8:48 AM EDT 862 views

If history is any guide, the Ferguson, Mo., police officer who shot an unarmed black teenager on Aug. 9 is not likely to be charged -- much less convicted -- for the shooting.

Officer Darren Wilson left town in the days since he shot Michael Brown while multiple federal and local investigations are ongoing. The Brown family's attorneys have argued that the findings of their independent autopsy showed that Wilson should have already been arrested.

But he hasn't been -- and those familiar with the history of police-involved deaths say that a convergence of both U.S. law and cultural norms put the odds against it.

"It is really hard to convict a police officer. They get a super presumption of innocence," Laurie Levenson, a former federal prosecutor who is now a law professor at Loyola University in Los Angeles, told TPM. She was involved in a grand jury investigation of an officer-involved death, she said, but it never went to trial.

...


TPM Link
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
History Says Ferguson Police Officer Likely Won't Be Charged For Shooting (Original Post) MohRokTah Aug 2014 OP
What amazes me is... malthaussen Aug 2014 #1
So far the evidence is not overwhelming, nor exonerating 4139 Aug 2014 #2
I disagree with you... Punkingal Aug 2014 #3
You a cop??? blkmusclmachine Aug 2014 #8
No, just responding to... 4139 Aug 2014 #11
Civil Rights violation case - "Wrongful death". BumRushDaShow Aug 2014 #4
As more and more time goes by, I've been wondering Ineeda Aug 2014 #5
I would like to see him turn himself in. joanbarnes Aug 2014 #6
There's this whole "Good ol' Boy" Network... blkmusclmachine Aug 2014 #7
But the number of cases of obvious police brutality against and tblue37 Aug 2014 #9
Duh! RobertEarl Aug 2014 #10
Malice Green etherealtruth Aug 2014 #12

malthaussen

(17,184 posts)
1. What amazes me is...
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 10:14 AM
Aug 2014

... it's not just a slight leaning towards the police, it is overwhelming. You'd think they'd lose once in awhile, but even when the evidence is overwhelming, they get a pass. Something very wrong there.

-- Mal

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
3. I disagree with you...
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 10:40 AM
Aug 2014

6 bullets into an unarmed kid....that is overwhelming. It's way over the top, and there is no defense for the cop, IMHO.

4139

(1,893 posts)
11. No, just responding to...
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 08:12 PM
Aug 2014

..."but even when the evidence is overwhelming, "

WMDs were overwhelming, evidence of the atlantic park bombing was overwhelming...

Need more 'real' info rather than the leak of the day

BumRushDaShow

(128,771 posts)
4. Civil Rights violation case - "Wrongful death".
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 10:50 AM
Aug 2014

They can bankrupt the county if they want (where it would most likely be settled out of court).

Ineeda

(3,626 posts)
5. As more and more time goes by, I've been wondering
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 08:28 AM
Aug 2014

If something (more) nefarious is going on. I'm not normally a CT person, but I know nothing about this cop, really. He's white, 28, been on the force 6 years. Two photos, both taken at the same event. And that's it. So: Married? Children? Resident of Ferguson? Any other family? Where are they?

He's been whisked away, on paid leave. The repercussions of his inhumane, criminal act will affect him as long as he in the community, especially if he's acquitted (if actually charged, of course.) So has he 'disappeared'? I know the Blue Line knows where he is, but does anyone else? Enough time has passed to lay the groundwork for his new life somewhere else where he won't be recognized.

tblue37

(65,290 posts)
9. But the number of cases of obvious police brutality against and
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 07:31 PM
Aug 2014

murder of civilians, especially black men, should mean that the public and the justice system are more suspicious of the cops in such cases, rather than extending to them a "super presumption of innocence.".

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
10. Duh!
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 07:36 PM
Aug 2014

And that is exactly why people are protesting. They want Justice. They know if they return to the regular programming, Justice will never be served. They are hoping and working toward the idea that this time there will be a different outcome.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
12. Malice Green
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 08:17 PM
Aug 2014
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malice_Green

Malice Green was a resident of Detroit, Michigan who died while in police custody after being arrested by Detroit police officers Walter Budzyn and Larry Nevers on November 5, 1992 during a traffic stop. Both officers were later convicted for Green's death. The official cause of death was ruled due to blunt force trauma to his head. Green allegedly failed to relinquish a vial of crack cocaine. Nevers struck Green in the head with his flashlight approximately 14 times during the struggle which, according to the official autopsy, resulted in his death.

Budzyn and Nevers were tried together in Detroit after the judge denied a change of venue. The coroner did not disclose the second exculpatory report to the defense. The Appeals ruling noted: "...the civilian witnesses [for the prosecution] all had either consumed alcohol or cocaine sometime before witnessing the exchange, three of them were friends with Green (Fletcher, Hollins, and Pace), and there was some suggestion from their testimony that they had reason to dislike these officers." Budzyn and Nevers were not given separate trials, but were allowed separate juries. A high-ranking local NAACP member sat on one jury during the trial, adding suspicion to the circumstances surrounding the officers' convictions. Both juries were composed of a majority of black citizens (two whites on Nevers' jury, one on Budzyn's), but both juries reached unanimous verdicts.


I have some hope
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»History Says Ferguson Pol...