Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,980 posts)
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 12:23 PM Aug 2014

St. Louis County grand jury: I was on it in 2007, and here's what I learned

.............

Remember: the vast majority of witnesses that McCulloch’s prosecuting team brings to the grand jury are police officers. He relies on them to make his cases. They are his allies. It seems clear that he has to be reluctant to piss them off by indicting a police officer for what Darren Wilson purportedly did. (By the way, unlike some people, I don't believe that the fact that McCulloch's father was a cop--killed in the line of duty--presents a conflict of interest. But I do wonder if there's a question of loyalty here, because of McCulloch's reliance on cops as witnesses in other cases.)

McCulloch has options: He can present the case against Wilson any way he wants, to get the outcome he wants. Depending on who testifies, and what evidence is brought in, he can make it look like excessive force by Wilson, or he can make it look like a justified shooting in the line of duty. He can present the case in all its nuanced details, or he can streamline it. He can bring in eyewitnesses—or not. He can show the infamous convenience-store videotape—or not. The length and tone of the case is entirely up to him. [We hear, in news reports that McCullough is saying that the case will take more than one day to present. If that’s true, it could mean that he is preparing a thorough and even-handed case--which is what citizens should expect.]

The grand jury can ask as many questions as it wants, and I’m sure they will, if they are doing their jobs as directed. But, as it has been said many times, a good prosecuting attorney can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. However, that assertion also implies the inverse, as well: If the prosecutor doesn’t want an indictment, he or she can make that happen, too.

So, I’ll be watching closely. If there is no indictment in the Darren Wilson case, it could be because the prosecutor himself didn’t want it and presented the weakest possible case. (We will never know, as St. Louis County grand jury deliberations are secret—you’re not supposed to talk about them outside of the jury room. If there is a subsequent trial, the case presented by the prosecution will be indicative of what transpire in the grand jury hearing, as prosecutors often practice their court cases on the grand jury.)

.......


the rest:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/08/19/1322955/-St-Louis-County-grand-jury-I-was-on-it-in-2007-and-here-s-what-I-learned

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
St. Louis County grand jury: I was on it in 2007, and here's what I learned (Original Post) kpete Aug 2014 OP
How hard would it be to move the venue? That's often... TreasonousBastard Aug 2014 #1
That doesn't usually happen until pintobean Aug 2014 #6
I don't think the prosecutor in Irene Garza's case wanted an indictment and he didn't get one. factsarenotfair Aug 2014 #2
Kick and Rec riqster Aug 2014 #3
just saw the CNN report that McCulloch wont step aside bigtree Aug 2014 #4
That's why the DOJ is important bigbrother05 Aug 2014 #5
A civil suit is also a possibility. Jim Lane Aug 2014 #9
This case stands to change things for St. Louis County in a positive way. logosoco Aug 2014 #7
St. Louis County has charged and prosecuted pintobean Aug 2014 #8
 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
6. That doesn't usually happen until
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 01:30 PM
Aug 2014

after charges are filed. The investigation has already been transferred from FPD to county PD.

factsarenotfair

(910 posts)
2. I don't think the prosecutor in Irene Garza's case wanted an indictment and he didn't get one.
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 12:36 PM
Aug 2014

2004: After pressure from Garza's family, District Attorney Guerra brings the case before a grand jury. Presentation of the case is criticized because Feit, O'Brien and Tacheny are not subpoenaed to testify. The grand jury votes not to indict Feit.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/31/justice/garza-cold-case-timeline/

bigbrother05

(5,995 posts)
5. That's why the DOJ is important
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 01:22 PM
Aug 2014

Just like in the sixties, violation of civil rights is a federal offense and is usually brought after a state fails to act.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
9. A civil suit is also a possibility.
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 03:25 PM
Aug 2014

In a civil suit, the Fifth Amendment privilege won't apply. A defendant or other witness who might face criminal prosecution can still refuse to testify, but the difference is that the jury is permitted to draw an inference of guilt from the assertion of the privilege.

logosoco

(3,208 posts)
7. This case stands to change things for St. Louis County in a positive way.
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 01:31 PM
Aug 2014

Or McCulloch could make a weak case, defending the officer involved and the subsequent actions of the county police.

I would like to see everything come to light and start on a new direction, away from the militarization of the police. But, if Bob doesn't make the case, it won't happen here and now. Which I am thinking is not going to go well for America as a whole.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
8. St. Louis County has charged and prosecuted
Tue Aug 19, 2014, 01:35 PM
Aug 2014

their own officers before. I really don't see a problem here.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»St. Louis County grand ju...