General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould your Doctor be able to force you to "x" number of appointments?
I was recently unpleasantly surprised when my Doctor's office told me that I would be required to have at least one appointment every three months, rain or shine. If I didn't fulfill that quota I could be dropped as a patient.
I was also surprised at the number of comments I received on a posting about this which appeared to approve of this practice. Only a small number were shocked, as I had been. So this poll:
Do you agree that your Doctor can require you to a minimum number of office visits per year? (If you don't comply you will be dropped as his/her patient)
15 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
I somewhat agree | |
1 (7%) |
|
I completely agree | |
0 (0%) |
|
I somewhat disagree | |
0 (0%) |
|
I completely disagree | |
14 (93%) |
|
Other | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,833 posts)SharonAnn
(13,772 posts)If you have a chronic disease that requires monitoring and testing, then a doctor might require this to encourage a level of compliance with the medical treatment.
One case: A diabetic whose blood sugar was not controlled, only went to the doctor when he had a noticeable problem. Despite the warnings, the information, and even the lectures, the patient refused to do what was necessary and take the medication that was provided. Naturally, the end was not good. Lost his legs, then heart attack while recovering. I could see a doctor setting the ground rules for compliance with medical treatments.
Aristus
(66,316 posts)Thank you, SharonAnn.
Now, I don't 'require' my patients to fulfill a certain number of office visits. I recommend them based on the severity of their chronic condition, and on the type of treatment protocol is indicated for it. I say to my patients: "I'd like to see you back here in 3 months so we can check your A1C and cholesterol levels again. We'll see if there's any progress." - not: "Get your ass back here when I say so, or I'll rage-murder you and your whole family so hard no one will even remember you!"
Yeah, there are some doctors out there with bad bedside manners. Find another provider.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)If patients understand that it's in their best interests there is an incentive to come back.
However, medical professionals must also be sensitive to factors that may be making the patient resistant like cost not just for co-pays but for uncompensated time off work and negative work scores for being unreliable, or the difficulty of getting to a doctor's appointment for people who don't own cars or can't drive.
If a patient has such concerns, perhaps the patient and provider can work out an alternative but that's not going to happen if the provider takes the my-way-or-the-highway approach.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)the other way around. All patient's have rights and they should be respected.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Drs. don't seem to want to heal people any longer. They want to find chronic conditions then convince people that they need certain meds in order to live. Then they keep you running back every 3 months in order to get the meds you have been told you need to survive.
Then, you can't actually get into see your Dr. when you're sick because the Dr is all filled up two weeks out. So you go to urgent care when you're sick, and pay a higher copay. Then on your followup 2 weeks later, because you couldn't actually see your Dr when you were sick, you go to the office, sign in and sit in the waiting room. I guess Drs finally paid attention to patients complaints about the long waits in the waiting room and now they take you in right away and then you wait for over an hour for the Dr to come into the exam room. Then you're told you went to the wrong urgent care facility because your Dr is not affiliated with them and there is nothing they can do but tell you that you need a bunch of tests and give you referrals to all their Dr friends for things you didn't go to the Dr for. All the while ignoring the fact that you went for a follow up for when you got sick in the first place.
I don't have the time or the personality to run around town to get the run around from Drs and their employees (snotty receptionists mostly) who act as if they are doing you a favor by letting you wait in one of their exam rooms to see the Dr.
Oh, and don't forget to pay first.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)I have a chronic disease (3 actually) and am on some strong meds and oral chemotherapy that may do damage to my kidney and liver, so I have to have blood work done every 3-6 months. If I refuse to do so, my Dr will not continue to authorize refills for the meds.
Tikki
(14,557 posts)Just to say HI, not so much...
Tikki
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)safely prescribe so it is reasonable to say no refill until you are seen sometimes but no I don't agree with ordering people in for visits at any time.
mainer
(12,022 posts)you might turn around and sue him. That's what he's worried about. If you're a noncompliant patient who's hellbent on making yourself sick, then no doctor wants you as a patient.
pinto
(106,886 posts)And, iirc, there are prescribing guidelines for chronic conditions. Those, I think, are every six months at a minimum.
I have to be seen every three months by my primary, at least annually by a specialist
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)specific medical reason why the general practitioner is doing this, then it is wrong.
However, there are definitely reasons why it may be medically indicated to require to see you every few months or even few weeks and if a patient isn't keeping up with that, the doctor may want to drop the patient so as not to enable a patient not taking the proper care of themselves.
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)I work with many psychiatrist offices who require this to make sure their patients are compliant with their medications and treatments.
mainer
(12,022 posts)Just like he's not your slave.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)But would I be likely to continue seeing him? Nope.
Iggo
(47,549 posts)In fact, they send me a monthly mailing telling me how to avoid going to the doctor.
They seem to be happy to sit back and collect my premiums.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)I go through periods when I feel good and haven't had a recent injury and just don't want to see my doctor. But I think he can treat my problems better if he has seen me on a regular basis.
I know my veterinarian really likes that I have her come on a regular schedule to vaccinate and worm my horses. That way if they are sick or get an injury she is familiar with the animals and can diagnosis illnesses or get a better read on how badly injured they are. She also gives preference on emergencies to customers who use her for routine services, so my horses get treated faster when there is a real problem. And she knows that if I call about a colic, it is not because the horse was no wormed regularly so she can immediately rule out that as a cause.
I think human doctors are beginning to pick up how important this is for preventative care. Since this is finally beginning to be a priority in human medicine, that could be part of it. Also, more people are on more drugs for preventative care and many of those need routine monitoring.
So I don't object too much about seeing my GP for routine visits, though every three months seems excessive. But I don't see why I need to go see my dermatologist every six months when I have no ongoing skin problems he needs to treat - and have to pay a bunch for each visit that forces me to wait over an hour to be seen for five minutes.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Individual opinion this way too. Doctored will not make the decision . You are assuming the doctor is making this required when actually the group is telling doctors they will lose pay if they can not meet pt goals on compliance
Also there will be a new entity I have heard about in meetings
Someone who calls or visits to keep tabs on if you are complying with recommendations
Doctors would have to drop pts based on a third party opinion !! Well or not get paid I guess
Xithras
(16,191 posts)I didn't see him for two years once, and had to apply again as a new patient when I visited. Good doctors generally limit the number of patients they accept, and they don't want to waste a "spot" on a patient who isn't serious about maintaining their health.
That said, every three months is pretty low. I've heard of doctors requiring one or two visits a year, but four seems a bit high.
So I agree with the concept, but not with your doctors specific policy.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)and this is one reason why. I learned this lesson with workplace "Your Health, Your Choice" (MONETARY penalization for not COMPLYING)" Wellness Program.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Ms. Toad
(34,062 posts)There are medical conditions that require frequent treatment. Some examples: diabetes, post-transplant care, post-thrombosis care, uncontrolled hypertension. Some medications are unsafe when not monitored regularly.
Doctors may be reluctant to keep a non-compliant patient on, when adequate care requires more frequent visits than the patient is willing to make - because continuing to order medicine without proper monitoring is dangerous (and might even be malpractice).
If a doctor tried to require me to visit more frequently than medically necessary, on the other hand, I would start looking for another doctor.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)for a yearly physical. That seems like a reasonable requirement to me. I can see them wanting to have patients who are actively taking care of their health, and being checked on every so often can be a part of that, but every three months seems like more than necessary. I would be OK if my doctor said every 6 months though I think.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)was wrong. if its because i have a chronic condition, that requires a certain number of visits, i would think the doctors office was in the right.
sorta depends.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)agreement as a condition of getting medical care. It means I can't file a case for malpractice and have it presented before a jury of my peers but instead have an individual decide it. Who chooses that arbitrator (who depends on recurring business from doctors and might be biased) and what is his background? Here in California, a doctor can legally refuse me as a patient if I don't want to sign away my rights to a jury trial. I have yet to meet a doctor who doesn't require this form.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I sure as hell couldn't afford to see him 4 times a year unless somebody else was paying all the bills.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)No doctor can force you to visit him or her. All they can do is drop you as a patient, which is their right.
Not a great bedside manner, but their call.
LiberalArkie
(15,713 posts)So I was doing alright after surgery, Went to the 1st one 2 weeks after surgery. Doc said everything is alright come back in 1 month. 3 minute visit. So I drove the 150 miles a month later, 3 minute visit and doc said everything ok. Come back in a month.
I drove 150 miles the next month for the same 3 minute visit. Never made the next appt. BTW the visits were 3 minutes with a 2 hour waiting room wait.
LuvLoogie
(6,993 posts)What insurance? Family Practice? Cardiologist?
Are you in good health?
jwirr
(39,215 posts)is not the doctor who is making you come. It is often the law and it could also be insurance - either yours or the doctors insurance. No doctor in his/her right mind would prescribe drugs without following up on them.
Also health care has changed. We have gone from go to the doctor when you are sick to preventative health care. The latter requires us to make more visits such as yearly physicals. They are doing it to save money.