Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(33,554 posts)
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:30 PM Aug 2014

How did Corporations ever make money back when

the largest companies like GM, GE and US Steal paid their union workers (40% of the national workforce) $35 to $40 dollars in today's dollars, compared to companies now like Walmart who pay around $10.
I mean they must have just scraped by, they couldn't have been among the bibgest and most profitable companies in the world paying those types of wages.






21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

edhopper

(33,554 posts)
2. They were also paying
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:35 PM
Aug 2014

much more in taxes then too.
Post war America must have been a gloomy place for Corporate America.

global1

(25,239 posts)
3. They Made A Ton Of Money Back Then Because The Economy Was Cooking....
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:35 PM
Aug 2014

we had a robust middle class that spent their wage money and was the fuel to the system.

The corporations just got greedy and here we are.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
4. Well . . . part of that is that the United States was in a different place vis a vis their
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:35 PM
Aug 2014

international competitors. That's not to defend the current trends; but they do show a certain continuation of rigidity of thought. American Companies don't tend to look too far down the road. They didn't in the 60s/70s and they aren't now.

Bryant

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
13. Because other countries don't do as well?
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 02:24 PM
Aug 2014

Germany is pretty big with their exports. If Germany is putting out products and people are buying them, somewhere that's going to mean that people aren't buying products out of some other country.

I have no doubt that there are many more reasons for why this or that happens, but basically we live in a finite world, there are only so many hours in a day, and only so many things to buy. Everyone can't do great at the same time.

 

Sopkoviak

(357 posts)
14. Tariffs and other forms of protectionism.
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 02:29 PM
Aug 2014

Have you ever been to Germany? You've never seen so many "foreign" cars!

Almost all German.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
15. Exports are surely part of it.
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 02:34 PM
Aug 2014

I was in China (Hangzhou area) for 3 1/2 weeks last summer and traveled to Shanghai as well. The clear majority of cars I saw were made by German companies. Benzes, Audis, and BMWs were as common as dirt. Almost every taxi I saw was a VW. But then German automakers have been tailoring versions of their cars for foreign markets for many years.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
16. Because they make a superior product.
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 03:13 PM
Aug 2014

As we did back then.

My point is that American Companies are not forward thinking - rather than trying to solve the problem of paying their workers well, ensuring safety, and making a great product, they are satisfied giving an ok product while giving their employees the shaft.

Bryant

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
5. Average people made more than enough money to
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:38 PM
Aug 2014

buy their products. New car every few years, etc.

Not no more. So they have to find some other way to bleed the masses bone-dry and redistribute their wealth into more "appropriate" pockets for safe-keeping.

 

Sopkoviak

(357 posts)
6. Little or no foreign competition
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:40 PM
Aug 2014

Believe it or not but there was a time when you would see very few foreign cars, televisions were made here and fabrics and clothes came from our own mills and factories.

Hell, we used to export our excess production to the rest of the world.

Ask your grand parents, or me I'm old enough to remember.

RKP5637

(67,102 posts)
9. Yep, that is pretty much the bottom line. The US really had no competition for
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:57 PM
Aug 2014

the most part back then. Now, the US has to compete with the world and until the wage level balances out globally this will continue.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
7. The old fashioned way - They earned it
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:40 PM
Aug 2014

Now it is about making money make you money, share profit over all else and greed from the top.

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
8. The world was a different place
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:51 PM
Aug 2014

Not only was the US one of the few functioning countries after all the wars, but white men were about it for the labor force for a while. Civil rights weren't big yet. Women working outside the home wasn't big yet. The level of automation didn't exist either. Then when more people became available to do the work(both in the US and everywhere else), and then more people weren't needed to do the work, prices are going to fall.

Unions have power when place matters. In a global world that is increasingly placeless, unions aren't going to have the strength they once did.

edhopper

(33,554 posts)
11. A few years ago
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 02:09 PM
Aug 2014

when the economy collapse, and mainly due to their financial divisions.
They had also already shipped most of their jobs out of the US.

So they were bigger and healthier when they paid workers here better wages.

former9thward

(31,965 posts)
17. There was little global competition.
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 03:28 PM
Aug 2014

Now there is. U.S. companies were the top dogs after WW II. Now they no longer are.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
18. CEO-to-worker-pay was lot more equitable than it has been in the last two and half decades.
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 03:30 PM
Aug 2014

CEO-to-worker-pay was lot more equitable than it has been in the last two and half decades.. One of many reasons, I would think...

rock

(13,218 posts)
20. Short answer: they didn't have MBAs
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 04:53 PM
Aug 2014

The super-mis-managers from Hell. Educated and trained to be "managers". Managers of what, you ask? Just managers. Before that, remember, mangers had to know something about the specific business. Now they're taught half-ass methods for running half the business. So their name is a misnomer, they're really Jacks of all trades, Masters of none. They use such non-specific names as generic product development process and widget because they don't know anything specific but they do know a lot of general rules which never apply, such as, the business needs to grow 10-20% a year and quality costs money. I'm probably boring you by now, but you did ask.

You might take a look at

to see the problem.

edhopper

(33,554 posts)
21. So true
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 05:06 PM
Aug 2014

The son of a friend just landed a job at Earnst and Young in the "Company Growth and Developement" Dept.
Granted he went to Wharton, but what the fuck does a 23 year old know about Corporate development strategies.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How did Corporations ever...