= new reply since forum marked as read
Response to Autumn (Reply #13)
There, just wanted to make sure that the selected quotes obviously meant to show that even 'your fave is a warmonger' did not accurately represent her. Now why would anyone want to do that?
But I hope they understand this about the 'left'. IF she gets on board with the forever war crowd, she will no longer have their respect.
For some reason, maybe it's projection a few people here seem to think that once you find a politician who seems to represent you, that you like, you will remain loyal to that person no matter what! NOT SO!
Why on earth would they thing that? It's not about individual personalities, it's about their actions on important issues, not even about their words anymore. We've learned how much words mean in politics.
with all due respect.
Day after day, stirring shit 
Way to many people here trying to stir things up, day after day, the same old shit, all negative and nothing positive. Either they love the doom and gloom or they simply have some kind of agenda that isn't really trying to help keep republicans out of office, but instead trying to depress voters so they won't vote. Either way it doesn't help unite people at all. The one goal should be to replace as many republicans as we can come November, and then start working on the same thing for 2016.
Those who simply want to stir the shit don't really seem to be working towards that kind of a goal. I wonder why?
he gets called a "shit-stirrer". I'm guessing you want him to sit down and shut up and be thankful for the status quo. Good luck with that.
but they have absolutely nothing to do with the reality that exists....
life and certainly politics are not black or white.
wish they were.
carry on
Too much money and power in politics. Too many lying liars in politics in it only for themselves. Bush projecting about activist judges.
And in the end there are people who are convinced beyond a doubt that Hillary's our best choice.
Now I know why I sleep in, in the mornings.
The problem is deep. Not unsolvable but definitely something that will take time and a sustained concerted effort.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12691212
Thanks for thinking of me. I haven't finished the article but so far I agree. I told KoKo that my disappointment is limited because I felt it wouldn't work. That's not to say that I discourage trying, in fact I was a great supporter of this action. But IMHO the problem is that the Financial Elite currently in power think that it's cool to decimate the lower classes. They are too shortsighted (vision hampered by greed) to recognize they are killing the goose. The lower classes don't have the resources nor the leaders to fix this problem. We must find Financial and Intellectual Elitists that recognize that the current path ends in disaster for all. This in no way means we need to stop what we are doing. If nothing else, it keeps the movement alive. It also makes the problems more visible for those that currently don't understand. I hope that made some sense.
...we would find concurrence that the definition of economically viable has dropped from, say, three generations to one quarter, and continues to fall.
And, that the power of the individual has decreased steadily.
Still, we have some areas in which we gain power: video capability on our phones is a greater boon to freedom than public surveillance is an impediment.
That's all I got, I hope there's more.
In the end, organization and finding the common ground are the two most important things that can empower us. This has always been so.
And, the opposition know that and they work to divide.
Carry on, my friend!
