Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,071 posts)
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 12:25 PM Sep 2014

Naomi Klein is right: Unchecked capitalism will destroy civilization

via Grist:


Naomi Klein is right: Unchecked capitalism will destroy civilization
By Joseph Romm

Cross-posted from Climate Progress
19 Sep 2014 10:44 AM


Best-selling progressive journalist Naomi Klein has an important new book out, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. The author of No Logo and The Shock Doctrine now “tackles the most profound threat humanity has ever faced: the war our economic model is waging against life on earth,” as the book jacket aptly puts it.

In diagnosing the unprecedented existential threat humanity faces thanks to our myopia and unbridled greed, Klein has three essential points to make:

1. Because we have ignored the increasingly urgent warnings and pleas for action from climate scientists for a quarter century (!) now, the incremental or evolutionary paths to avert catastrophic global warming that we might have been able to take in the past are closed to us.

2. Humanity faces a stark choice as a result: the end of civilization as we know it or the end of capitalism as we know it.

3. Choosing “unregulated capitalism” over human civilization would be a “morally monstrous” choice — and so the winning message for the climate movement is a moral one.


As an aside, readers may remember that I don’t always agree with Klein on either substance or messaging. And obviously I have quibbles with her book — in particular I am skeptical of some elements of her proposed “cure” (and how she frames them) as I’ll discuss in a later post. But in fairness to Klein, our 25-year dawdling has made the diagnosis (and prognosis) unimaginably graver and thus made all cures look politically implausible, as the pessimistic, do-little “eco-modernists” keep pointing out far too gleefully.

To anyone who thinks attacking unchecked capitalism is not a winning message (when done correctly), I’d urge you to read the advice of Frank Luntz, the GOP’s top messaging guru, on the subject: “don’t say capitalism” because Americans “think capitalism is immoral.”

The great value in the book lies in Klein’s understanding and elaboration of the three essential points above. Indeed I’m not certain any other book has so clearly spelled out these points. And yet these three points are, arguably, the most important ones for climate hawks, for the (misnamed) “intelligentsia,” and, indeed, for all homo sapiens to understand at a deep level, since they clarify the choices we now must make. .................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://grist.org/climate-energy/naomi-klein-is-right-unchecked-capitalism-will-destroy-civilization/



65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Naomi Klein is right: Unchecked capitalism will destroy civilization (Original Post) marmar Sep 2014 OP
Will? Aren't we pretty much at a point of no return with the environment? merrily Sep 2014 #1
"America is the first country to have gone from barbarism to decadence without the usual intervening Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #16
When it comes to climate change it is not just about the USA - we are far beyond no return if we jwirr Sep 2014 #58
It's a pyramid scheme. mb999 Sep 2014 #2
same as it ever was... alterfurz Sep 2014 #5
Great graphic... saved this one! mountain grammy Sep 2014 #14
I have this image on my desktop. blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #61
Capitalism must be regulated to within an inch of its life. Enthusiast Sep 2014 #11
Yes, but how do we wrest the power from the wealthy elite? nm rhett o rick Sep 2014 #53
That is the big question. Enthusiast Sep 2014 #63
We are growing ourselves to death RufusTFirefly Sep 2014 #3
Simple as that. Now let's fix it. nt ladjf Sep 2014 #4
Capitalism will destroy civilization. TBF Sep 2014 #6
Interesting quote from Rosa Luxemburg young_at_heart Sep 2014 #8
But Venezuela is the best example of the attempt, and look at how even DU'ers think about that. Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #19
A look at the income inequality charts will tell you TBF Sep 2014 #22
Look back at the 1920's on 'The Roosevelts' young_at_heart Sep 2014 #7
In-between was Calvin Coolidge Art_from_Ark Sep 2014 #55
bookmarked daleanime Sep 2014 #9
Aided and abetted Maynar Sep 2014 #10
I am really looking forward to reading this. Luminous Animal Sep 2014 #12
How does socialism survive without capitalism? FrodosPet Sep 2014 #13
What 'provides the incentives' now? leftstreet Sep 2014 #20
If you believe your town, neighborhood, etc needs a grocery store or coffeeshop... FrodosPet Sep 2014 #29
sigh leftstreet Sep 2014 #32
Cute cartoon FrodosPet Sep 2014 #33
Where does it come from now? leftstreet Sep 2014 #35
To answer your last question about elaboration of "...a detail oriented question..."........ socialist_n_TN Sep 2014 #42
If you mean that question seriously, rogerashton Sep 2014 #51
Well regulated Capitalism = Socialism + Democracy ReRe Sep 2014 #24
It's not working people who are the lazy ones. Starry Messenger Sep 2014 #25
Lazy commies! BrotherIvan Sep 2014 #26
You ask a lot of questions that I bet you think you have the answers for. rhett o rick Sep 2014 #54
Regulated free enterprise. Capitalism is not the problem - corrupt capitalists are. FrodosPet Sep 2014 #59
I would say IS destroying... marym625 Sep 2014 #15
She's right tooeyeten Sep 2014 #17
Marx said it first, with a clear explanation. With respect to Ms. Naomi Klein. Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #18
DURec leftstreet Sep 2014 #21
+++ TBF Sep 2014 #23
Yuuuuuuuuuup BrotherIvan Sep 2014 #30
Yep this gets a +++ from me too... socialist_n_TN Sep 2014 #43
It doesn't take someone sitting in an ivory tower to understand that Skidmore Sep 2014 #27
We're fucked. The only thing that will save us is a socialist government. Louisiana1976 Sep 2014 #28
I am still trying to figure out HOW it will save us FrodosPet Sep 2014 #31
Why don't you look into it and get back to us with what you find out? eShirl Sep 2014 #45
In theory most people on this board are Democrats of one stripe or another. former9thward Sep 2014 #34
I think you might have forgotten the second part sadoldgirl Sep 2014 #37
The Scandinavian countries are capitalist. former9thward Sep 2014 #39
In theory........ socialist_n_TN Sep 2014 #44
I enjoy reading your posts since I was a communist in my youth. former9thward Sep 2014 #48
Well, I'm not, nor never have been, a Maoist........ socialist_n_TN Sep 2014 #65
In a two-party system we have little choice - TBF Sep 2014 #50
In your post you have slogans that have been around for more than 100 years. former9thward Sep 2014 #56
It's not going to take 100 years with this growth rate - TBF Sep 2014 #60
Perhaps we could start to teach sadoldgirl Sep 2014 #36
Civilization is the resource extraction and concentration mechanism The2ndWheel Sep 2014 #38
K&R nt Mnemosyne Sep 2014 #40
I think civilization will ultimately destroy capitalism. LuvNewcastle Sep 2014 #41
Government is the check on capitalism bhikkhu Sep 2014 #46
Unregulated capitalism, crony capitalism, laissez-faire capitalism, unchecked capitalism, etc. DemocraticWing Sep 2014 #47
I'm looking forward to reading Naomi's book. Uncle Joe Sep 2014 #49
For anything to be done about climate change, the wealthy elite must give up rhett o rick Sep 2014 #52
It's not really altruism vs. greed though, is it? DirkGently Sep 2014 #57
I read on DU she's a drunk. Octafish Sep 2014 #62
IMO, it will take a dotymed Sep 2014 #64

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. Will? Aren't we pretty much at a point of no return with the environment?
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 12:32 PM
Sep 2014

And damned close on a big bunch of other things?

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
16. "America is the first country to have gone from barbarism to decadence without the usual intervening
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 03:02 PM
Sep 2014
"America is the first country to have gone from barbarism to decadence without the usual intervening period of civilization." -  Oscar Wilde

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
58. When it comes to climate change it is not just about the USA - we are far beyond no return if we
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 10:44 AM
Sep 2014

look at the islands in the ocean and maybe the ocean itself. Not to mention Africa.

mb999

(89 posts)
2. It's a pyramid scheme.
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 12:35 PM
Sep 2014

The workers at the bottom support the few moocher billionaire oligarchs at the top. The end result is slavery. Capitalism needs to be heavily regulated so the workers can share in the prosperity they create until it can be replaced with a less barbaric system.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
63. That is the big question.
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 11:46 AM
Sep 2014

If we let them, they will destroy the world economy.

We have one huge glaring historical example of laissez faire, hands off, free market capitalism. It did not go well.

young_at_heart

(3,767 posts)
8. Interesting quote from Rosa Luxemburg
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 02:18 PM
Sep 2014

"Without general elections, without freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, without the free battle of opinions, life in every public institution withers away, becomes a caricature of itself, and bureaucracy rises as the only deciding factor."

TBF

(32,043 posts)
22. A look at the income inequality charts will tell you
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 03:20 PM
Sep 2014

I'm correct - even if people prefer to bury their heads in the sand.

young_at_heart

(3,767 posts)
7. Look back at the 1920's on 'The Roosevelts'
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 02:04 PM
Sep 2014

Capitalism was unchecked while the Republicans were in power (Harding, Hoover) and the country was brought to its knees. There were many "Hooverville's" around the country.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
55. In-between was Calvin Coolidge
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 10:29 AM
Sep 2014

whose most famous quote while President was "The business of America is business".

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
12. I am really looking forward to reading this.
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 02:35 PM
Sep 2014

Unfortunately, her San Francisco Bay Area appearance is sold out.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
13. How does socialism survive without capitalism?
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 02:45 PM
Sep 2014

What exactly is the funding mechanism? Is it the universe's first perpetual motion machine - capable of sustaining purely on its own output?

What provides the incentives to get up and go to work? Will people who get off their butts still be able to get nicer stuff than people who don't? Will slackers be imprisoned for attacking the social order if they are lazy?

What is the mechanism for economic growth? Will there still be free enterprise occupations and business, or is everything completely state owned? If the local development council consists primarily of corrupt dimwits, will there be ways around them?

Uh oh... I just realized, I am not properly worshipping socialism here - red baiting alert!

leftstreet

(36,103 posts)
20. What 'provides the incentives' now?
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 03:18 PM
Sep 2014

If you eliminated the elite profit-takers from our midst, people would still labor. They would teach school, fix teeth, pour concrete, bake cookies, design software, build bridges, clean motel rooms, assemble cars, litigate court cases, and lay carpets.

The only difference is they wouldn't be kicking up the profits from those labors to someone else.

How hard is that to understand?

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
29. If you believe your town, neighborhood, etc needs a grocery store or coffeeshop...
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 04:01 PM
Sep 2014

...where does the start-up capital come from?

Where does the cement pourer get his cement? Where does the dentist get his chair, drill, and x-ray machine?

Without non-governmental economic activity, where does the state road commission get the money to buy the steel for the bridges?

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
33. Cute cartoon
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 06:43 PM
Sep 2014

That shows that SOME capitalists are arrogant vest wearing cigar smoking putzes. Not all, but some.

However, this was not what I asked though. I am asking, "Where does the initial money come from to start an enterprise, such as a manufacturer of goods, or a store, etc, in a socialist system?"

Why does everyone just default to the "fuck the rich assholes" meme and then avoid elaboration whenever I ask a detail oriented question?

leftstreet

(36,103 posts)
35. Where does it come from now?
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 07:01 PM
Sep 2014
"Where does the initial money come from to start an enterprise, such as a manufacturer of goods, or a store, etc,


socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
42. To answer your last question about elaboration of "...a detail oriented question..."........
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 09:47 PM
Sep 2014

Why do you expect people to put together an entire people based system in an internet post? I've got my ideas about the shape of a socialist system as do a lot of others, but the details are worked out by the people and not some "private property" owner.

My idea of where the money would come from for start ups? I can answer that one. It would come from the banks that have been expropriated from the wealthy and nationalized under worker and citizen's control. In addition, the means of production (factories, farms, transportation and distribution) for the commanding heights of the economy would be expropriated and run under workers and citizen's control for the benefit of ALL, not the few profit takers. Eventually, the necessities of life would be planned for without thought for someone's profit only for everyone's needs.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
24. Well regulated Capitalism = Socialism + Democracy
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 03:25 PM
Sep 2014

Unregulated Capitalism = Fascism + No Democracy.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
25. It's not working people who are the lazy ones.
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 03:26 PM
Sep 2014

Don't worry about us. It's the 1% who will perish of idleness.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
26. Lazy commies!
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 03:28 PM
Sep 2014

No one will do anything and all the hard working people will get screwed!!!!!!!!! Oh noes! Let's spread more RW propaganda and see if it goes away.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
54. You ask a lot of questions that I bet you think you have the answers for.
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 10:23 AM
Sep 2014

Why don't you present an actual argument instead of making insinuations via questions?

If you don't think socialism will work, then what do you recommend?

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
59. Regulated free enterprise. Capitalism is not the problem - corrupt capitalists are.
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 10:55 AM
Sep 2014

Retention of a profit motive and distributed responsibility, with a crackdown on fraud and monopolies. Incentivize worker owned enterprises, get more people to have a stake and a reward in success. Taxed at a Goldilocks rate that provides for infrastructure maintenance and improvement and compassion for the infirmed and the elderly, but not so high that it removes incentive and resources for growth and rainy day survival. And more economic education and small business incubators in impoverished areas.

Socialism seems like another monopoly. Supposedly run "For The People", but only a small number of individuals will stand up and assume authority as representatives of the masses. And it would be backed by the governmental powers of confiscation and incarceration.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
27. It doesn't take someone sitting in an ivory tower to understand that
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 03:28 PM
Sep 2014

giving people permission to indulge the greed within them does not lead to healthy communities. When you stop expecting that people treat each other with decency and respect to have more, you end up with cutthroats in power.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
31. I am still trying to figure out HOW it will save us
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 04:36 PM
Sep 2014

Which flavor of socialism will save us? Anarchy or central planned? Worker co-ops or state-owned? What levels of government will own what enterprises? Will my local beer store be owned by the city, county, state, or federal government?

Will there still be microbrews, competing through quality, or just a generic "Volksbiere"?

How do you prevent a black market? Will we have to train the children to turn in their parents for illegal sales of toilet paper and toothbrushes? Will the government have to step up law enforcement to attack private commercial transactions and bartering?

Why won't anyone explain these things? All I hear is "Socialism rocks because fuck rich people!", but the supporters I try to engage never get into details, just hazy predictions about how we, unlike every other nation that has tried and failed, will succeed.

former9thward

(31,973 posts)
34. In theory most people on this board are Democrats of one stripe or another.
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 06:56 PM
Sep 2014

Yet in this thread almost everyone professes some form of socialism or Marxism. The Democratic party has always been a capitalist party and always will be. I know a lot of Democratic activists in my city/state and none are socialists. Are people parked in the Democratic party while waiting for a "real" party to come along? Or do people actually think they are going to convert the Democratic party into a socialist party?

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
37. I think you might have forgotten the second part
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 07:12 PM
Sep 2014

of a socialist democracy. It seems to work in scandinavian countries quite well. Why not give it a try here, unless you believe the present system is the one that makes us exceptional?

former9thward

(31,973 posts)
39. The Scandinavian countries are capitalist.
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 07:41 PM
Sep 2014

Every single one of them. No, not the type of capitalism as the U.S. but capitalist nevertheless. The posters in the thread by their own words are not capitalist in the least.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
44. In theory........
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 10:15 PM
Sep 2014

although people who trumpet this site as for "Democrats Only" always forget the second part of the purpose statement which is "and other progressives".

I've had an open agenda since I've been posting on DU of converting left leaning Democrats to Marxism because left leaning people, most of whom don't know of any other option to capitalism than the bastardized version of the USSR under Stalinism, are the ones who are closest to already BEING Marxist. And a lot of people, especially on a left leaning site like DU, are already more socialist than capitalist, they either just don't know it or don't want to admit it. I want to give those folks the socialist option to choose if they think it fits their world view.

But I do agree with you that the Democratic Party has always been and always will be a capitalist party. The only time the Dems came close to being a party for workers was when they were needed as a capitalist counterweight for the real workers' parties that sprang up during the last big crisis of capitalism, the Great Depression. They were the ones that gave the workers a few more crumbs from the owners' tables to prevent socialism from becoming established in the USA. Since the fall of the USSR there's no need for that counterweight, so the Dems have dropped support for any policies that help workers rather than the owners and have become what, as you said, they always were, a capitalist party.

Ultimately, class struggle is a zero-sum game. If the owners win, the workers lose and vice versa. During times of crisis, a capitalist party will support the owners in whatever way is needed. At one time when there was a real alternative, the capitalist Dems, threw a little more support to workers. Apparently the newer version of the Democratic Party doesn't think there's a need for that support of workers anymore.

former9thward

(31,973 posts)
48. I enjoy reading your posts since I was a communist in my youth.
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 02:04 AM
Sep 2014

Not the USA CP type of communist but a Maoist. I no longer am. I believe capitalism is the best way of bringing an increased standard of living to the most people. It has problems, such as income inequality, but I think that human nature conflicts with socialism to the point it can't work.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
65. Well, I'm not, nor never have been, a Maoist........
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 08:37 AM
Sep 2014

But I have been a Trotskyist since my youth and I've held on to it. Although that was difficult for a few decades when Keynesian economics seemed to have found a way to defuse the class war. Intellectually I could see that it was only a capitalist tactic in fighting the Cold War, but it was difficult to argue with UNTIL the Reagan/Thatcher Axis of Evil dismantled the Keynesian economic idea and then the fall of the USSR took the brakes off of capitalism entirely. Or almost entirely.

Et voila! Marx was demonstrably correct once again just like he was when he and Engels' first started writing. Which means that every time capitalism is allowed to be itself, it becomes the rapacious animal it actually IS. This is the third time that capitalism has slipped regulatory bounds and become a threat to democracy. I don't want my grandchildren to be constantly fighting fascism like I've had to do. Ergo, we need to try something different like a work's council democracy.

Trotsky, the Marxist road not taken.

TBF

(32,043 posts)
50. In a two-party system we have little choice -
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 09:37 AM
Sep 2014

but events will dictate when that changes. Socialists will be ready when that time comes.

And, frankly, if you hope to save capitalism you'd better get your ass in gear because the income inequality charts are showing a bigger gap than ever between the few "haves" and the many "have nots". ie - there are many more of us than there are of you and when the masses at large realize that it's game over for capitalism.

former9thward

(31,973 posts)
56. In your post you have slogans that have been around for more than 100 years.
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 10:31 AM
Sep 2014

No, there are many more of us than there are of you, is just plain false in this country. Socialists are the tiniest of minorities in this country. But good luck, you may get what you want in 100, 200 or 300 years.

TBF

(32,043 posts)
60. It's not going to take 100 years with this growth rate -
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 10:57 AM
Sep 2014

how much more do you think folks can take? The gini coefficient continues to show growing inequality when comparing countries. There we are down there with Mexico:





sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
36. Perhaps we could start to teach
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 07:07 PM
Sep 2014

children and adults that greed is bad and leading to disasters. The ME,ME society has to be replaced by a WE society, since in the end we are all in this mess together, and what we do to others should be done to us as well.

The realization of the desperate need for communal thinking has to come before any action could be started even.

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
38. Civilization is the resource extraction and concentration mechanism
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 07:38 PM
Sep 2014

Think of civilization as a corporation, and the planet as the government. Think what human beings can't actually do physically. All of the progress we've made over the centuries is like finding loopholes in government regulation. We don't like limits. Human flight. Humans traveling at 50mph. Name the advance, and it's no different than what Monsanto, Wal-Mart, or Exxon do in relation to the government. Humans now try to write the environmental rules that govern us.

Civilization is what is unchecked. It is why we're at where we're at.

LuvNewcastle

(16,844 posts)
41. I think civilization will ultimately destroy capitalism.
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 09:06 PM
Sep 2014

I believe socialism, or hybrid systems, are the wave of the future. Unfortunately, it also seems that fascism and totalitarianism are also on the rise, remarkably so in this country. We have to do all we can to stop that. I don't think it's possible to have socialism without a large degree of government oversight, but the tactics of our intelligence agencies, the DEA, and the police are way beyond what is required to provide proper oversight. We have to stop it for our descendants as well as for ourselves.

bhikkhu

(10,715 posts)
46. Government is the check on capitalism
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 11:36 PM
Sep 2014

Capitalism, by nature, funnels all the wealth into the top tier and keeps it there. Government, through taxation, regulation, social programs and so forth, maintains whatever standard of equity people demand.

Most of the arguments against capitalism are really arguments for more effective and responsive government.

DemocraticWing

(1,290 posts)
47. Unregulated capitalism, crony capitalism, laissez-faire capitalism, unchecked capitalism, etc.
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 11:48 PM
Sep 2014

Those are the things ruining the world. What do they all have in common?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
52. For anything to be done about climate change, the wealthy elite must give up
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 10:17 AM
Sep 2014

some of their "hard earned" wealth. Hell and/or the earth will freeze over first. It appears to me that the quest for power is stronger in our human nature than being altruistic. Possibly, after millions die, the wealthy elite might agree to do something. Most likely they will wait too long and the goose that laid the golden egg will be already dead.

Possibly the robot/computer singularity will have occurred and they will continue on in our stead.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
57. It's not really altruism vs. greed though, is it?
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 10:36 AM
Sep 2014

Wealthy elites won't have much to lord power over, or even a non-toxic lake to jet-ski in, should the environment go toes up for the humans.

The trick is to get enough of them to swap end-of-your-nose self-interest for the more enlightened kind, where you notice all of the other boats floating up and down together.

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
64. IMO, it will take a
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:02 PM
Sep 2014

a combination of well regulated economic systems to stop the destruction of our world and create a planet that is worth passing on to future generations. Obviously "unfettered (and bastardized) capitalism is unsustainable.
Possibly well regulated capitalism with socialism (not for the corporations and elite as now practiced) could be an option.
FDR's "2nd Bill of Rights" must be a large part. It would codify peoples basic needs..ie..health care for all, a guaranteed living wage, guaranteed living standards or the disabled, retired, elderly, etc..
IMO, using this as a building block, we can guarantee some basic economic fairness.
As for our planet, it is clear that we must immediately turn to renewable resources. Just by doing that, we can employ most people (in the short run) retooling our current, unsustainable model. This will lead to many innovations just like the "space race" did.
Of course, returning to pre-Reagan taxation of the wealthy is a no-brainer.
Bernie Sanders would be an excellent choice to usher in and guarantee that the least among us become a relic of a past era.
Saving our planet is the perfect time to save our country and transform America into a country of equals.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Naomi Klein is right: Unc...