General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)They need to enter the 21st century in regards to how they treat women.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...and any other believers, agnostics and atheist.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)riqster
(13,986 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesnt always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one youre already in.[/center][/font][hr]
Brainstormy
(2,380 posts)riqster
(13,986 posts)The message is the important bit.
calimary
(81,125 posts)It's possible to see the logic behind both options.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Lex
(34,108 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Either is grammatically correct given the ambiguity of past tense versus passive present tense.
Cool thing to focus on though...
whopis01
(3,491 posts)It may appear to be crossing tenses at first glance, but it actually is not.
The phrase "If you do stupid things" is clearly in the present tense. The phrase "it is because you chose to do stupid things" is clearly in the past tense.
However, the verbs are not referring to the same action. The two phrases are describing a cause and effect situation. The cause must happen prior to the effect.
The present situation ("you do stupid things" has been caused by a past decision ("you chose" .
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)The sheer volume of the hair spray need to keep poofy bouffant hairdos like those from air braiding into what would look like rabid chinchillas attacking the backs of their heads.
Throwing your knife into a table top is a questionable method of intimidation, but an excellent way to disarm yourself and make an enemy at the same time.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,362 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Simply walk down the aisle waving a tampon like a baton, and watch them scatter. They won't ask for so much as a glass of water, either!
I have a friend who is a flight attendant who used that trick all the time when she was working the Tel Aviv flight.
If these nitwits can't book their flights in a bloc of seats to avoid those "terrible" women, then tough shit. The airlines should tell them if they don't take their seats they'll be removed and their luggage taken off as well, and they won't get a refund.
Enough, already.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,362 posts)I'll repeat what I said on a FB post about the incident I linked above;
derby378
(30,252 posts)riqster
(13,986 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)that men can't help themselves around women, they won't allow "courting" couples to be alone together ever. Also the reason for the "modest" clothing - scared to death of "defrauding" some poor guy who might get a hard on at the sight of female knees. Seriously fucked up view of the world.
Gothmog
(144,933 posts)calimary
(81,125 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,967 posts)And jumping on the Islamic world to ignore the problems in ours isn't being part of the solution
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,967 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)My first reaction was a blanket to cover her and a 911 call.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Because women are supposed to be virtuous and not lustful and powerless.
Like people who say women never beat up men.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)The stuff that woman makes me do can fill Lists I tell you!
jimlup
(7,968 posts)This is exactly what I want him, as a man, to understand.