General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMitt Romney's Latest Excuse for His 47 Percent Remarks Is a Doozy
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/09/mitt-romney-latest-excuse-47-percent-remarksMitt Romney's Latest Excuse for His 47 Percent Remarks Is a Doozy
You won't believe who he's blaming now.
By David Corn
| Tue Sep. 30, 2014 12:15 PM EDT
snip//
Now Romney has gone further in denying responsibility for the remark, blaming the 47 percent fiasco on the fellow who tossed him the question. Here's the relevant excerpt from Leibovich's piece:
"My mistake was that I was speaking in a way that reflected back to the man," Romney said. "If I had been able to see the camera, I would have remembered that I was talking to the whole world, not just the man." I had never heard Romney say that he was prompted into the "47 percent" line by a ranting supporter.
Leibovich is right; this seems to be the first time Romney has tried to place responsibility for his comment on the person who asked him the question. That supporter was not rambling. Here's what he asked: "For the last three years, all everybody's been told is, 'Don't worry, we'll take care of you.' How are you going to do it, in two months before the elections, to convince everybody you've got to take care of yourself?" That was a straightforward query, succinctly put, not rambling at all. It was Romney who took the point to the next level and proclaimed that a specific number of Americans were lazy freeloaders who could not and would not fend for themselves.
To recap: Romney has gone from side-stepping the remark, to owning the thrust of this comment (though noting it was not well articulated), to saying he was wrong, to denying he said what he said (and contending his words were distorted), to claiming he was only mirroring the rambling remarks of a big-money backer. This last explanation is certainly not fair to the 1-percenter who merely expressed his very 1-percentish opinion. Does this mean that Romney was thrown off his game by a simple questionor that he was trying to suck up to a donor?
In the two years since Romney was caught on tape, he just cannot come up with a clear explanation of an easy-to-understand short series of sentences that were responsive to the question presented. But there is one possible explanation he hasn't yet put forward: He said what he believed.
gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)fucking pig!
madokie
(51,076 posts)rMoney is a fucking pig and nothing more or nothing less. A fucking pig of a swine
gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)as succinct as can be.
gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)I can't stand that conceited, smug fucker.
calimary
(81,179 posts)Nailed it, gopiscrap. THAT is the bottom line for "Super-Wealthy, Imperious, Smug, Entitled, Arrogant, Lord Bottom-Line".
onethatcares
(16,165 posts)he thinks that is the only reason he lost.
what a dipshit.
Lochloosa
(16,061 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Blame it on Rafalca!
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)erpowers
(9,350 posts)This, in my opinion, is a show of a lack of personal responsibility from the man who bashes the 47% for a lack of personal responsibility. Mitt Romney refuses to take personal responsibility for his statement.
babylonsister
(171,042 posts)are of course right, but I think the man isn't too bright despite whatever successes he's had. He also doesn't seem to have a moral core. He's listening to his handlers; doesn't he have any input, or is it whatever furthers the cause of Mitt?
Give me a man of conviction any day; he has none.
Dustlawyer
(10,494 posts)even though it was wrong, ugly, and an outrageously stupid thing to say!
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Yea much better!!!!
Cha
(297,029 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)You know what they say . . . the 6th time is the charm!!!
I think this is the 6th excuse poor ol' Mitt has given for saying what he believed outloud.
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)shut your pie hole.
C Moon
(12,212 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)that a person can be wealthy and still be a fucking LOSER!
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)That should be included in the urban dictionary...
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=nitwit
kairos12
(12,849 posts)of verbal vehicles designed to place blame on the great unwashed.
delete_bush
(1,712 posts)on his car elevator for the verbal vehicles?
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)oh that's right, that would be too much to ask
babylonsister
(171,042 posts)It appears he doesn't have any.
He's taken lessons from McCain. If they had any moral convictions, they were compromised. Not they just look like tired old men to me.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)or order his help to do it, more likely
malaise
(268,844 posts)1%er - what a dumbass
JHB
(37,157 posts)Then there's the aspect where Quality is not exactly Job 1:
But dodging uncomfortable questions is par for horse disco:
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)(love the cookies bit btw)
hibbing
(10,095 posts)Take your hair and get one of your cars out of your car elevator and just go away, oh yeah, and don't forget to bring your binders of women and do that spray tan thing on your face...hehe
Peace
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)trusty elf
(7,382 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
calimary
(81,179 posts)Get her outta MY field of vision, for sure!
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)Too long in the wasteland, too long in the wasteland, must have gone to Mitt's head.
Well, I hadn't intended
to bend the rules
but whiskey don't make liars
it just makes fools
so I didn't mean to say it
but I meant what I said.
Apologies to James McMurtry:
Wash. state Desk Jet
(3,426 posts)If you go back to where Ted Kennedy summed up Romney than further wrote into how to beat Romney ,one quote from the senator pretty much nailed it. Kennedy wrote into Romney's short comings one of which is "Romney will say anything to get elected.Of course that means he is a lier and a habitual.Now than a habitual lier cannot remember the long long trail of lies ,it is not as if they write all those lies down in a little black book of lies so that they don't trip themselves up somewhere down the line, no,what they do is tell lies over the top of lies and create more lies to cover for lies they cannot defend.
What it comes down to is Ted Kennedy knew Romney's short comings,he knew Romney will say anything to get what he wants. He wanted the presidency.
The trick to beating Romney is simple, you pick and choose carefully what lies you call him out on ,where and when. In other words, the hard part about it in a campaign situation is sitting in the massive lake of lies with Romney ,waiting for just the bite,like fishing.
The guy that got caught that one wasn't even there looking for the great catch! He just happened to catch it ,the rest is history.
Didn't Jimmy Carter's grandson have a hand in that one too ? ! Getting it to go viral I mean.
Do you really think a habitual lier can confess to having been caught in a sea of lies?
OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)Remember -- it's only us 47% who are responsible for our words and actions. If you're in the 1%, it's ALWAYS someone else's fault.
Next thing we know, Mitt will claim it was the gardener who tied his dog to the car roof.
bhikkhu
(10,714 posts)then backtracks and revises or denies it when there is a different audience is in front of him, and offended. Its a characteristic of weak character, lack of self-knowledge, lack of convictions.
lob1
(3,820 posts)everyone. Remember when he was talking about visiting a Chinese manufacturer? Those workers were basically slave labor living in slave labor conditions and he thought that was a great business model. Mr. Hair is the lowest kind of scumbag on many, many levels.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)of course Mitt would be the one to complain that slaves don't pay taxes.
Aristus
(66,307 posts)...stop talking!...
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)I definitely would. At this point, he just looks like a bigheaded jackass.
spanone
(135,802 posts)tea and oranges
(396 posts)Or thinking seriously about running. Why else would he bother to explain himself to the great unwashed unless they have something he wants - their votes.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)It makes me wonder what he's up to. I know he's said he won't, but you never know.
Javaman
(62,507 posts)rtracey
(2,062 posts)Stop giving this guy air space.....let him ramble, but why do the democrats need to even bother with him, I say just stop giving him airtime. It's not news, it's not earthshaking. He is not bi-partisan. He is only going to bad mouth the president. He wouldn't have let ISIS get this far. He wouldn't have allowed Russia to invade Ukraine......BS BS BS BS.....so lets total STOP...
CTyankee
(63,899 posts)I guess we let him ramble on and make a damn fool out of himself AGAIN and then just win the election...what a maroon...
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)and have one of your lackeys/minions explain it to you. Hint - stop digging.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)There are actually two possible explanations and neither of them really "favor" Romney.
1) He said what he believed in an uncharacteristically clear way. It's been said that the modern definition of a political "gaff" is to get caught accidentally saying what you really believe.
2) He was "saying anything" to get elected. Many on the conservative side always believe that about him and it dogged him through the primaries.
Cha
(297,029 posts)witt.. now he's telling himself he was brought down by a supporter.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Oh, boo-hoo-hoo-hooo.
I'm so sad now.
That guy didn't need to ask me any questions!
Oh, boo-hoo-hoo.
I wish I was never asked any questions!
Boo-hoo-hoo!
I had it, in the palm of my hand!
Boo-hoo-hoo!
I wonder if President Obama will invite me to come to the White House and sit in the chair behind his desk in the Oval Office now.
Boo-hoo-hoo!
We had even picked out new curtains for the Oval Office!
Boo-hoo-hoo!
Boo-hoo-hoo!
Cha
(297,029 posts)SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)and always will be, an incompetent idiot. Thank God he and his moronic sidekick didn't get the job.
neeksgeek
(1,214 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)czarjak
(11,260 posts)There's lemmings that would do it all over again. The same ones that miss W.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)He meant exactly what he said. Low-income Americans are lazy, shiftless, grifters.
TeamPooka
(24,216 posts)JHB
(37,157 posts)So far he's averaging a new one every 10 months. Maybe fewer months, depending on how you count variants of the excuses.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Mitt's face is a perfectly smooth surface that's like a plastic without a single pore or visible hair follicle.
As if he had them removed.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)He is in another world.