Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 02:31 PM Oct 2014

As Ebola Spreads, U.S. Still Without a Surgeon General, per GOP/NRA Obstruction.



http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/the-nra-making-the-ebola-crisis-worse


How the NRA is making the Ebola crisis worse


Every day brings more details about the first case of the Ebola virus to be diagnosed in the U.S. And while experts say there is essentially no risk of a significant outbreak here in the states, much of the public remains worried. A poll by Harvard found that 39% of U.S. adults are concerned about a large outbreak here, and more than a quarter fear someone in their immediate family could get sick with Ebola.

If only there was someone around who could educate the American public about the actual level of risk. Someone who was trusted as a public health expert and whose job it was to help us understand what we really need to worry about and what precautions we should take.

Actually, that is one of the primary responsibilities of the United States surgeon general. There’s just one problem: Thanks to Senate dysfunction and NRA opposition, we don’t have a surgeon general right now. In fact, we haven’t had a surgeon general for more than a year now — even though the president nominated the eminently qualified Dr. Vivek Murthy back in November 2013.
The lack of a surgeon general is now becoming more than just one more abstract example of government gridlock.

(snip)

So thanks to NRA power and Senate cowardice, we are left with no surgeon general during a time when, we not only have Ebola arriving on our shores, but are also dealing with the mysterious Enterovirus, which is infecting and contributing to the deaths of children in the U.S.

“We need all hands on deck, and a surgeon general to echo and amplify the messages coming from the CDC, and to provide evidence-based advocacy to shape our response,” said Dr. Paul Farmer, chief of the Division of Global Health Equity at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.

In other words, now would be a great time to have someone in the role of top doctor.

81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As Ebola Spreads, U.S. Still Without a Surgeon General, per GOP/NRA Obstruction. (Original Post) nashville_brook Oct 2014 OP
Wow - I had totally forgotten about that. Vinca Oct 2014 #1
me too! just saw this and was amazed no one has been talking about it. nashville_brook Oct 2014 #5
Me three Politicub Oct 2014 #26
this would be a sparkling opportunity to differentiate during fall campaigns. nashville_brook Oct 2014 #75
The office is not vacant. There is an acting Surgeon General. See the link below: MineralMan Oct 2014 #2
per the article: nashville_brook Oct 2014 #6
There is an acting Surgeon General, as I said. MineralMan Oct 2014 #8
wow -- you don't think we could use a REAL surgeon general, one who's not nashville_brook Oct 2014 #9
When did I say that? Yes, of course we need a permanent MineralMan Oct 2014 #10
right, the SG works with the public…on issues of PR to mitigate panic, rumors and bad info nashville_brook Oct 2014 #16
Yes, there is a difference b/w calling a press conference as The Surgeon General of The United Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #30
The Acting Surgeon General, Rear Admiral Lushniak, amandabeech Oct 2014 #34
yeah well, he's not doing the job. nashville_brook Oct 2014 #64
When are the people going to demand that the Congress do its freaking job Skidmore Oct 2014 #11
seriously -- this isn't an Obama thing. nashville_brook Oct 2014 #13
No, it isn't. Skidmore Oct 2014 #19
then you don't even want to look at twitter #ebola nashville_brook Oct 2014 #25
Sorry, that's not what they've been trained to do. Crash2Parties Oct 2014 #31
No, they've been trained to Skidmore Oct 2014 #32
Far too many "liberals" at DU have a real soft spot for the NRA, enemy of liberalism everywhere. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #40
+1 uponit7771 Oct 2014 #46
+1 more calimary Oct 2014 #60
+1 again nashville_brook Oct 2014 #67
And the whores in the Senate are doing their best not to confirm a real one... Orsino Oct 2014 #56
That's correct, which is why we need to: MineralMan Oct 2014 #57
GOTV for whom? Who is holding up the SG confirmation? Sopkoviak Oct 2014 #61
have to agree here -- Reid seems to be protected his Blue Dogs nashville_brook Oct 2014 #66
re: If only there was someone ... could educate the American public about the actual level of risk" hlthe2b Oct 2014 #3
We suck if we can't take care of business between surgeons general. NYC_SKP Oct 2014 #4
I thought similar. ...actually i thought, pipoman Oct 2014 #15
Not having a SG is part of the whole shutting down government agenda the Republicans push KittyWampus Oct 2014 #18
+10000000 nashville_brook Oct 2014 #71
The last time we faced a new viral threat, the Surgeon General was the person who finally forced Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #52
really good point! nashville_brook Oct 2014 #63
CDC Ebola Update Website Page MineralMan Oct 2014 #7
If the NRA was responsible for everything attributed to it pipoman Oct 2014 #12
Except they were in fact, the catalyst for directly preventing the CDC from researching gun violence LanternWaste Oct 2014 #17
Every time you post I envision a mynah bird... pipoman Oct 2014 #23
It simply goes towards your allegation that the NRA is a bogey-man. LanternWaste Oct 2014 #24
Strawman fallacies are the NRA's main allies. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #39
The NRA apologists on DU will parrot the NRA propaganda, they are as hopeless as on Fox. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #37
You are correct, and much more could be said. For example the NRA is directly responsible for no Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #51
"...(T)he NRA is to blame for the Ebola outbreak in America, I say." friendly_iconoclast Oct 2014 #79
I actually see the connection, you do not, so be it. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #81
+1000000 nashville_brook Oct 2014 #73
They ARE far more effective legislators than either party. Orsino Oct 2014 #58
+1 nashville_brook Oct 2014 #68
I'm sick of Harry Reid. A majority means nothing to him. KeepItReal Oct 2014 #14
And here I thought it was just me feeling like you! SoapBox Oct 2014 #28
That's the root of the problem IMHO, they (dems in DC) think the cons in congress give a damn uponit7771 Oct 2014 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author TheVisitor Oct 2014 #20
Reid is responsible for this. former9thward Oct 2014 #21
Reid is totally incompetent world wide wally Oct 2014 #36
i want to think it's incompetence, but i'm afraid he's been rewarded for nashville_brook Oct 2014 #43
The NRA and a few Democratic Senators are to blame....that is a fact...Reid is a gem. Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #50
No, it is not a fact. Bring it to a vote. former9thward Oct 2014 #54
KNR! DirkGently Oct 2014 #22
Repugs, the party of death. lark Oct 2014 #27
of course not BlindTiresias Oct 2014 #33
mentioned this upthread, but twitter is polluted with conservamorons nashville_brook Oct 2014 #42
"A poll by Harvard found that 39% of U.S. adults are concerned about a large outbreak here." blkmusclmachine Oct 2014 #29
They're probably more concerned about the zombies than ISIS. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #38
literally seeing *ebola zombies* stories nashville_brook Oct 2014 #41
Figures.... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #44
I think this is not all that rare in places without alot of medical professionals Marrah_G Oct 2014 #62
good point. there might also be something about this virus nashville_brook Oct 2014 #69
Agree! Marrah_G Oct 2014 #76
I am more personally concerned about Ebola than ISIS bigwillq Oct 2014 #45
and even if it doesn't literally touch anyone we know, nashville_brook Oct 2014 #74
So, i guess they will really push to repeal Obamacare now! world wide wally Oct 2014 #35
actually this is a great time to pressure remaining red states to expand medicaid NOW nashville_brook Oct 2014 #70
The Surgeon General is the person who could have sounded the alarm months ago SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2014 #48
I don't know which statement 1dogleft Oct 2014 #49
read the article -- the Surgeon General's job is to help citizens on a large scale nashville_brook Oct 2014 #72
The SG had the nerve to say that guns can harm people's health when they are on the wrong end of one world wide wally Oct 2014 #78
8 years of school 1dogleft Oct 2014 #80
morning kicked nashville_brook Oct 2014 #53
It would be a great time to have someone in the role of top doc. Octafish Oct 2014 #55
It's too bad he supported something as stupid as the Assault Weapons Ban. aikoaiko Oct 2014 #59
you forgot the sarcasm thingy, b/c for the top doc to oppose assault weapons nashville_brook Oct 2014 #65
Did you know that the AR15 used at Sandy Hook was Assault Weapon Ban compliant ? aikoaiko Oct 2014 #77

Vinca

(50,261 posts)
1. Wow - I had totally forgotten about that.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 02:32 PM
Oct 2014

The fools should come back to Washington and take a vote on someone.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
6. per the article:
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 02:46 PM
Oct 2014



At the moment, Tom Frieden, the head of the Center for Disease Control, has been filling in for part of the surgeon general’s role, but he has his own vital work to attend to as both head of the CDC and the U.S. Ambassador to the World Health Organization.

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
8. There is an acting Surgeon General, as I said.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 02:47 PM
Oct 2014

There is someone who is qualified in charge of that office already.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
9. wow -- you don't think we could use a REAL surgeon general, one who's not
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 02:55 PM
Oct 2014

involved in the day-to-day with CDC and WHO at this moment? you don't think the Republicans should get back to DC and do the work they should have already done?

or, do you stand with the NRA on this one?

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
10. When did I say that? Yes, of course we need a permanent
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 02:58 PM
Oct 2014

appointment to that office and Congress needs to get off the stick and confirm one. The acting Surgeon General was formerly the Deputy Surgeon General, though, and so is probably qualified for the job.

The Surgeon General, though, doesn't deal with emergent health problems like Ebola. That's the CDC's job.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
16. right, the SG works with the public…on issues of PR to mitigate panic, rumors and bad info
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:04 PM
Oct 2014

which is a huge issue right now.

i'd much rather someone high placed with his CV stay involved on the infectious disease side -- but we need someone filling the Surgeon General position to get out in front of the messaging.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
30. Yes, there is a difference b/w calling a press conference as The Surgeon General of The United
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 04:30 PM
Oct 2014

of America, instead of the guy who is just filling in.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
34. The Acting Surgeon General, Rear Admiral Lushniak,
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 07:14 PM
Oct 2014

appears to have outstanding credentials.

I don't care if he's acting or not, if he can do the job, let him.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
11. When are the people going to demand that the Congress do its freaking job
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 02:58 PM
Oct 2014

instead of blaming every fricking thing under the sun on the President? It is Congresses job to legislate and to approve appointments, not to be on perpetual vacation.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
19. No, it isn't.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:08 PM
Oct 2014

We have a government barely limping along because of this bunch of corrupt Republican/Teabagger legislators who have been actively breaking it for years now. It just makes me so angry.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
25. then you don't even want to look at twitter #ebola
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:27 PM
Oct 2014

this is why the surgeon general thing resonated with me.

the mountain of bullshit that being peddled out there RE ebola and enterovirus is vile racism. "shut the borders down b/c people from other (brown) countries carry diseases." it's revolting.

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
31. Sorry, that's not what they've been trained to do.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 05:45 PM
Oct 2014

1. Identify a strong authority figure.
2. Do what it says, say what it says.
3. Power, by association.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
32. No, they've been trained to
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 06:17 PM
Oct 2014

try to live like the people on reality teevee because Kardashians and fake Housewives or actors and their families are truly aspirational. You cannot think when you are busy shopping.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
56. And the whores in the Senate are doing their best not to confirm a real one...
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 11:35 AM
Oct 2014

...while of course ensuring that the acting SG can't do a damned thing, either. Corporate power must not be eclipsed by even the appearance of governmental authority.

 

Sopkoviak

(357 posts)
61. GOTV for whom? Who is holding up the SG confirmation?
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 01:54 PM
Oct 2014

the 55-seat Democratic caucus can confirm nominees with no Republican buy-in.

The chickenshit majority could confirm Vivek Murthy tomorrow.

But being in the majority has complicated life for the Democrats.

They can no longer expect a Republican filibuster to kill a “controversial” nomination.

They have to kill the nominations themselves.

Bunch of fucking cowards.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
66. have to agree here -- Reid seems to be protected his Blue Dogs
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 02:12 PM
Oct 2014

and that's just irresponsible under these circumstances.

hlthe2b

(102,225 posts)
3. re: If only there was someone ... could educate the American public about the actual level of risk"
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 02:37 PM
Oct 2014

While I think it would help to have someone in the Surgeon General role, I can assure you they too, (unless they had come from a very strong public health virological epidemiological background) would be deferring to the Directors of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Director Dr. Tom Frieden ) and National Institutes of Health Allergy & Infectious Disease (NIH-NAID Director, Dr. Anthony Fauci).

This is where the expertise lies.

Dr. Frieden is the person in charge of the public health efforts at the Federal level, but what most don't recognize is that neither CDC (nor at the global level, the World Health Organization, WHO) can take all control from the local, state, (and in the case of WHO, the country level). Everything is cooperative. It isn't like in law enforcement, where the Feds can more or less completely take over decisional authority from the locals. That's why you'll see the "hosting" locals and state authorities being given deferential treatment frequently. That does NOT mean that they are "running the show" behind the sidelines, but rather they are given public deference. THose with the expertise know they can't function without cooperation, so even if you have a very stupid governor running off at the mouth or locals running to every microphone, they have to address this kind of thing behind the scenes. Not specific to Ebola, but every major disease outbreak in which CDC (and WHO) become involved.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
4. We suck if we can't take care of business between surgeons general.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 02:42 PM
Oct 2014

Let's face it-- obstructionism is a way of life, this isn't new.

If the CDC and other bodies can't function at 100% without a nominal surgeon general, then they probably can't function with one.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
15. I thought similar. ...actually i thought,
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:03 PM
Oct 2014

'ffs, how pathetic, we need someone who can dumb down health information? What do we have the media for?'


edit...silly me, we need the media to strike fear in those who can't understand all that medical mumbo-jumbo and we need a surgeon general to unscare the cowering masses...

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
18. Not having a SG is part of the whole shutting down government agenda the Republicans push
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:07 PM
Oct 2014

What part of the simple fact don't you grasp?

You see "NRA" and feel the need to defend the indefensible? Is that it?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
52. The last time we faced a new viral threat, the Surgeon General was the person who finally forced
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 09:24 AM
Oct 2014

the bigoted, ignorant hand of Ronald Wilson Reagan to take a bit of action, to swallow his stupidity and hate and speak out loud about the greatest health crisis of our time. By the time Koop motivated Reagan to initiate some action we had more than 20,000 American dead, 50,000 more infected.
C Everette Koop was the last Republican I ever saw do anything of value for this country and the world. Had he not been in office, who knows how much worse things would have gotten....
Last year in Africa, 1.2 million deaths from AIDS in Africa.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
12. If the NRA was responsible for everything attributed to it
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:00 PM
Oct 2014

The NRA would be more effective legislators than either party. No, they're given far more credit than they deserve for the sake of fulfilling some people's need for a boogeyman. ...and/or to make excuses for the purchased legislators they love to reelect. ..

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
17. Except they were in fact, the catalyst for directly preventing the CDC from researching gun violence
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:07 PM
Oct 2014

Except the NRA was in fact, the primary catalyst for directly preventing the CDC from researching gun violence (the Dickey Amendment).

(insert distinction without a difference here)

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
23. Every time you post I envision a mynah bird...
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:15 PM
Oct 2014

Every time you post I envision a mynah bird....

that said, the cdc publishes mountains of statistics on gun violence along with every other form of violence every year. And what does this have to do with appointing a surgeon general?

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
24. It simply goes towards your allegation that the NRA is a bogey-man.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:25 PM
Oct 2014

"And what does this have to do with appointing a surgeon general?"
It simply goes towards your allegation that the NRA is a mere bogey-man.

Every time I post you imagine things, huh? That's kind of... special/creepy.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
51. You are correct, and much more could be said. For example the NRA is directly responsible for no
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 08:38 AM
Oct 2014

Surgeon General as enough Democratic Senators have been cowed by the gun and fun crowd to make it impossible...a Surgeon General, free from constraints of politics, could have sounded the alarm on Ebola months ago....so the NRA is to blame for the Ebola outbreak in America, I say. Sure as fuck did not help.

An acting anything is NEVER as effective.....for many reasons, think about it...do I have to do all the work for you?

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
79. "...(T)he NRA is to blame for the Ebola outbreak in America, I say."
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 04:38 PM
Oct 2014

NRA Derangement Syndrome, anyone?

P.S.- that statement has made DU's version of the Gun Control Advocacy Hall of Fame:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/11729858

http://www.democraticunderground.com/11729858#post279

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
58. They ARE far more effective legislators than either party.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 11:47 AM
Oct 2014

God damn it, if either party had their success rate at halting or passing legislation, they would be running on it this year.

But they don't, so they aren't.

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
14. I'm sick of Harry Reid. A majority means nothing to him.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:03 PM
Oct 2014

As if the GOP minority would give 2 sh!ts about "respecting the rights of the minority" if the tables were turned.

Reid needs to stop this GOP mayhem of filibustering and silent holds on President Obama's nominations to all of these positions.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
47. That's the root of the problem IMHO, they (dems in DC) think the cons in congress give a damn
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 02:03 AM
Oct 2014

... about the country to the level the dems do...

They don't

they've shown this many many many times

Response to nashville_brook (Original post)

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
21. Reid is responsible for this.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:14 PM
Oct 2014

He will not bring it to a vote. And NO, the filibuster has nothing to do with it. That rule was changed for Presidential nominees. There is no filibuster to blame.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
43. i want to think it's incompetence, but i'm afraid he's been rewarded for
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 10:18 PM
Oct 2014

using the strategy and tactics that are keeping us from moving forward. in addition to bringing up these confirmation votes (and possibly embarrassing conservadems) he's also refusing to support progressive-ish Senate dem candidates that actually have a chance of winning if they'd just get a little help from DC.

the one that comes to mind is Weiland in South Dakota, but there's another one I ran across yesterday.


http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/219278-reid-daschle-feud-erupts

lark

(23,091 posts)
27. Repugs, the party of death.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 03:55 PM
Oct 2014

They don't want healthcare for anyone but the 1% and don't want anyone to actually promote health care. They just want the NRA $$ for themselves and don't give a shit how many children kill themselves or friends or family by playing with loaded guns. They refuse to have the studies done because the results would show that guns rarely protect people in their homes. It would totally take away many of the NRA lies, so of course, congress can't have that. Who cares how many die of Ebola? Bet that they are going to start using this against Obama too and of course will never take responsibility for the mayhem they themselves created.


nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
42. mentioned this upthread, but twitter is polluted with conservamorons
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 10:15 PM
Oct 2014

blaming obama for ebola. and it's as racist as you would imagine b/c it's all "close the borders" b/c people from non-anglo countries "carry diseases."

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
29. "A poll by Harvard found that 39% of U.S. adults are concerned about a large outbreak here."
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 04:22 PM
Oct 2014

So, Americans are more worried about ISIS than Ebola???

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
41. literally seeing *ebola zombies* stories
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 10:12 PM
Oct 2014
http://allafrica.com/stories/201409240829.html

this is an early one, but f'n NBC ran a story today. seems people crash and appear dead, and then revive when moved.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
62. I think this is not all that rare in places without alot of medical professionals
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 02:04 PM
Oct 2014

I wonder who it was that pronounced these people dead. I remember reading about people here in America in the 17th/18th century that would wake up at their funeral/wake or burial because they had appeared dead but weren't.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
69. good point. there might also be something about this virus
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 02:16 PM
Oct 2014

that creates a period of super-low life signs in the late stages, as this has been reported a number of times.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
76. Agree!
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 02:36 PM
Oct 2014

I know its not the same thing, but when my elderly cat was dying, at one point I actually thought he had passed. I called my kids to tell them and prepared him to be buried.... then at the last minute I saw him breathe. He lasted a whole day longer, but unconscious. It was a roller coaster couple of days.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
45. I am more personally concerned about Ebola than ISIS
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 12:43 AM
Oct 2014

The chances of getting Ebola are very, very low for me, I believe. But I also believe Ebola is more of a threat, personally, than ISIS is.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
74. and even if it doesn't literally touch anyone we know,
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 02:24 PM
Oct 2014

it's affect on our life here in the US has the potential to be far more destructive.

(as does poverty, crappy wages and lack of sick time -- but that's the subject for another post)

 

1dogleft

(164 posts)
49. I don't know which statement
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 07:29 AM
Oct 2014

is more ludicrous. That it won't spread or having an SG would make a difference. What the hell does the NRA have to do with anything

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
72. read the article -- the Surgeon General's job is to help citizens on a large scale
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 02:20 PM
Oct 2014

to understand complex health issues.

and the NRA has objected to the nominee for the position so the GOP put a hold on it.


read, my friend. it will answer all your questions.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
55. It would be a great time to have someone in the role of top doc.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 11:01 AM
Oct 2014

Thanks to the Turtle, we don't though.

Great post, nashville_Brooksan!

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
59. It's too bad he supported something as stupid as the Assault Weapons Ban.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 11:53 AM
Oct 2014

Last edited Sat Oct 4, 2014, 12:49 PM - Edit history (1)

If you have political ambitions you shouldn't say stupid things.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
65. you forgot the sarcasm thingy, b/c for the top doc to oppose assault weapons
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 02:10 PM
Oct 2014

seems pretty damn sane to me.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
77. Did you know that the AR15 used at Sandy Hook was Assault Weapon Ban compliant ?
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 02:40 PM
Oct 2014


That's how useless and stupid such bans are.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As Ebola Spreads, U.S. St...