Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe only kind of sex conservatives can rally to defend: non-consensual( ie: rape)
What rape has in common with abortion bans: "In the end, its all about making women suffer for daring to think they own their own bodies." (https://www.facebook.com/Mediamatters/posts/10152425280596167)
___
George Will has suddenly become the champion of sexual liberty, it appears. He was on Fox News Sunday, denouncing big government for its interference in peoples sex lives.
Monitoring sex? Is Will standing up against the various attacks on consensual sex that are going on around the country? Is he mad because Students For Life at the University of New Mexico attempted to shut down Sex Week because they disapprove ofand are trying to monitorother students sex lives? Is it Alabama is so invested in monitoring the sex lives of teenagers that they passed a law basically requiring teenage girls to be put on trial should they wish to have abortion? Is he mad about the 5th Circuit Court allowing an abortion law in Texas that clearly only exists to punish women who chose consensual sex?
Nah, of course not. Hes pissed about Californias new law requiring campuses to define consent as, well, consent. I explained it here, should you want to read in more detail, but the TL;DR version is this: The only people who will be negatively affected by the law are men who want to get away with forcing sex on unwilling women, i.e. rapists. For men who do not enjoy raping, only having sex with the willing is not only not difficult, but standard operating procedure.
So thats where conservatism stands, circa 2014: Consensual sex is evil, but a mans right to force non-consensual sex on a woman is sacrosanct, no matter how much damage it causes. After all, it mostly just hurts women, right, and they arent really people at all.
You asked, can we trust the government to do its job? What isnt its job nowadays? I just made a list of it. Its fine-tuning the curriculum of our students K through 12. Its monitoring sex on campuses. Its deciding how much ethanol we should put in our gas tanks. It has designed our light bulbs and its worried sick over the name of the Washington football team.
Monitoring sex? Is Will standing up against the various attacks on consensual sex that are going on around the country? Is he mad because Students For Life at the University of New Mexico attempted to shut down Sex Week because they disapprove ofand are trying to monitorother students sex lives? Is it Alabama is so invested in monitoring the sex lives of teenagers that they passed a law basically requiring teenage girls to be put on trial should they wish to have abortion? Is he mad about the 5th Circuit Court allowing an abortion law in Texas that clearly only exists to punish women who chose consensual sex?
Nah, of course not. Hes pissed about Californias new law requiring campuses to define consent as, well, consent. I explained it here, should you want to read in more detail, but the TL;DR version is this: The only people who will be negatively affected by the law are men who want to get away with forcing sex on unwilling women, i.e. rapists. For men who do not enjoy raping, only having sex with the willing is not only not difficult, but standard operating procedure.
So thats where conservatism stands, circa 2014: Consensual sex is evil, but a mans right to force non-consensual sex on a woman is sacrosanct, no matter how much damage it causes. After all, it mostly just hurts women, right, and they arent really people at all.
THE REST:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/the-only-kind-of-sex-conservatives-can-rally-to-defend-non-consensual/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 764 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The only kind of sex conservatives can rally to defend: non-consensual( ie: rape) (Original Post)
Triana
Oct 2014
OP
Trillo
(9,154 posts)1. That's sad. NT
treestar
(82,383 posts)2. We as a society decided to limit ethanol in gas tanks
or whatever other sacrosanct right he thinks there is to pollute the environment. Does he really think without the EPA that industry would not pollute as much as it could get away with?
The football team name concern is not coming from the government.
He's an idiot. He should be happy about sex on campus being controlled - it's not being controlled the way he wants is all - he's have dorm mothers for the girls again.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)3. I never thought of it that way before but that is exactly right. nt