Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

world wide wally

(21,733 posts)
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 06:15 PM Oct 2014

Can someone answer this question please?

How does ISIL keep advancing on major cities like Baghdad ad Korbane if they are being bombed?

I have seen photos of them marching down the road in broad daylight, yet the fighter planes can't find them?

If someone can explain this...I am all ears.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can someone answer this question please? (Original Post) world wide wally Oct 2014 OP
I wondered the same thing. femmocrat Oct 2014 #1
Good point. If they have enough heavy weaponry, artillery and vehicles CJCRANE Oct 2014 #2
If I were conspiracy-minded, I'd venture that the air strikes are deliberately ineffective. arcane1 Oct 2014 #3
A fighter plane flies thousands of feet in the air at a very high rate of speed Cali_Democrat Oct 2014 #4
No radar of any kind? No drone survellience? world wide wally Oct 2014 #6
They mostly use civilian vehicles AngryAmish Oct 2014 #5
I have been asking these questions for weeks... SomethingFishy Oct 2014 #7
I like your scenario world wide wally Oct 2014 #9
Obviously they've got a great ground game and a lot of local support Warpy Oct 2014 #8
There is no army to stop them. kentuck Oct 2014 #10
they're using the same onethatcares Oct 2014 #11
Let's not forget this absurdity: arcane1 Oct 2014 #12
see, it's all perfectly logical onethatcares Oct 2014 #13

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
1. I wondered the same thing.
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 06:17 PM
Oct 2014

Are they not bombing the convoys? I thought those drones could see an ant on the ground.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
2. Good point. If they have enough heavy weaponry, artillery and vehicles
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 06:23 PM
Oct 2014

to take a town or attack a city, that implies they have stuff that can be targeted.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
3. If I were conspiracy-minded, I'd venture that the air strikes are deliberately ineffective.
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 06:27 PM
Oct 2014

Therefore making "boots on the ground" appear more necessary

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
4. A fighter plane flies thousands of feet in the air at a very high rate of speed
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 06:29 PM
Oct 2014

Hard to target a single person and/or a small moving vehicle like a pickup truck.

The planes are more suited for hitting fixed targets like buildings.

Simple.

Where my money?

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
5. They mostly use civilian vehicles
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 06:30 PM
Oct 2014

Teucks and minivans. Hard to tell who the bad guys are from 50000 feet.

They dont wear uniforms.

This is so stupid. We are doomed to lose. The only way to win is unthinkable to us. Then why fight this stupid war?

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
7. I have been asking these questions for weeks...
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 06:33 PM
Oct 2014

This whole thing seems insane to me. They say ISIS, ISIL, ISSA whatever the fuck they are called today, has 30,000 members.(probably up to 50 by now thanks to us) Yet we are shitting in our pants like they are the next coming of Hitler. I was reading a list of the US military capabilities and the whole thing is ridiculous. We have more small armored vehicles than they have people in their entire army. We have 1 tank for every three members of ISIS. We have enough small arms that we don't even need fucking bullets, we could just drop them from the sky and conk people on the head with them...

Bambie Vs Godzilla, except Godzilla is crapping in his pants. Bambi's coming to Tokyo to get him don't ya know...

Warpy

(111,106 posts)
8. Obviously they've got a great ground game and a lot of local support
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 06:39 PM
Oct 2014

which means that either they're not the mad dog butchers the media are claiming they are or local populations are supporting them only because they're the first really credible opposition to being overrun by the west that they've seen in nearly a century.

kentuck

(111,035 posts)
10. There is no army to stop them.
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 06:48 PM
Oct 2014

It seems like Turkey, the Kurds, and Iraq would be discussing how they can each send troops in from three different directions to counter them? And surround them. Look for a surrender. I mean, how many battalions are we talking about here??

onethatcares

(16,160 posts)
11. they're using the same
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 07:10 PM
Oct 2014

convoys that moved the WMDs out of Iraq prior to the initial invasion.

They are protected by a cloak of invisibility that allows them to move through the space/time continuum without being seen by
any one but Condi Rice and Dick the Impaler.

Sheeesh, what other reason could there be?

onethatcares

(16,160 posts)
13. see, it's all perfectly logical
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 07:41 PM
Oct 2014

you just need to have a pair of x-ray specs and even Ray Charles can see what's going on.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can someone answer this q...