Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
Thu Oct 9, 2014, 04:27 PM Oct 2014

The Two Paradoxes of Democracy

1. Reform in a democratic system requires the consent of the corrupt.

2. Strong citizens tend to elect weak leaders, who then disappoint. Weak citizens tend to elect strong leaders, who then betray them for greed or power. A strong nation must have strong citizens and strong leaders, at the same time, and on the same side.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Two Paradoxes of Democracy (Original Post) True Blue Door Oct 2014 OP
You say "weak leaders" like it's a bad thing Warpy Oct 2014 #1
Strength and dictatorship have nothing to do with each other. True Blue Door Oct 2014 #2

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
1. You say "weak leaders" like it's a bad thing
Thu Oct 9, 2014, 04:38 PM
Oct 2014

Democracy doesn't want leaders, it wants public servants who will work for their employers, the people.

Leaders are for people who want dictatorships or monarchies.

Leaders are for the buzzard type birds.

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
2. Strength and dictatorship have nothing to do with each other.
Thu Oct 9, 2014, 10:04 PM
Oct 2014

Washington, Lincoln, FDR were strong leaders, but not dictators by any stretch of the imagination. Nixon was both strong and had profoundly dictatorial features. George W. Bush was a weak dictator.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Two Paradoxes of Demo...