General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSt. Louis Cardinals fans chant “Africa! Africa!” at Ferguson protesters
Ferguson protestors emerged at Busch Stadium last night after game three of the NLDS playoff game between the St. Louis Cardinals and the visiting Los Angeles Dodgers; and wow, did things get ugly real fast.
<...>
At the top of the video, an older gentleman looks directly at the camera and shouts about how if these (all-black) protestors had been working (at night?) we wouldnt have this problem!
The crowd soon begins chanting Lets go Cardinals! to drown out the protestors chant about shutting the shit down if they arent given justice for slain 18-year-old Michael Brown. That Cards chant quickly changed into Lets go Darren! referring to Officer Darren Wilson, the Ferguson cop who killed the young man.
<...>
While one protestor waves an upside-down American flag (symbolic of country in distress), a blonde lady enters, telling the crowd: Were the ones who fuckin gave all yall the freedoms that you have! Another lady takes it upon herself to question the cameramans background, suggesting she doesnt believe hes an ex-Marine, while asking incoherent questions about his rank. All fun times.
Peppered throughout the rest of the video are USA! USA! chants from the Cards fans, along with one woman getting real clever and shouting at the protestors: Africa! Africa! There were also more calls for the protestors to get jobs, pick up their pants, and remove their caps.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cringe-at-the-ugly-way-these-cardinals-fans-taunt-ferguson-protestors/
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)The Cardinals, on the other hand, should be worried about their public image. With fans like these...
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Sports fandom is all about entertainment. Please don't confuse it with something of importance, like bigotry.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)It will be scary to see the same people that were encouraged to finally stop pretending they did not hate black people get the same momentum when they decide they can stop pretending to hate women.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Those are some of the people who will be cheering her campaign
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)many of those people are the ones Hillary thinks she can win over, so she will trot Bill out again to say shit like "I got mugged" or "Not as far as I know" or any of the gaffes Hillary should have known better than to allow Bill to say. They are also the ones that will get twice the time and support when she gets elected.
merrily
(45,251 posts)That was the culmination of a number of "racially-tinged" events in her campaign, "racially-tinged" being a term I never encountered before I heard it used to describe things that Bill Clinton, Ferrara, Cuomo, etc. said on behalf of Hillary.
And then, there was this, from "the first black President," who told Ted Kennedy that the only reason TK was backing Obama was that Obama was African American.
Bill Clinton On Obama: 'A Few Years Ago, This Guy Would Have Been Getting Us Coffee'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/10/game-change-bill-clinton-_n_417546.html
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Bit of alcohol always helps with the racism and rants also, I bet.
sheshe2
(83,654 posts)On Sat Oct 11, 2014, 09:01 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
St. Louis fans? Red neck racists more like it. A suit may make the man, a jersey not so much.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5653873
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
What a broad brush attack. We have a lot of St. Louis fans here on DU. They're not "red neck racists".
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Oct 11, 2014, 09:16 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I think the Reply was calling the fans who were chanting "Africa!" the racists, not the St Louis fans. Fred is saying the chanters are racists, not the fans of St. Louis.
Its a misunderstanding that Fred should clarify.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I read it differently than the alerter.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Fred needs to dial things back a little.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: with all due respect to the alerter, the comment was directed at red-neck racists in the stadium
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No it was not a broad brush. Fred was responding to the fans racist remarks in the OP. You did watch the video correct, that is who he was responding to! Don't make this about you unless it is.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm going to go with 'leave', because it's unclear whether the alerted-upon commenter is actually broad-brushing all St Louis fans, or is actually in agreement with the alerter, and is specifically saying the specific people chanting 'Africa' are 'red neck racists' and shouldn't be referred to as 'St Louis fans' as in the original story.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Leave It Alone
"Explanation: I'm going to go with 'leave', because it's unclear whether the alerted-upon commenter is actually broad-brushing all St Louis fans, or is actually in agreement with the alerter, and is specifically saying the specific people chanting 'Africa' are 'red neck racists' and shouldn't be referred to as 'St Louis fans' as in the original story."
This is my 90th day since my last hide....tragic if I got another 90 days of probation.
sheshe2
(83,654 posts)There are a lot of alert happy trigger fingers here.
enough
(13,255 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)probably time for some self-policing...
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Gore1FL
(21,102 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)If a group of fans is acting like this, it means other fans need to stand up to them AS FANS! These folks clearly had a purpose of a different nature, and don't seem to have as much invested in the outcome of the games. So, there is no excuse for the behavior of the "superfans."
Gore1FL
(21,102 posts)Trouble makers look for trouble. So does the media.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)It's a cultural issue with St. Louis. No group has stood up against it.
Gore1FL
(21,102 posts)Because living here for almost 50 years obviously puts me at a disadvantage when it comes to knowledge of the area.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)the yokels yelling 'Let's Go Darren'?? I sure as hell didn't.
BTW, all the pro-Cardinals fans in video I can see are white. Co-inky-dink? Methinks not.
Gore1FL
(21,102 posts)I live here. You are making assumption based on limited information.
Have a nice day.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)cops by the actions of a few bad apples."
Well, excuse me, until the good cops start arresting the bad cops, that particular trope should be laid to rest.
Same goes with fans.
I have relatives who live in the greater St. Louis area (and are big Cards fans). Short of wearing sheets and hoods, they're about as racist as they come in post-60s America. We're talking driving down the road, seeing a driver do something they don't like and shouting "You fu*king n****r" immediately, like some reflex action. Often times said driver is white, but makes no difference.
I'm ashamed to admit I share the same gene pool (mother's side) with these lumpenproles. I haven't had anything to do with these relatives for 25-odd years, but seeing this video sure triggered some personal memories. I was searching the crowd half-expecting to see my relatives there.
So forgive me for making assumptions based on limited information but also on directly-experienced personal history.
Gore1FL
(21,102 posts)You're an idiot.
branford
(4,462 posts)Oktober
(1,488 posts)Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)paleotn
(17,884 posts)...nope, nada. What a wonderful, post racial society we live in.
aggiesal
(8,907 posts)there is no more racism, so it must true.
We all know how revered the Supreme Court is these days.
RKP5637
(67,088 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)in light of this, I hope the fucking Cardinals lose.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)This was a bunch of idiot, racist fans. Could happen at any sporting event.
GO CARDS !!!
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Should have said "I hope the Cardinals fucking lose." Sorry.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)That I can accept.
And they did.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)And if KC wins, wouldn't THAT be something.
And my closest friend for 50 some years is a Baltimore fan, from Baltimore.
What to do, what to do?
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Listen to your heart.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)refuse to play.
St. Louis can have its racism and white supremacy or it can have its silly baseball game, but it CAN'T HAVE BOTH!
Response to KingCharlemagne (Reply #54)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Gemini Cat
(2,820 posts)A whole lot of ugly there.
Post racial America, my ass.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)like the symphony, and this playoff game, where people pay for expensive tickets to get in. Did they not expect some sort of blowback?
Frankly, I think they're hurting their cause, as they make people who have no stake in the outcome of the shooting start thinking about taking a side in this...
marmar
(77,056 posts)Yes, they make them shout idiotic, racist chants. Jesus, Mary and Joseph.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)What's important is what's going on in the minds of those not saying anything.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)First they can't even go out to lunch, now they can't go to sports games.
We shall overcome!
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #26)
Name removed Message auto-removed
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)you don't piss them off. Not a tough concept to understand.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)without being reminded of other people's problems.
Hands up! Don't bug!
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)for the Occupy Wall Street protesters, why I was so inspired when the banksters were frog-marched into waiting patrol cars.
You've got to be smart about picking the time, place, and content of your message if you really want to get people on your side instead of alienating them.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Oh wait, no they fucking didn't.
Thanks for playing the nirvana fallacy game though.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)And what goals have they accomplished? They sure look like they fizzled out to me, but your perception may vary.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)The camps are gone, but Occupy isn't. It doesn't function like that anymore, but that doesn't mean they've all but disappeared. Anyone who's had their medical debts relieved by StrikeDebt can attest to that.
Not to mention they singlehandedly changed the discussion almost overnight in this country to income inequality and gave a real platform for people like Warren to surge in popularity.
If you think Occupy didn't accomplish anything just because the bankers are still in power and capitalism still exists, then you're not paying the slightest bit of attention.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)Elizabeth Warren got elected after OWS started, but I think that would have happened anyway.
Yes, there are some people talking about income inequality, but in a few weeks we'll have more results at the ballot box about how their discussions were received. If the Repukes take over the Senate, then will it mean that OWS really isn't a factor any more?
StrikeDebt is just another charity that gathers donations and delivers them to people in need. It's hardly revolutionary, although I do acknowledge the good that it does for people. Also, it's financed in a conventional way, seeking voluntary donations, and not shaking people down in the street.
I suggest that the Ferguson protesters learn from this example, and choose carefully the ways they go about to get their message across. Baseball playoff games might not be the very best venue to find sympathy for their cause.
Iggo
(47,535 posts)There should probably be separate fenced-off areas where these unruly people can protest, away from the good decent expensive ticket holders.
And we could give these areas a cute name, like Free Speech Zones.
Aw, yeah! That'd be great!
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)where people can protest, and the local news will always cover them. You want to persuade people to your point of view, not alienate them.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)It'd be one thing if they'd just yelled at them to shut up or something. But they went far beyond that and showed their racism for all to see
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)is crystal clear where they stand on the issue. It's the folks who didn't say racist things that I feel the protesters should be concerned about. Matching bad manners with bad behavior may just have those folks conclude that neither side is right, at best. At worst, it makes those who didn't participate in the taunts affirm that they will indeed do so at the next opportunity.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 11, 2014, 11:10 PM - Edit history (1)
Those poor racists who paid a lot of money for tickets.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)Remember the ACT-UP activists who would disrupt religious services of those they considered in opposition? Yeah, that brought about a cure for AIDS/HIV really fast, didn't it.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)to go right up to the line.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)Am I wrong to articulate a point of view that the tactics being used by some of the Ferguson protesters may well be counterproductive?
branford
(4,462 posts)It was, at best, futile, and more generally, hostile.
I sadly think many follow an "any means necessary" approach to these important issues, and you're essentially with them, or against them.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)feel that 'revolution' is all they have left available to them. It almost never works out for the revolutionaries.
Oktober
(1,488 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I agreed with pretty much all of your points and found it baffling people were questioning you intentions when you seem so straight-forward. With that said, I'd be very careful allying yourself with this poster. Let's say there is a "history" which I have not seen regarding your posts.
branford
(4,462 posts)That's kind of the point. However, I do understand your concerns and take your meaning, and your warning is appreciated.
Nevertheless, regardless of who may raise them, the basic issues still stand and are often a great detriment to our party and policies - what amounts to a purity test among Democrats and self-styled "revolutionary" policies and actions that are not only are not widely supported, but counterproductive and actually alienate and anger potential allies.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)the "to the line" comment didn't come out of nowhere. Certain things said here can seem strange or out-of-place without background.
In regards, I agreed with you hacking the accounts of t-shirt makers or finding some way to shut them down (going for copyright infringement--how many sports team are named Cardinals?) when the best thing to do is ignore them. Another option is reason with them but I found trying to reason w/ many racists/bigots is as effective as banging my head against the wall but you may earn a few converts that way.
As far as the sub-thread goes the protest was non-violent & peaceful which you agreed in the other thread was the preferred choice while customerserviceguy argued the presence & place could sway those "on the fence" to the other side but I think that is weak. You have people making racist comments publicly(how does the affect those "on the fence" so why do the protesters or anyone on this side of the issue always have to worry about how to act when the other side doesn't a system that doesn't play fair to begin with.
Most people note MLK as being more effective than other leaders at-the-time, I agree but I also feel he is more effective that most US Presidents and other notable people throughout history but I feel the whole movement led to change. With things going in Calfornia, New York, the South, and the Midwest change was inevitable.
Dustlawyer
(10,494 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)And it's the job of the protesters to educate those Americans who think that it's somebody else's problem that they are incorrect. I'm just saying that you catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar.
shallwechat
(13 posts)The concert goes at the symphony were not calling them by stereotypical names. The conductor stooped, the audience listened and both audience and orchestra members clapped politely, and conductor resumed.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)I risk being stereotypical if I said that symphony goers were more sophisticated people than those attending a sports event, but I'll take that risk. I do recall some discussion here of some of the symphony attendees being less than thrilled about the protest, however.
What we don't know is what those who neither jeered nor clapped thought about this, and how it will influence their future decisions about this issue.
yesiwasacop
(93 posts)as opposed to the game. Get people a little liquored up and they just might say something they wouldnt otherwise.
I agree that going and interrupting an event people paid to see is probably counterproductive. Those who are on the side of Brown will still be, those who already were not, probably will not change their mind. Those on the fence- well I'm betting most are not impressed.Sure maybe a few are, but I'm betting the majority now have a negative opinion, as if the images of Ferguson businesses being torched didnt already give them a negative vibe.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)But as the Romans said, "In vino veritas" or in English, "In wine there is truth" perhaps the ballgame attendees were being honest about their feelings (admittedly in a very boorish way) that the symphony attendees who were less than sympathetic were willing to admit in that venue.
Yes, the protest needs to be sincere and frequent, but it needs to do so in such a way as it captivates the attention and interest of the target audience, without ticking them off and causing them to come to a snap decision that the protest is unworthy of their support or further attention.
Rex
(65,616 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)A lot of folks here think that the Sixties were a time of great progress, but it wasn't all peace, love and pot. I vividly recall the fears of race wars from 1965 through 1968 which took place AFTER the great civil rights Acts of the post-JFK era were enacted.
"Burn, baby, burn" might have sounded like a good idea to people who thought they had nothing to lose, but it led to Richard Nixon winning the election with his "silent majority" responding to his campaign slogan of "Law and Order". Yes, it was a dog whistle long before it was the title of a series of cop and lawyer shows. And that was with George Wallace bleeding off the votes of the most racist parts of the electorate in all fifty states. Nixon won on Election Night without the 45 electoral votes of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia.
How's that for a "kewl story", bro? Scares the crap out of me.
branford
(4,462 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)It seemed that the rioters of the 65-68 period suddenly learned that nothing positive would result from further urban destruction, and suddenly stopped. That seemed to further reinforce the "law and order" message of Nixon, unfortunately.
branford
(4,462 posts)Rioting and other violence, at best, may provide a fleeting sense of cathartic release , but in the long-term, will destroy mostly minority-owned homes and businesses, will change few minds, and may actually justify and reinforce the very racism it opposes as many whites and others, who before did not hold racist views, watch on their TV's and computers as large group of minorities burn their own towns and cities and hurt innocents for nothing less than the color of their skin.
The current generation has mostly avoided these gruesome images. It is for the best, and I hope the protesters follow the example of MLK.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)for people to respond in racist ways when they're bummed out about their event being interrupted? I might be able to see your argument if they'd just expressed upset about the inconvenience, but the way they responded was specifically racist, and nice people don't respond like that even if they're inconvenienced or upset or both.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)for some people, especially when engaged in a 'tribal' event (such as cheering on their sports team with tens of thousands of like-minded people around them) to react in ways they would not attempt in one-on-one situations where they were not faceless and nameless.
Look at the difference between the racism openly expressed on Internet postings versus what you see in everyday life. Anonymity confers a shield that allows inappropriate things to be said.
Road rage is a more common form of "you get in my face, well, goddam it, I'll get back in yours". This protest at a major sporting event could have been expected to produce a non-sympathetic result. I surmise that the protesters planned it that way, to get even more coverage of their protest.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)People who would turn to racism at a sporting event are holding racism in their hearts, and it might very well be that a lot of people harbor racist feelings, but that doesn't make it OK.
And I feel very sure that no protestors would hope that people would react like that. They would know it was a possibility, but there is no way they planned for it to exploit it to get more coverage of their protest. That's just a mean spirited thing to say.
Also, a sporting even does not make people behave more "tribally" and therefore become more racist. That's just ridiculous.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)They're not always going to be perceived well, and they should carefully consider where they protest next, because that latent racism is more likely to come out in some venues than others.
As for the "tribal" thing, I offer the occasional beatings of those wearing the 'wrong' team's gear to a game. Sports often encourages an 'us versus them' mentality, and little is done to curb taunting of the other team by fans of the home team.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"some sort of blowback? "
I can certainly understand the sentiment many have to use "blowback" rather than more accurate and telling appellations of their reactions...
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)non-positive response have been more acceptable to you? I just grabbed the first word that popped in my head, sorry that it was not precise enough for you.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)"Africa, Africa" -- seriously?
If they weren't supporters of the other side already, they would make horrible allies if they choose a side over outrage at an injustice.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)when it comes to where one stands on the community vs. the cops situation in Ferguson. It's people in the middle who have not yet decided which side to stand with who matter at this point. Alienating them isn't going to win friends for either side.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Morans define 'merica.
(Note the tshirt)
[IMG][/IMG]
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Rhinodawg
(2,219 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)This is really sad.
Response to gollygee (Reply #19)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NBachers
(17,081 posts)I really don't care how much it corrodes her innards, but it's corroding our nation and our planet, too.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)alp227
(32,006 posts)Thankfully, these bigots are willing to show off their bigotry to their targets' faces.
By the way, my GIANTS are loadin' the bases in the top of the 7th with a 3-0 lead. Stay classy, Cards fans. Yankees fans are starting to look like decent human beings now.
joanbarnes
(1,721 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)He has testified in front of a grand jury and has not been charged with anything. He is not a fugitive.
To whom should he surrender? I don't think any law enforcement agency is looking for him.
branford
(4,462 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Oktober
(1,488 posts)Response to joanbarnes (Reply #37)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)That sums it up for a lot of people.
How mindless.
Cha
(296,860 posts)sheshe2
(83,654 posts)That is what crawled up her ass! Stupid Stupid People!
So very ugly!
Cha
(296,860 posts)http://theobamadiary.com/2014/10/08/the-truth-about-racism-in-140-characters/
BAM! Michael Brown
"Because We are Americans .We have paid for our citizenship through our blood sweat . and tears "
You.. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5636803
sheshe2
(83,654 posts)Thanks for the replay. Perfect!
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)to use my Twitter account. Well stated all around.
Cha
(296,860 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Fear too. Fear of losing I don't know what. They definitely have losr compassion, empathy, and a sense of a just world.
sheshe2
(83,654 posts)My thoughts? They are afraid of losing their "White America".
By Hope Yen, Associated Press
For the first time, America's racial and ethnic minorities now make up about half of the under-5 age group, the government said Thursday. It's a historic shift that shows how young people are at the forefront of sweeping changes by race and class.
The new census estimates, a snapshot of the U.S. population as of July 2012, comes a year after the Census Bureau reported that whites had fallen to a minority among babies. Fueled by immigration and high rates of birth, particularly among Hispanics, racial and ethnic minorities are now growing more rapidly in numbers than whites.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/13/18934111-census-white-majority-in-us-gone-by-2043?lite
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Yes, I'm using sports as a proxy. It makes me happy when San Francisco wins, and even more so when they beat my 1%er boss's team. I consider it a bonus that the racists shown above are crying in their beers right now.
Iggo
(47,535 posts)But I am in this series.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I don't have personal animus toward the Cardinals or any of their players, but I do hope my boss ("taxes are theft" wasted a lot of money on his tickets. This ugly racism on display is a whole other thing, and it embarrasses me as an American that we've regressed so far.
Iggo
(47,535 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I'm in no way defending those in the "crowd" but it appears it was about 10 idiots who were yelling "Darren", the majority of people seem to be just standing there.
When they were doing the "let's go Mike Brown, let's go Cardinals" I think that was fairly respectable.
It is a handful of drunk white idiots who are being assholes.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)THIS is what is under the surface. This is what fox-nonsense denies 24/7, and they act as if they are surprised anyone would even accuse America of being a racist nation. It comes to the surface, and it shows bright and ugly in this story. Racism is a alive and festering in America, and don't kid yourself.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)any protests at today's game?
damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)navarth
(5,927 posts)I just watched as much of that video as I could. If I was a Cardinals fan I would be mortified. I would have expected a lot of those white folks to be supportive and chanting with the protestors, not saying 'let's go Darren'. I continue to be shocked at how badly we're doing in America.
What the fuck. Just what the fuck.
(on edit) Maybe I should go out of my way to point out that I have no reason to think the fine city of St. Louis is any worse than anyplace else. We've got our share of racist assholes in the Detroit area (I've seen and heard them) and other cities have this trouble too. It's not confined to one place. I can tell you truthfully I've never seen anything this ugly in D Town but I won't make any claims of being holier than thou. I can guarantee you that I would have climbed over the fence and joined the protestors though. Count on that.
Edited for fairness.
Response to navarth (Reply #57)
Name removed Message auto-removed
navarth
(5,927 posts)I saw it before it got trashed. I remember the name. There's no way that could have been a DUer. I'll be watching to see if that fucking asshole posts again. That's all I feel safe in saying, I don't know if it's allowed to say more.
Once again I am disappointed and angry about the ugliness in people.
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)goddamit
Rex
(65,616 posts)Pictures sure do have a way of bringing out the true person inside.
logosoco
(3,208 posts)I have lived in the St. Louis area my whole life. I joke that I was being built at the same time as the original Busch Stadium and just mention the word Cardinals at any time of the year and my family is talking. So this really hurts to see these fans showing their ignorance.
They don't even seem to understand that when they are chanting "USA! USA!" they are speaking of a country with a Constitution that has an amendment that protects unreasonable searches. That is a big part of what the protesters are speaking up about.
From the pictures, I am guessing that many of these people don't really have a clue of what it is like to walk around and be harassed by the police. So they can't understand why it would bother anyone else.
But that one who shouted about "giving freedoms", somebody really needs to send her back to school. Being ignorant is one thing, but shouting those stupid things is just wrong.
merrily
(45,251 posts)MIRT seems to be all over this thread, thank goodness.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)They hate it when their racism gets exposed.
They usually get banned within minutes after their first post.
Their posts usually consist of tirades against black people and white liberals.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Cardinals out!
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)These fans aren't too happy tonight...