Fox Guest Slut-Shames Upskirt Victims: They ‘Made A Conscious Choice To Wear Certain Clothes’ (VIDEO

[ashling]

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/10/12/fox-guest-slut-shames-upskirt-victims-they-made-a-conscious-choice-to-wear-certain-clothes-video/

Last week, Christopher Cleveland was let off the hook by D.C. Superior Court Judge Juliet McKenna after she ruled that the upskirt photos Cleveland took of women sitting on the Memorial Lincoln steps were perfectly legal, thanks to a loophole in the law. In this case, McKenna claimed that because these women were wearing dresses and were sitting in a public place, they had forfeited their right to privacy.

On a Sunday segment of Fox News’ Fox & Friends, former presecutor Jonna Spilbor and defense attorney Evangeline Gomez joined Fox News host Peter Johnson Jr. in a discussion about McKenna’s ruling.

Spilbor called McKenna’s decision “ludicrous,” stating that the ruling meant “a woman’s private parts will become public property by virtue of a wardrobe malfunction.”

However, Gomez agreed with McKenna’s choice, and that’s when things got heated.

[Stargazer99]

1. all ladies should wear pants, jeans

dressmakers would cry foul, but it would solve the problem

[jen63]

5. We shouldn't have to censor

what we wear. I would also say that the Fox News women had better be on guard also, considering their wardrobes.

[Iamthetruth]

10. Oh hell no

Why would anyone want that.

[seabeyond]

2. yes. i am seeing a HUGE effort with men justifying, lack of consent. lack of consent is not

a hard one to understand. and it USED to be the argument for the porn. you know. consent. that is so lacking in the porn industry.

yes. men have all the rights, when it comes to sexualizing women, regardless of consent or otherwise.

that is basically the argument we hear today.... per all the lack of consent porn being thrown out there for mans enjoyment and entertainment.

[Supersedeas]

8. i'm not sure consent is the real issue when there is an intentional intrusion into one's privacy

[seabeyond]

9. it may not be your "real" issue. it is a damn start in the justification of violating womens bodies

one way or another, for mens amusement and entertainment.

i will decide what my "real" issues are without help from you.

[lpbk2713]

3. This is Faux. They are all idiots by default.

They made a conscious decision to back and vote for Mitt rMoney.

[The Magistrate]

4. An Incredibly Bad Decision, Sir

[stevenleser]

7. Agreed. nt

[Nye Bevan]

6. Many people take photographs in front of the Lincoln Memorial.

If men are concerned about their intimate areas appearing on these photographs they should not sit on the steps in front of the memorial while wearing short kilts.

The guy in this case was undoubtedly a creep but did not break the law.