General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould Allison Lundergan Grimes have answered who she voted for?
21 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
YES | |
12 (57%) |
|
NO | |
9 (43%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Rosco T.
(6,496 posts)Her proper answer should have been "none of your dammed business"
Logical
(22,457 posts)kentuck
(111,079 posts)And Andrea also.
This is an ad that could have been running in Kentucky today:
"Yes, I voted for Barack Obama and I am very proud of that vote." I'm Mitch McConnell and I approve this message.
Do you think that would have been a winning answer in Kentucky??
Rosco T.
(6,496 posts)Debra919
(2 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)she has been distancing herself from Obama the whole campaign.
Logical
(22,457 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)I wouldnt ask a new employee if they are pro chice, but its a fair question to ask a Senator.
She is allowed to avoid the question, but Mitch is allowed to try to use that against her.
Its not like people dont assume she voted for Obama anyway. If she would have said "I voted for Obama because I thought he was a better choice than Romney, bit I disagree with Obama on A B and C, nobody would have said anything. Instead she might spend the next three weeks avoiding the question, which huts her ability to get her message across.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)Will it prove to be the best strategy? Maybe but I don't see it. She needs to drive over vote in the black community far more desperately than she needs anti Obama marginal Democrats from what I can see because I don't believe she can get too many of them. They will stick with McConnell for pure pork power his position and longevity help drive.
Also, while I think they will turn around there are those who rankled at the obvious hedging and likely their enthusiasm is dampened with little opportunity to recover.
This is not a Presidential year which means it is much more a base turnout driven situation.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Instead of trying to dodge and evade it, she should have made a definitive statement one way or the other...
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Because that's what should matter.
kentuck
(111,079 posts)"Was it worth it for Grimes to answer the question if it costs her the election?"
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)kelly1mm
(4,732 posts)funding for ad buys. Maybe it was a damned if you do, damned if you don't decision?
kentuck
(111,079 posts)That is an interesting development. I don't think it will hurt her that much. It will only point out her independence, which will help her in Kentucky, in my humble opinion. Also, does Hillary cancel her appearance with her this week??
kelly1mm
(4,732 posts)I do not know if Hillary is still a go (I would assume yes).
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Now that she has shown her reticence in answering
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)We would not have this poll had she done that. It's a distraction that she doesn't need.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)scarystuffyo
(733 posts)and right now she's thinking the same thing and wishes she could do it over again.
She knows she messed up and people who are defending her non-answer is weird
The_Commonist
(2,518 posts)It might be a "secret ballot," but she's not a secret person.
She's a public figure running for office on the Democratic ticket.
She should have said "Of course I voted for Obama, you nit-wit! I'm a Democrat, and I'm proud of it."
jen63
(813 posts)and I don't care if she's running in a political campaign or just walking down the street. Our rights have been eroded enough and answering McConnell's question would set a dangerous precedent. The frog is almost at full boil folks.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Which should have been, "I loved for President Obama". It might have been I one commercial that McConnell made, but now she is getting much worse slack that does not seem to be going away.
jen63
(813 posts)that's what everyone is missing. It should be obvious to everyone any way. Ridiculous.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Or worse didn't vote at all. Sorry it just is.
jen63
(813 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)It totally doesn't matter. Only voters in Kuntucky and the heads of the Democratic Party have a decision to make. They only matter when deciding if she was wrong or not.
pansypoo53219
(20,972 posts)reminds me of that question at the 1st 1984 debate by that black guy. BULLSHIT!
Logical
(22,457 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)lpbk2713
(42,753 posts)But it would have been appropriate AFAIC.
riqster
(13,986 posts)...there was no option for "Oh, HELL no!"
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)At least he isnt ducking an easy question.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)3catwoman3
(23,973 posts)...choice.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Because not answering the question drives the right more insane.
kentuck
(111,079 posts)I don't think she loses anything with her response. In the short term, a bit of confusion. In the longer run, a net positive for her.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I would like to see what he does if someone asks his history from 1952-to present.
JVS
(61,935 posts)supported in the most recent presidential election should be a matter of public record. We shouldn't even need to ask.
jen63
(813 posts)should be public record?
JVS
(61,935 posts)riversedge
(70,187 posts)Wonder if she did not vote for Obama?? Just asking--or wondering...
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)"The idea of voting for Romney was absurd."
Pretty simple.
blogslut
(37,999 posts)moondust
(19,972 posts)Secret ballot, private matter.
"None of your business." Game over.
It reminds me of the grotesquely biased hit job the media did on Al Gore in 2000. Everything he said or did was presented in a negative light while everything Bush did was presented in a neutral or positive light or simply ignored.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Distancing herself as far away from Obama as possible (while McConnell doing exactly the opposite) is obviously the main component of her campaign strategy, by not answering the question she told me she voted for Obama.
Personally, I feel candidates should be more straight forward and those candidates I trust more to do the right thing but if you're going to play the middle better be good at it. I remember in the height of SB 1070 it was difficult to pin where a Democrat running for top Arizona offices on where they stood on it they still suffered crushing defeats while Felicia Rotellini (who I voted for in the primaries that year because she appeared to be the most progressive candidate) took a clear stand & was outspoken on it and suffered a very narrow defeat. It took a few days to determine the winner.
She is running again this year for AG again and while I constant ads basically suggesting that the 3 main targets (Kirkpatrick, guy running for governor, and Kristen Sinema) are going to open up the border and let the terrorists run free Rotellini's attack ad basically is limited to she has never prosecuted violent criminals (her area was more fraud and white collar type crimes) & "liberal agenda".
Though I respect Kristen Sinema a lot so I don't lump her with the play-the-middle Democrats that still get attacked badly. Like Rotellini, I voted for her in the primary because she appeared to be the most progressive and winning in my district which was luckily redistricted to include most of Tempe & ASU campus.
On edit - I also really don't like the question itself because a real journalist would simply question Lundergran Grimes on her strategy to distance herself rather than something that appears to be a trick question relating to that topic.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)to stand up for what she believes in. We have enough Democratic-in-name-only types in the House and the Senate.
If a Repuke failed to say that he'd voted for McCain and/or Romney, we'd lambaste him for being a weasel, trying to play it both ways. I don't see anything unfair about the question, and the re-questioning.
Stand for something, or you'll fall for anything.
Erose999
(5,624 posts)"Clinton Democrat" = potential backstabber.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)I voted for Obama? Why? Her supporters, democrats and people who came around to favoring her all probably assumed she did. It is quite possible that she did not vote for Obama, that would explain the silence and the support being pulled, especially if it is factual. Something fishy here I think.