Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:02 PM Oct 2014

Did the nurse with ebola get on the plane because she has learnt to shrug off scientific

warnings? In other words are the chickens coming home to roost after years of repukes and FOX dismissing scientists as having antiamerican agendas (climate change/fossil fuels), anti-religious agendas (evolution?

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did the nurse with ebola get on the plane because she has learnt to shrug off scientific (Original Post) snagglepuss Oct 2014 OP
No. She got on the plane because the CDC told her it was ok even with a fever. Nt riderinthestorm Oct 2014 #1
That's mindboggling advice. In_The_Wind Oct 2014 #5
It is fine advice. morningfog Oct 2014 #6
The hell? BlindTiresias Oct 2014 #18
I'll prove it in a few weeks. morningfog Oct 2014 #25
IOW you'll wait and see? n/t cherokeeprogressive Oct 2014 #42
and you get a free rainbow with every unicorn Man from Pickens Oct 2014 #24
Yup and this is why Frieden needs to lose his job. riderinthestorm Oct 2014 #7
imo: Anyone who was in contact with an Ebola patient shouldn't be traveling for 42 days. In_The_Wind Oct 2014 #10
Agreed. My experience is with animal quarantines which are almost always 60 days nt riderinthestorm Oct 2014 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #54
I can't even sorta understand the rest. magical thyme Oct 2014 #23
You've nailed the points well customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #51
But she didn't question the advice. I once called a telehealth line because snagglepuss Oct 2014 #9
What, the nurse should ignore the medical authority? Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #13
I wish I could recommend your post. She called the CDC multiple times (acc. to CBS) KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #29
+1 just shows how ugly JQPublic is gonna get with the victims here lunasun Oct 2014 #31
Or she was excessively trusting of authority figures. Crunchy Frog Oct 2014 #16
Thank you. Excessive trust placed in authority is troubling. snagglepuss Oct 2014 #36
NOT TRUE. Nurses "question" all the time. TexasMommaWithAHat Oct 2014 #56
She called them several times lunasun Oct 2014 #30
I'm not sure about the exact advice they gave mackerel Oct 2014 #43
She was not under quarantine. dumbcat Oct 2014 #45
Ooooh my bad. mackerel Oct 2014 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #53
Good grief! She's a Kent State Graduate TexasMommaWithAHat Oct 2014 #55
You have missed the news. Big Blue Marble Oct 2014 #2
Didn't you hear? Aerows Oct 2014 #3
She called the CDC and was cleared by the CDC to fly uponit7771 Oct 2014 #4
No Puzzledtraveller Oct 2014 #8
CDC has learned a sublime indifference to fact, that's for sure. Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #11
Your response my OP is outrageous. I never dissed the nurse. snagglepuss Oct 2014 #38
CDC is in control of the scientific/medical guidelines. Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #39
I asked a fucking question. What I see in society is a lot of people snagglepuss Oct 2014 #40
I would Rebl Oct 2014 #14
^^^^ THIS. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #15
No, just no Fumesucker Oct 2014 #17
+ 1000 nt riderinthestorm Oct 2014 #19
Plus they claim the victim may have shrugged off science !! And others claim she should not listen lunasun Oct 2014 #32
She trusted the CDC, like many here. nt ecstatic Oct 2014 #21
I lost a lot of respect for you because of this OP Fumesucker Oct 2014 #20
Yep. The little person was sick. yet DU expects Ilsa Oct 2014 #27
She called several times and if this and other posts here are any indication of general national lunasun Oct 2014 #33
I asked a fucking question. snagglepuss Oct 2014 #48
And I learnt you a reply ! lunasun Oct 2014 #49
I asked a fucking QUESTION. A fucking question. Where the fuck do you get snagglepuss Oct 2014 #47
Nice try - CDC does not TBF Oct 2014 #22
No, she contacted CDC and they didn't tell her not to fly. elleng Oct 2014 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author NuclearDem Oct 2014 #28
learnt? Maru Kitteh Oct 2014 #34
Thank you for asking for clarification. snagglepuss Oct 2014 #46
Did she get ebola from flying on a plane? Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #35
Common sense seems to be severely lacking all the way around. Avalux Oct 2014 #37
I too think it's more important to point fingers than to rationally discuss likely outcomes... LanternWaste Oct 2014 #41
I asked a effing question. The responses to a question staggers belief. snagglepuss Oct 2014 #44
I'd say it was because she had wedding plans to finalize, and that kind of task can override sense. WinkyDink Oct 2014 #50
No. It was pure selfishness. seveneyes Oct 2014 #52
she got on the plane because her wedding trumps all Skittles Oct 2014 #58
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
7. Yup and this is why Frieden needs to lose his job.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:18 PM
Oct 2014

The rest I can sorta understand it, but this?

No freaking way.

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
10. imo: Anyone who was in contact with an Ebola patient shouldn't be traveling for 42 days.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:21 PM
Oct 2014

But what do I know.

Response to In_The_Wind (Reply #10)

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
23. I can't even sorta understand the rest.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:54 PM
Oct 2014

1. Why was Frieden's first response, right out of the gate, to assume "protocol was breached?" Why did he not consider the possibility that protocol is inadequate?

2. Why are years of training, assistants to dress and undress, biosuits complete with hoods and filtered air respirators, followed by bleach showers, along with facilities specifically laid out and designed to minimize opportunities for contact and enable healthcare workers to safely undress considered necessary at the 4 BSL-4 hospital facilities?

But only droplet/contact precautions with lower legs and feet not fully protected and neck fully exposed -- or wrapped in effing tape -- considered perfectly fine for regular hospital staff?

I've said from the beginning that the CDC protocol was insufficient. I've yet to see the above questions answered in a reasonable way, probably because there isn't a reasonable answer.

3. Emory Hospital discovered with Brantly that they had no way to remove the hazardous waste. They dispatched workers to Home Depot to bring in large outside trash cans to temporarily and safely store it until arrangements were made with the CDC down the road to autoclave it prior to disposal.

How did the CDC prepare Dallas Presbyterian for the mountain of hazardous waste that a single Ebola patient generates? Apparently they didn't, which is how it ended up being pile up "to the ceiling" according to the anonymous nurses.

4. Why does the CDC say that more than 2 pairs of gloves is unsafe because it will take too long to take off the 3rd pair of gloves, when MSF, WHO and local African health care workers wear 3 and even 4 pairs of gloves?

5. CDC guidelines say to wash your hands immediately after removing the gloves. I can only speak for the rooms at the small hospital where I work. The sinks are not in the doorway; they are inside the room by the patient's bed. You cannot undress in the doorway and wash your hands immediately. You either use the pump by the door -- which is *not* as clean as washing your hands -- or you have to undress by the patient's bed to wash your hands immediately, leaving you exposed to unannounced projectile vomit.

6. Has Frieden actually ever worked in a regular hospital? And if so, in which century?

His performance to me has been nothing but hubris and bombast, followed by finger-pointing, followed by "oopsie" maybe we better rethink this.

Honestly, I can't understand why Duncan wasn't immediately shipped to one of the 4 hospitals equipped and staffed by specially trained people to deal with this.

If it hadn't been allowed to spread, it would be a single case. Now it's 3 cases. Who knows what tomorrow will bring.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
51. You've nailed the points well
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 07:12 PM
Oct 2014

Around here, we poke fun at the "nothing to see here, move on along" kind of attitude. I can't see that the CDC's done anything different from that.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
9. But she didn't question the advice. I once called a telehealth line because
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:21 PM
Oct 2014

I was violently ill for several days with serious diahearrea. I thought I might have had food poisoning. The nurse went through a list and said I couldn't have food poisoning because I didn't have a fever. I'm not in medicine but that seemed absurd so several days later I saw my doctor who did a test and discovered I had campoblactyer. Days later I found out that campoblactyer doesn't even cause fever.

Why I bring this up is that the nurse wasn't suspicious of the info she was given. It seems that the nurse lacked the understanding the ebola is extremely serious so she simply shrugged off her intuitions.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
13. What, the nurse should ignore the medical authority?
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:29 PM
Oct 2014

That's ridiculous. CDC IS THE MEDICAL AUTHORITY IN THE US.

If the poor lady had gotten sick where she was and then another hospital had been locked down and contaminated with more infected HCW, you probably would be blaming her for NOT following CDC advice.

Fuck, that just takes the cake. Go ahead and alert on this post, but I am outraged. Apparently there is nothing that an HCW can do to satisfy your high moral perspective but NOT GET EBOLA and inconvenience the nation. Who is going to take care of the patients if this is the attitude? Saints or insane people? Maybe you'd need to be in both categories?

I'm revolted by your attitude to this woman, who now is in danger of her life for doing her job and trying to care for a desperately ill person, and gets to be abused by a grateful nation for the opportunity.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
29. I wish I could recommend your post. She called the CDC multiple times (acc. to CBS)
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 10:41 PM
Oct 2014

and was given clearance each time she called. I mean, really, how much due diligence would satisfy these people?

It's bad enough to place your life at risk caring for someone with a deadly illness, but to be vilified for it?

Allow me to join you in saying "FUCK THIS SHIT!"

Crunchy Frog

(26,578 posts)
16. Or she was excessively trusting of authority figures.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:45 PM
Oct 2014

I do not believe that I would have gone along with this advice, but then I don't believe that the CDC are always right about everything.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
36. Thank you. Excessive trust placed in authority is troubling.
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 03:40 PM
Oct 2014

I can't believe the hostility this point has generated. One of the very few comments I have made on this topic was on another thread defending the nurse saying that nurses are taught to obey, not question.

There is a real problem in our society, authority is either completely revered (CDC) or completely dismissed (climate scientists).

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
56. NOT TRUE. Nurses "question" all the time.
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 08:54 PM
Oct 2014

If they give a patient a wrong dosage as written by the attending physician , they can lose their license.

Twelve hour shifts of taking care of patients and covering doctors' asses. Or cowering and tossing coins over who is going to call the attending physician at 2 a.m. because he is going to chew your ass off. No, most physicians are NOT like that, but nurses have no recourse against the ones who are.

Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #1)

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
55. Good grief! She's a Kent State Graduate
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 08:40 PM
Oct 2014

I don't think she's dumb. She called the CDC more than once about traveling back because she wanted desparated to believe that she didn't have ebola.

She's human. This is why doctors are not supposed to treat themselves or family.

DENIAL is not just a river in Egypt, ya' know.

And just for the record...SHE'S NOT FROM TEXAS!

These nurses were assured again and again that ebola was not easily transmitted.

No, I don't think she should have gone to Ohio, but this is what happens when the CDC drops the ball.

Big Blue Marble

(5,047 posts)
2. You have missed the news.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:05 PM
Oct 2014

She called the CDC several times prior to boarding and was told it was perfectly safe.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
3. Didn't you hear?
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:08 PM
Oct 2014

It's perfectly safe to ride public transportation, you can't contact it that way. If you suspect you might have been exposed to ebola, you shouldn't ride public transportation because you might infect someone.

That's the wisdom being doled out by the CDC's Frieden.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
11. CDC has learned a sublime indifference to fact, that's for sure.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:22 PM
Oct 2014

I believe you should feel ashamed of yourself for this post.

The lady followed the instructions she was given - EXACTLY. She called the number she was given for medical reporting and was told to get on that plane.

You people are all blaming the hospital and now individuals who were in fact following CDC instructions at the time.

This latest - that Frieden has held this lady up to scorn, when he should be lecturing himself in the mirror - makes the final case for his resignation.

I am not a nurse, but I am revolted and disgusted and outraged at the way these individuals - who were doing their job as they were told and following the instructions they were given - are now being scapegoated.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
38. Your response my OP is outrageous. I never dissed the nurse.
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 03:56 PM
Oct 2014

Where the fuck have I blamed anyone. What I brought up is the fact that she accepted without questioning what she was told. In another thread prior to my writing the OP I defended her on the grounds that nurse are taught to obey.


Every fucking person no matter who they are or what fucking position they hold has the responsibilty to QUESTION AUTHORITY.


I fact that she was doing exactly was she told, that she was doing exactly what she was taught to do which is to obey authority is the problem.


The hostility generated to my observation about someone obeying authority without question is actually illuminating though not the response I would have expected on DU.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
39. CDC is in control of the scientific/medical guidelines.
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 03:59 PM
Oct 2014

Your title is completely dismissive of the nurse's thought process. I would be amazed if anyone did not see your title as a slam on the nurse.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
40. I asked a fucking question. What I see in society is a lot of people
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 04:07 PM
Oct 2014

either shrugging off expert opinion or treating expert opinion as god's word, never to be questioned.

Rebl

(149 posts)
14. I would
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:38 PM
Oct 2014

think anyone with a little common sense would know they should have kept themselves isolated for a period of time. I don't care how many times she called the CDC, she should have known even if she had a slight fever, she might become worse and should NOT be flying possibly exposing others.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
17. No, just no
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:53 PM
Oct 2014

This whole OP is about science, the non-scientist called the scientists and they told her to do something that has a small but non-zero risk at this stage of the disease.

She called the scientists, the experts, the boffins.

And they fucked up.

And you want to ignore that to blame some poor woman with a terrible disease who may die from it.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
32. Plus they claim the victim may have shrugged off science !! And others claim she should not listen
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 01:32 AM
Oct 2014

To authorities
Looks like some of West Africa 's reactions to the disease may pale compared to what will happen here

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
20. I lost a lot of respect for you because of this OP
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:01 PM
Oct 2014

It's cruel, mean spirited and an attempt to blame the little person instead of the experts, the big wheels, the scientists, the boffins, the government.

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
27. Yep. The little person was sick. yet DU expects
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 10:32 PM
Oct 2014

100% rationality from someone developing a fever. At least she called for someone else's opinion. Too bad they blew it.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
33. She called several times and if this and other posts here are any indication of general national
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 01:35 AM
Oct 2014

slants on this it is despicable

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
47. I asked a fucking QUESTION. A fucking question. Where the fuck do you get
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 05:26 PM
Oct 2014

off accusing me of blaming the "little person" which BTW is condescending in reference to anyone let alone a nurse.

Response to snagglepuss (Original post)

Maru Kitteh

(28,313 posts)
34. learnt?
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 02:08 AM
Oct 2014

I'll patiently accept an explanation before I just express my first thoughts. Nurses ARE scientists. Please explain your post.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
46. Thank you for asking for clarification.
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 05:10 PM
Oct 2014

There seems to be two ways many react to experts, one is to accept their statements as god's word, only to be obeyed never questioned or thanks to the likes of Fox news to be ignored unless they support their worldview.

My question (please note not a statement) was to start a discussion as to why she didn't question authority. To start off such a discussion was to wonder aloud whether she shrugged off the dangers of ebola as simply hype.

Its puzzling because her calling the CDC meant that she wondered whether flying with a slight fever after treating an ebola patient might not be a good idea but when she got the go ahead from the CDC she set those qualms aside.




Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
35. Did she get ebola from flying on a plane?
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 02:53 AM
Oct 2014

I haven't heard anything about this, so I am totally in the dark about what is going on in this incident.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
37. Common sense seems to be severely lacking all the way around.
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 03:44 PM
Oct 2014

Maybe the nurse should have considered it wasn't a good idea to get on the plane with a low grade fever, KNOWING she might have ebola. I wouldn't have done it, no matter what the CDC told me.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
41. I too think it's more important to point fingers than to rationally discuss likely outcomes...
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 04:18 PM
Oct 2014

I too think it's more important to point fingers than to rationally discuss likely outcomes and solutions.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did the nurse with ebola ...