General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBoth infected nurses treated Duncan between Sept. 28 and Sept 30.
This was the period before Ebola had been confirmed in Duncan, but during the period in which he had violent vomiting and diarrhea. The period before the hospital used hazmat suits to treat him.
The important question is how many others treated him during that period? How many of the other 74 who treated him did so during that period? They seem to be the ones most at risk.
Medical records indicate that the workers wore protective equipment, including gowns, gloves and face shields during that time. The first mention in the records that they wore hazmat suits was on Sept. 30.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/texas-dept-2nd-person-tests-positive-ebola-26206324?page=2
KMOD
(7,906 posts)since those are the days that the nurse's union says protocols were not taken. It this is accurate, the incubation period until they showed symptoms was 16 days for Amber and 14 days for Nina. Not the said typical of 8-10 days. Nina's friend's have claimed that she had never cared for Duncan without a full hazmat suit. Nina also alledgedly cared for Duncan in his final days, when he would have been much more symptomatic. So I just assuming that Nina and Amber came into contact after he was isolated and critical, a few days later.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)It would make more since if they were infected around the time of his death.
That would likely lower the risk of additional infections, due to heightened precautions.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)particles, the longer the incubation period because it takes longer for the numbers to reach critical mass?
Which kind of fits. They would have had far less exposure (to numbers of particles) than Duncan did with his gallivanting around with the terminally ill woman. So he got very sick much quicker.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)was trying to provide care for a women in the latter stages of pregnancy. Maybe I missed something but since when is that 'gallivanting'?
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)or amusement:
From Google:
gal·li·vant
ˈɡaləˌvant/
verb
informal
gerund or present participle: gallivanting
go around from one place to another in the pursuit of pleasure or entertainment.
"she quit her job to go gallivanting around the globe"
*********************
Sorry to be such a pedantic noob, but the attacks on nurses have got me really fucking steamed.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Gallivanting... ...I can see this getting real ugly if it does start to spread not the disease as much as JQPUBLIC
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)I should hope that there was no way for them to infect another patient with Duncan's bodily fluids.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)AND if my theory is right, infection with just a few particles could have the longest incubation - 20 days. So those patients are NOT out of the woods.