Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,099 posts)
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:54 AM Oct 2014

2nd nurse's Ebola case may have been worse than thought

Frontier President Barry Biffle emailed employees Friday to tell them the nurse may have been at a more advanced stage of the illness than previously thought. He said the CDC has assured the Denver-based airline that crewmembers on the flights she took are at a very low risk of exposure.

The airline put the pilots and flight attendants on leave for 21 days, which health experts consider the outer limit of how long it would take someone exposed to Ebola to become sick. Biffle said passengers on the flights have also been notified.

Tim Husted, a traveler-services executive for Carlson Wagonlit Travel, a huge agency with offices around the world, said that fewer than 1 percent of the company's leisure travelers have changed a booking because of Ebola. There is even less of a reaction among business travelers, he said, although a few have requested routes that avoid Dallas.

Maryann Cook, a travel agent in New York, said that a Florida doctor who booked a $197,000 family safari trip to South Africa for 30 people next year wants to rebook it for 2016, even if it means losing a $60,000 deposit.


The complete article is at http://www.chron.com/news/texas/article/Ebola-causing-some-people-to-change-travel-plans-5830421.php .
73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2nd nurse's Ebola case may have been worse than thought (Original Post) TexasTowelie Oct 2014 OP
I wouldn't be surprised if we find out that she had vomiting and diarrhea kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #1
Oh, c'mon KMOD Oct 2014 #2
And fear-mongering brush Oct 2014 #48
Why, there is no reporting to back this up rufus dog Oct 2014 #3
Y'all have funny English here dumbcat Oct 2014 #64
Yeah, anyone want to be the next person in that airplane bathroom? Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #4
Please procede Warren! rufus dog Oct 2014 #5
Do you mean "proceed"? Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #6
Got me! rufus dog Oct 2014 #10
Gee, you seem awfully tense. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #13
not a bit testy rufus dog Oct 2014 #16
Warren, the CDC never said she was symptomatic KMOD Oct 2014 #17
Airline: CDC Warned 'Possibility' Ebola Nurse Had Symptoms on Plane Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #24
Warren, those warning are "may" KMOD Oct 2014 #27
And like I said, I think it's incredibly unlikely anyone on those planes will catch it. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #32
A low level of unnecessary risk for some horrific outcome, is still too high. KMOD Oct 2014 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #52
SHE WASN'T IN ISOLATION - NONE OF THEM WERE. Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #53
No. They gave specific symptoms. Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #59
They said she "felt funny" KMOD Oct 2014 #67
In addition to specific symptoms, they ALSO said she felt funny. Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #68
Fair enough, but KMOD Oct 2014 #72
This message was self-deleted by its author dpibel Oct 2014 #33
Because, dude, by misspelling it I was being a "smartas" Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #34
What the CDC has said Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #58
Warren is right Aerows Oct 2014 #9
Fucking Strawman rufus dog Oct 2014 #12
Do what you want to do Aerows Oct 2014 #20
Yes, you are right Aerows KMOD Oct 2014 #21
My body temperature fluctuates Aerows Oct 2014 #23
You are right, again Aerows KMOD Oct 2014 #25
I do Aerows Oct 2014 #29
:) n/t KMOD Oct 2014 #31
I don't understand where this is coming from KMOD Oct 2014 #7
Im not bashing the nurse. She consulted the CDC, the CDC fucked up. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #8
I have no idea what the CDC thinks they're doing KMOD Oct 2014 #11
She said she "felt funny" and she was running a fever of 99.5. davidn3600 Oct 2014 #18
Yes, I'm aware of that KMOD Oct 2014 #22
Humans don't all run 98.6 Aerows Oct 2014 #26
Yes, but fever isn't contagious with Ebola Aerows KMOD Oct 2014 #28
I understand that Aerows Oct 2014 #30
Fever is a symptom... FarPoint Oct 2014 #46
And 99.5 is assuming she hadn't taken a fever reducer B2G Oct 2014 #66
Kestrel has been quite hypocritical regarding the nurses Fumesucker Oct 2014 #14
Not sure where the confusion is Aerows Oct 2014 #35
I'm not confused about it Fumesucker Oct 2014 #37
Can't speak on that Aerows Oct 2014 #39
Hey, Fumesucker Aerows Oct 2014 #38
I get the impression Kestrel has some kind of problem with nurses Fumesucker Oct 2014 #40
I am under the same impression. City Lights Oct 2014 #49
Thank you for the links. uppityperson Oct 2014 #70
Folks are getting stigmatized Aerows Oct 2014 #15
OK rufus dog Oct 2014 #19
She wasn't. morningfog Oct 2014 #43
You just can't help yourself. City Lights Oct 2014 #47
I agree, sort of, here is a graphic of the symptom timeline using W.H.O info from BBC... HereSince1628 Oct 2014 #50
That comment is reprehensible, imo. You should give serious consideration KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #60
I would be. Because she's a nurse, and she would not willingly have exposed her family Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #61
How many cases are being tracked in the United States? 2? Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #41
Only 2 thus far. In_The_Wind Oct 2014 #42
Oh, that explains why 75 threads were started this week in the GD forum about ebola. Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #44
What else is new? In_The_Wind Oct 2014 #45
Yes, because no one can possibly think about two things at once. Sheldon Cooper Oct 2014 #51
The actual "cases" are not being "tracked". They are in Biocontainment Patient Care Units at kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #54
I would think test the woman, confirm negative, everyone goes on their way Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #56
I suspect that's what they will do. Her 21 days is up this weekend. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #62
Yeah, but her potential risk is so very, very low Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #63
It would be a mess for the record books, that's for sure. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #65
Can they tell by the viral load at the time of the test? B2G Oct 2014 #55
There's a definite implication based on results Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #57
I agree with you. LisaL Oct 2014 #69
They didn't seem to wait for the second test to announce it, Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #71
I think it's obvious Amber was symptomatic for days before she got on the plane to go back to Dallas LisaL Oct 2014 #73
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
1. I wouldn't be surprised if we find out that she had vomiting and diarrhea
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:55 AM
Oct 2014

from the time she left Dallas to go to Ohio and hid it from as many people as possible.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
2. Oh, c'mon
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:57 AM
Oct 2014

Nobody that had seen her has said she was sick. No vomiting, and no diarrhea. Enough with the nurse bashing.

brush

(53,764 posts)
48. And fear-mongering
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 07:39 AM
Oct 2014

Last edited Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:13 PM - Edit history (1)

And stop watching Fox and listening to right wing talk radio and repeating their crap.

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
3. Why, there is no reporting to back this up
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:00 AM
Oct 2014

So your claim is she was puking and shitting up a storm, but all others, including people who never met her before are stating she seemed fine?

For FUCKS SAKE!

dumbcat

(2,120 posts)
64. Y'all have funny English here
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:56 PM
Oct 2014

Since when is " I wouldn't be surprised if ..." considered "your claim..."?

Does DU have different English than other sites?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
4. Yeah, anyone want to be the next person in that airplane bathroom?
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:02 AM
Oct 2014

I dont like how they keep gradually admitting that this was worse and worse.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
13. Gee, you seem awfully tense.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:18 AM
Oct 2014

No need to get testy.

Well, hmm. The CDC now says she was "symptomatic" on at least one of the flights, but they haven't elaborated. Im asking if you'd want to be the next person in the can if she went in there and, say, dropped a torpedo into the harbor.

Guess what? I wouldn't. Does that make me a horrible person? You don't have to answer, it's a rhetoricle question.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
17. Warren, the CDC never said she was symptomatic
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:20 AM
Oct 2014

They simply inferred that she may have been ill earlier.

Nothing else has changed. If she wasn't in active illness, she was not contagious.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
24. Airline: CDC Warned 'Possibility' Ebola Nurse Had Symptoms on Plane
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:32 AM
Oct 2014
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ebola-virus-outbreak/airline-cdc-warned-possibility-ebola-nurse-had-symptoms-plane-n227046

I've said elsewhere, I think it's incredibly unlikely that anyone will get sick from her airport or other travels. Still, the whiff of CYA around some of this stuff is strong. They never should have greenlighted her to fly, certainly not AFTER Pham was diagnosed with ebola, like they did. Whoever came up with the idea that a potentially ebola-exposed individual was "fine" if their fever was 99.5 as opposed to 100.4, deserves to be fired.

I don't think it's surprising, or a coincidence, that the two people Duncan infected happened when his illness was far along, probably in the process of lifesaving heroic measures. I am definitely not interested in demonizing a health care worker who put her own life on the line for that guy. Ebola is most often transmitted when the prior patient is very sick, in the terminal stages of the illness... when the virus has begun converting the body, wholesale, into a puddle of trillions of copies of itself.

Each of those copies, of course, being incredibly infections, since ebola can be transmitted by a very small number of virons... which makes the new meme about how "ebola is ridiculously hard to catch" mind-boggling bullshit. It's easy to catch, if you happen to be unfortunate enough to be around the virus itself.

But demonizing or mocking people who might not want to share a bathroom or a plane aisle with someone the CDC has determined was "possibly symptomatic" with this thing... it's not cool.

And behind the overblown panic is the very real realization that this is a massively lethal, communicable pathogen, and one patient can cause a whole messload of havoc, even if our health systems can contain the secondary infections... witness the Patrick Sawyer situation in Nigeria, which was contained but only after 20+ more infections and some real nail-biting moments, particularly in Port Harcourt.

It's all the more reason why we should have suspended the travel visas for nationals of those 3 countries, until this is over, months ago, as Alan Grayson suggested. That would have prevented Duncan from coming to Texas in the first place.
 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
27. Warren, those warning are "may"
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:38 AM
Oct 2014

"may"

It's an absurd abundance of caution at this time. That's probably why people are freaking out.

The CDC was too nonchalant at first, and now they are too overly cautious.

But nothing has actually changed. You still need to be in contact with bodily fluids, especially those of a dying patient, to catch this.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
32. And like I said, I think it's incredibly unlikely anyone on those planes will catch it.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:51 AM
Oct 2014

Still, a low possibility is still a possibility. I'm glad they're going with the absurd abundance of caution, because it's clear (again, after months of bland assurances as to how ready the US was for this) that there was at least some measure of carelessness around this stuff at the beginning. That's how we ended up with 2 more cases, or how we ended up with Duncan being left in a public waiting area (on his second trip to the hospital) with other patients.

Do I think anyone will get sick from those airplanes? No.

Does that mean I would feel super-duper comfortable if I had sent a messy child who tends to touch everything, into that airplane bathroom right after this woman had taken a poop, as people on airplanes are sometimes wont to do?

No, I'd be pretty fucking upset. Which doesn't mean I think there was some high level of risk. A low level of unnecessary risk for some horrific outcome, is still too high.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
36. A low level of unnecessary risk for some horrific outcome, is still too high.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 04:02 AM
Oct 2014

Gotcha! Completely agree on that point.

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #24)

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
53. SHE WASN'T IN ISOLATION - NONE OF THEM WERE.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 10:03 AM
Oct 2014

They weren't told to avoid public spaces or transportation or removed from patient care until after Vinson was diagnosed. I think that change was made Thursday. Note that when it was made, the hospital then offered those potentially exposed workers rooms at the hospital because they were then terrified to remain at home with their family members, for obvious reasons.

Why do you keep retyping the same thing when you have been corrected for it before? Why do you feel that it is morally right to do what you are doing? Are you being paid to do this?

You have typed here almost the exact same thing you typed a day or two ago, and I corrected you then. Here's another article:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/10/15/cdc-officials-confirm-they-told-dallas-ebola-patient-it-was-ok-for-her-to-fly-even-with-low-grade-fever-report/

Your position is apparently to believe that CDC is lying when CDC has confirmed that she was cleared to fly. You should be ashamed of what you are doing.

Ms. Toad

(34,060 posts)
59. No. They gave specific symptoms.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:40 PM
Oct 2014

fatigue, malaise, and muscle aches - all early symptoms of Ebola. Those symptoms were present at least as early as Saturday. They were reviewing whether they were also present on Friday.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
67. They said she "felt funny"
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:09 PM
Oct 2014
http://www.wkyc.com/story/news/health/2014/10/17/summit-county-hosting-another-ebola-press-conference/17429709/

On Thursday, an official with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said it's possible Vinson, 29, was symptomatic as early as Friday, Oct. 10.

"She said she felt funny, but nothing specific," Dr. Christopher Braden of the CDC elaborated during Friday's press conference. He added, however, that Vinson "didn't have any of the typical symptoms of Ebola" at that time.

Ms. Toad

(34,060 posts)
68. In addition to specific symptoms, they ALSO said she felt funny.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:22 PM
Oct 2014
Yet a federal official with direct knowledge of the case gave different information to CNN's Elizabeth Cohen, relating that Vinson said she felt fatigue, muscle ache and malaise while she was in Ohio. She did not have diarrhea or vomiting while in that state or on the flight home.


http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/16/health/us-ebola/

While it doesn't identify the federal official - but CDC is the only entity I can think of that fits.
 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
72. Fair enough, but
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:50 PM
Oct 2014

I think I will go by what Dr. Braden of the CDC is stating, instead of Elizabeth Cohen's interpretation of a conversation she had with and unknown federal official.

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #13)

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
34. Because, dude, by misspelling it I was being a "smartas"
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:54 AM
Oct 2014

So, sue me. Usually I'm a more amicable chappie, but it's been a long-ass week.

But yes, that's WHY I italicized it. So perhaps your hubristic pouncing on my supposed hubris was prematuerre

Ms. Toad

(34,060 posts)
58. What the CDC has said
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:38 PM
Oct 2014

is that she was feeling fatigue, malaise, and muscle aches on Saturday, and possibly as early as Friday. All symptoms of Ebola (and a whole host of other viruses). Since she knows she was exposed to Ebola, knows the symptoms, and knows she was in the incubation period, she had no business flying. (Not to mention that 13% of Ebola patients do not run a fever.)

While I am skeptical that we know it all - since I have observed the same dribbling out of information already noted in this thread - I don't expect to learn anything as dramatic as symptoms exclusive to Ebola.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
9. Warren is right
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:13 AM
Oct 2014

Do *YOU* want to sit in the seat next to a person infected with Ebola?

Do *YOU* want to use the tiny airplane toilet after them?

I'm pretty sure your answer will be a resounding "No" so let's not pretend everyone is comfortable as hell with people with Ebola on planes and people with Ebola exposure on cruise ships.

Not trying to be an ass, just stating the obvious.

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
12. Fucking Strawman
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:16 AM
Oct 2014

The comment was that she was likely showing signs. All current reporting from witnesses state otherwise.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
20. Do what you want to do
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:21 AM
Oct 2014

I'll keep my opinions that you disagree with right out plain and center.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
21. Yes, you are right Aerows
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:22 AM
Oct 2014

that people would obviously be uncomfortable with that.

But it doesn't change the fact that she wasn't contagious at that point.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
23. My body temperature fluctuates
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:27 AM
Oct 2014

Basal body temperature, so that when I am in menses, my body goes up to 99.4. I have a *high* body temperature. I also have a high metabolism

Some folks have low body temperature. 97.1 is normal, but if they are ill the get to my *NORMAL* body temperature that has always been elevated, never mind when my hormones start flying.

Fever is not an adequate test. I understand that we also have nothing better until you are actually infected to the point where it is invading your organs, but hopefully we can develop a better test than freaking body temperature.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basal_body_temperature

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
25. You are right, again Aerows
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:34 AM
Oct 2014

Fever is not an adequate test for illness.

For Ebola however, I mean do you understand what happens to a critically ill Ebola patient. It's much more than a fever.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
29. I do
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:43 AM
Oct 2014

Forgive me if I would like to forego projectile vomiting and explosive diarrhea.

Never eat Sushi from a buffet where it has been sitting out. Never.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
7. I don't understand where this is coming from
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:11 AM
Oct 2014

And Kestrel, I think you add a lot to the conversations, but your nurse bashing is way out of line. Perhaps you want to insert the next catheter in the next Ebola patient and show us how easy it is?


Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
8. Im not bashing the nurse. She consulted the CDC, the CDC fucked up.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:13 AM
Oct 2014

But it sure seems like they've got the bad news on the slow release drip.

Someone fucked up. They originally said she was not sick on the last plane, then they admitted she may have been a little sick, now they're saying she was "symptomatic" but not elaborating and oh she may have been sick on the first plane, too.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
11. I have no idea what the CDC thinks they're doing
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:16 AM
Oct 2014

But everyone who saw her said she was not sick. She herself said she was not sick.

Abundance of caution? Who the hell knows now. But I'm betting that she did not infect anyone.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
22. Yes, I'm aware of that
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:24 AM
Oct 2014

that is not something to freak out over though. She was not endangering anyone at that point.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
26. Humans don't all run 98.6
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:36 AM
Oct 2014

I run around 99.2 because I have a high metabolism combined with exercise. We don't know. She might have had 2.2 degrees on temperature elevation and even though she felt ill, "rigorous standards" kicked in to say she was not in a risk category.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
30. I understand that
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:48 AM
Oct 2014

saliva, sweat, blood, urine, feces, vaginal liquids and semen contain virions (infectious material)

I'm not sure why people are pushing this meme that those who discuss the fever think a fever has anything to do with it other than being a symptom.

You are the second person stating that.

DUers aren't ignorant.

I'm certainly not that dumb, as this entire thread has demonstrated that I don't think fever is an adequate testing method.

FarPoint

(12,334 posts)
46. Fever is a symptom...
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 06:10 AM
Oct 2014

Not a conclusive or diagnostic test...just objective assessment data. A collection of symptoms can lead to a diagnosis.





 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
66. And 99.5 is assuming she hadn't taken a fever reducer
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:03 PM
Oct 2014

Quite likely if she was feeling off.

That's what concerns me. I think her fever would have registered higher had she not taken something and I can't believe she didn't.

I also think the amount of virus in her blood at the time of her test set off some alarm bells, possibly indicating it had progressed further than initially thought. I haven't heard anything about her condition the past few days.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
14. Kestrel has been quite hypocritical regarding the nurses
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:18 AM
Oct 2014

Here are two of Kestrel's posts only minutes apart..

In the first Kestrel is ripping nurse Vinson a new one for flying and in the second she is strongly defending the CDC for allowing Vinson to fly. The only difference is in the first post Kestrel didn't know Vinson had cleared her trip with authorities.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5671796

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5671923


 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
35. Not sure where the confusion is
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:56 AM
Oct 2014

Ms. Vinson didn't meet the criterion in body temperature to ground her.

The problem is that body temperatures vary widely. I'd barely be able to get on a plane if I was having my period (Basal body temperature).

Add in a high metabolism, and you are screwed under those parameters.

Body temperature doesn't catch it. She may have had a naturally low body temperature and didn't get detected before it was too late.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
37. I'm not confused about it
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 04:06 AM
Oct 2014

Your comment would be better aimed at Kestrel who was ripping the hell out of nurse Vinson for being a moron.

And then barely draws a breath before defending the CDC decision to let her fly.

A little later Kestrel's back to ripping the nurse again.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
39. Can't speak on that
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 04:10 AM
Oct 2014

Didn't see that thread. When I do, I'll comment.

I hate it when DUers gang up on someone because they don't one hundred percent agree with everyone.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
38. Hey, Fumesucker
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 04:08 AM
Oct 2014

I like you, but why is everyone harshing on Kestrel? She's pretty knowledgeable and sure, she can be a bit abrasive, but hell, I can be, too.

Did she do something that earned everyone's ire besides being forthright and maybe a little gritty about it?

She cares. She wouldn't be contributing to these threads if she didn't.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
40. I get the impression Kestrel has some kind of problem with nurses
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 04:18 AM
Oct 2014

She never backed off on her criticism of nurse Vinson while defending the CDC decision to let her fly.

I liked Kestrel up to this incident, she has shown a really authoritarian streak in this though. Harsh judgment on the nurse while strongly defending the CDC for exactly the same decision.

We either listen to experts or we listen to our Common Sense, we can't have it both ways because Common Sense is so often wrong about this sort of thing.

Which would you prefer we do?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
15. Folks are getting stigmatized
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 03:19 AM
Oct 2014

but damn, who wouldn't if you know they have been in the hot zone? I don't desire to die shitting, vomiting and not being able to have the antiemetic drugs and pain killers because it affects the internal organs too harshly. You have your explosive diarrhea, projectile vomiting, and you just pray you can get through it.

Ugly fucking way to go.

The good news is that you aren't disfigured like smallpox.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
50. I agree, sort of, here is a graphic of the symptom timeline using W.H.O info from BBC...
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 08:12 AM
Oct 2014

Not everyone follows the same timeline, and we folks outside her medical records can't know exactly what the course of her infection looked like.

There could be 2-3 few days of the generally flu-like symptoms, and those would be in addition to whatever low fever she monitored and reported before flying. That might be the 'being more symptomatic that thought.'

It's also true that the comment could mean that more distinctly ebola like symptoms were beginning to manifest. And, of course, we don't know what's in her medical records, but that might refer only to higher fever.

However her case proceeded, it's pretty clear her infection was skating at the border of the envelope of being symptomatic.

Because of that, I think I'd say, it wouldn't really -surprise- me if she was expressing symptoms typical of about day 10. If I were in a position of responsibility to flight crews and passengers or if I was trying to educate people who had possible exposures to the need for close monitoring for onset of symptoms of illness, that would actually concern me.


 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
60. That comment is reprehensible, imo. You should give serious consideration
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:42 PM
Oct 2014

to deleting, editing or otherwise apologizing for it.

Really beyond the pale.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
61. I would be. Because she's a nurse, and she would not willingly have exposed her family
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:52 PM
Oct 2014

Nor would she have called CDC and not reported those symptoms, nor, if she had reported gastro symptoms, would CDC have cleared the flight.

She is a nurse who got infected from a patient, not a mass murdering sociopath who got engaged and planned a wedding just to have a chance of passing it on.

It's more probable that she just had a slow immune response. It is the immune response that alerts the infected individual that something is wrong, and that varies quite naturally among individuals. Some people react to viral infections with stronger initial symptoms.

Also, in women of reproductive ages, there are natural modulations of the immune response that vary throughout the menstrual cycle. Certain types of immune responses are regulated down during the period during which a woman might get pregnant. This could account for milder initial symptoms:
http://www.livescience.com/36067-women-prone-infections-ovulating.html




Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
41. How many cases are being tracked in the United States? 2?
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 04:26 AM
Oct 2014

After Duncan died, have there been 2 more cases that are now being tracked?

I have been busy lately, and I haven't had much time to devote to this issue.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
44. Oh, that explains why 75 threads were started this week in the GD forum about ebola.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 05:33 AM
Oct 2014

I get it now.

Electing or re-electing Democrats to office with the mid-term elections less than 20 days away is less important to numerous DU members than discussing the hypothetical cases of non-existent ebola victims!!

Shit, looks like the "black is white, up is down" syndrome has overtaken the DU.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
54. The actual "cases" are not being "tracked". They are in Biocontainment Patient Care Units at
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:23 PM
Oct 2014

NIH and Emory.

A total of approximately 1000 contacts are being isolated/monitored/tracked to varying degrees. I don't know what they are going to do about the cruise ship with 3600+ people on it.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
56. I would think test the woman, confirm negative, everyone goes on their way
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:30 PM
Oct 2014

It's not like the cruise ship has the facilities to do it.

What shifted after the second nurse infections is that we went the Nigerian route. It's completely reasonable just to test to rule out and exclude. For really early cases testing wouldn't work, but that woman's theoretical exposure was almost three weeks ago.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
62. I suspect that's what they will do. Her 21 days is up this weekend.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:53 PM
Oct 2014

They really dodged a bullet with THAT business, though.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
63. Yeah, but her potential risk is so very, very low
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:55 PM
Oct 2014

But geeze, you're right. What a horror it would be if someone had Ebola on a cruise ship. How would one even handle it coming back to port?

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
55. Can they tell by the viral load at the time of the test?
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:26 PM
Oct 2014

I would think that would have given them a clue...

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
57. There's a definite implication based on results
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 01:37 PM
Oct 2014

If you have a really low load at time of diagnosis, the probability of passing it on through public transport is just about nil. Because of the way they reacted when Ms. Vinson was first tested, I suspect her viral load was higher, implying earlier illness with very low symptoms.

If you got in a car accident and a responder was exposed to body fluids, it could happen. But if the viral load is very low in your blood, how's it going to get out and attack the person just sitting next to you or standing next to you in line? It's a virus, not an alien from Mars. We don't know everything about this virus, but we know a lot about viruses.

It's not as if they had a flea infestation on that flight. I would think it's the bathroom or nothing, and even that's a low probability.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
69. I agree with you.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:23 PM
Oct 2014

And consider this. They said Nina's virus loads were low.
They said no such things about Amber.
I am pretty positive her viral loads were already high when she went to be tested.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
71. They didn't seem to wait for the second test to announce it,
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:34 PM
Oct 2014

which tends to confirm your suspicion. They moved very quickly.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
73. I think it's obvious Amber was symptomatic for days before she got on the plane to go back to Dallas
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:52 PM
Oct 2014

Which is why they are contacting hundreds of people who were on planes with her.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2nd nurse's Ebola case ma...