Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,950 posts)
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 03:14 AM Oct 2014

This might explain a lot: the Dallas Ebola hospital E.R. is run by an outside contractor.

Not by the hospital itself. No wonder their actions were so poorly coordinated. (And oriented to the bottom line.)

A recipe for disaster.

http://www.dallasnews.com/business/health-care/20141018-ebola-crisis-is-testing-presbyterian-hospital-dallas.ece

Presbyterian’s website says emergency department doctors are independent physicians — common language in hospitals, where the separate but interlocked interests of single doctors, physicians’ groups and the institution itself can be bewildering.

At Presbyterian’s ER, the rest of the story is even less known. The signs all say Presbyterian, but Presbyterian doesn’t run it. The entire department is outsourced to an independent contractor.

SNIP
In such arrangements, common nationwide, companies typically assume many duties for the hospital, including recruiting, scheduling, supervising and disciplining doctors and nurses. They also maintain electronic medical records, coding — the process of identifying the services rendered for billing purposes — and bill insurers and patients.

The arrangement means it is possible that the night the ER sent Duncan home with antibiotics and a wrong diagnosis of sinusitis, no Presbyterian employee was involved.

Emergency Medicine Consultants’ help-wanted ads indicate its doctors are independent contractors to the company, not the hospitals, and are then assigned by the company to ER shifts.

SNIP

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This might explain a lot: the Dallas Ebola hospital E.R. is run by an outside contractor. (Original Post) pnwmom Oct 2014 OP
Waste disposal Aerows Oct 2014 #1
Yes, it's been a huge problem already. n/t pnwmom Oct 2014 #2
Yes. Years ago, someone who was in a position to know a great deal about that issue JDPriestly Oct 2014 #6
Isn't it well known that organized crime is involved in waste disposal? pnwmom Oct 2014 #9
That is what I have heard. Of course, they might not be involved in the disposal of ebola JDPriestly Oct 2014 #13
Waste Management ( the corporation) was able to underpants Oct 2014 #32
WELL-KNOWN Aerows Oct 2014 #10
Ahem... ReRe Oct 2014 #16
Emory doesn't have an autoclave in house magical thyme Oct 2014 #23
Disposable doesn't matter. ReRe Oct 2014 #25
corrected: most hospitals no longer have the huge autoclaves needed for Ebola wastes. magical thyme Oct 2014 #29
Rodney Dangerfield - Back to School exboyfil Oct 2014 #27
Worldwide - see Somalia underpants Oct 2014 #33
Not if they burn down the hospital to collect the insurance. TexasTowelie Oct 2014 #8
This isn't whack-a-doodle-do 101 Aerows Oct 2014 #11
Here is some information on the disposal of Ebola-generated medical waste.... xocet Oct 2014 #14
Why can't the waste be incinerated? ColesCountyDem Oct 2014 #20
Autoclave. Avalux Oct 2014 #34
Let me ask the question a different way: ColesCountyDem Oct 2014 #39
Those 4 hospitals have autoclaves that can handle a large volume of waste. Avalux Oct 2014 #44
Wait a minute. I was referring to Dallas Presbyterian, not the 4 Level 4 hospitals. ColesCountyDem Oct 2014 #45
Specific to Dallas Presbyterian? Avalux Oct 2014 #46
Yes, that was what I was asking. ColesCountyDem Oct 2014 #47
Hmmm....let me ask you a question.... Avalux Oct 2014 #48
I'm well aware of what an autoclave is, for pity's sake! ColesCountyDem Oct 2014 #50
Because I know what I'm talking about. n/t Avalux Oct 2014 #52
Of course you do. ColesCountyDem Oct 2014 #53
Yet another round-about organizational form that permits owners to avoid responsibility JDPriestly Oct 2014 #3
How true! n/t xocet Oct 2014 #15
This won't stop Presby from being named in the upcoming lawsuits. n/t Liberal In Texas Oct 2014 #36
Ever heard of bankruptcy court? That's where these fly-by-night JDPriestly Oct 2014 #40
Good find Fumesucker Oct 2014 #4
+1. n/t pnwmom Oct 2014 #7
this is the problem with healthcare run as a business. redruddyred Oct 2014 #21
So often, problems are caused by contracted private companies Live and Learn Oct 2014 #5
The 9 most frightening words in the English language are... world wide wally Oct 2014 #12
You need to copyright that adage... ReRe Oct 2014 #17
There it is! The sacred profit motive makes anything possible! freshwest Oct 2014 #30
...line my pockets with taxpayer $$ Freddie Oct 2014 #31
The ER Doctors... ReRe Oct 2014 #18
The "green" team here DAMANgoldberg Oct 2014 #59
Looking at their website--Emergency Medicine Consultants-- mnhtnbb Oct 2014 #19
A big portion of the purpose of a corporation in the first place is avoiding responsibility Fumesucker Oct 2014 #22
Thanks for all the info. And yes, I made the change to the subject line that you suggested. pnwmom Oct 2014 #28
SN:FUBB eShirl Oct 2014 #24
second class healthcare system for profit. Lets see Mr. Duncans bill. Sunlei Oct 2014 #26
Kind of like FedEx insisting that its drivers aren't employees hatrack Oct 2014 #35
I shouldn't have been surprised but I was. Now I understand why so many people pnwmom Oct 2014 #38
FedEx does that to avoid withholding for social security, taxes, etc. mnhtnbb Oct 2014 #42
Well isn't that just a perfect storm of clusterfuck! AwakeAtLast Oct 2014 #37
k&r for visibility. nt Electric Monk Oct 2014 #41
The comments on your link are a real hoot Tweedy Oct 2014 #43
Kick... butterfly77 Oct 2014 #49
And the hospital itself can escape liability (maybe) for what the ER people did. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2014 #51
Amber Vinson just hired hotshot lawyer Billy Martin Fumesucker Oct 2014 #54
That could get complicated, legally. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2014 #56
The only way the truth of what was going on in Dallas is going to come out is through the courts Fumesucker Oct 2014 #57
Probably true - except that the corporate entities The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2014 #58
Capitalism, baby, got to love it! BTW, where are all the Libertarians now that KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #55

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
6. Yes. Years ago, someone who was in a position to know a great deal about that issue
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 03:34 AM
Oct 2014

told me that waste disposal in the US can be a very corrupt business. That's second-hand information, but that is what I have been told. The destruction of the waste and the cleaning of the hospital have to be overseen by some third party, ideally the government. Is that too much to ask in Texas -- even when Texans' lives are at stake?

pnwmom

(108,950 posts)
9. Isn't it well known that organized crime is involved in waste disposal?
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 03:36 AM
Oct 2014

Probably involved in hazardous waste as well.

That's a scary thought.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
13. That is what I have heard. Of course, they might not be involved in the disposal of ebola
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 04:04 AM
Oct 2014

waste. But it is Texas, so anything awful is possible. Sorry if that offends Texan Democrats. Obviously I'm not saying that about you. It's the Texas Republicans and right-wing independents who are the problem.

underpants

(182,545 posts)
32. Waste Management ( the corporation) was able to
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:33 AM
Oct 2014

Break into that market in the Northeast. Yes it was heavily controlled by organized crime - great way to clean money.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
16. Ahem...
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 04:49 AM
Oct 2014

... if that hospital (or any hospital for that matter) does not have at least one autoclave in house, it should be shut down immediately.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
23. Emory doesn't have an autoclave in house
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 07:17 AM
Oct 2014

Waste from Brantly and Writebol was a problem for them. They had to go to the neighboring CDC facility to borrow their autoclave so they could get rid of their waste.

Most hospitals don't have on-site autoclaves any more. Everything is disposable.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
25. Disposable doesn't matter.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 07:45 AM
Oct 2014

All specimens/contaminated articles, such as needles, etc., that go into those orange Hazmat bags, are supposed to be autoclaved before they are otherwise disposed of. I used to work in a medical laboratory and one of my duties was to keep the autoclave going. It was a stinky job, but somebody had to do it.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
29. corrected: most hospitals no longer have the huge autoclaves needed for Ebola wastes.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 08:06 AM
Oct 2014

(Reuters) - U.S. hospitals may be unprepared to safely dispose of the infectious waste generated by any Ebola virus disease patient to arrive unannounced in the country, potentially putting the wider community at risk, biosafety experts said.

Part of Emory's solution was to bring in one of the university's large-capacity sterilizers called an autoclave, which uses pressurized steam to neutralize infectious agents, before handing the waste off to its disposal contractor for incineration.

Few hospitals have the ability to autoclave medical waste from Ebola patients on site.

Dr. Gavin Macgregor-Skinner, an expert on public health preparedness at Pennsylvania State University, said there's "no way in the world" that U.S. hospitals are ready to treat patients with highly infectious diseases like Ebola.

"Where they come undone every time is the management of their liquid and solid waste," said Macgregor-Skinner, who recently trained healthcare workers in Nigeria on behalf of the Elizabeth R. Griffin Research Foundation.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/24/health-ebola-usa-hospitals-idUSL2N0RP00E20140924



exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
27. Rodney Dangerfield - Back to School
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 07:52 AM
Oct 2014

Thornton Melon: First of all you're going to have to grease the local politicians for the sudden zoning problems that always come up. Then there's the kickbacks to the carpenters, and if you plan on using any cement in this building I'm sure the teamsters would like to have a little chat with ya, and that'll cost ya. Oh and don't forget a little something for the building inspectors. Then there's long term costs such as waste disposal. I don't know if you're familiar with who runs that business but I assure you it's not the boy scouts.

underpants

(182,545 posts)
33. Worldwide - see Somalia
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:38 AM
Oct 2014

A lot of medical waste from Asia was dumped off the Somalia coast after it's government collapsed.

TexasTowelie

(111,829 posts)
8. Not if they burn down the hospital to collect the insurance.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 03:35 AM
Oct 2014

Okay, that is a speculative conspiracy theory. However, if something of that nature occurs I wouldn't want to be an employee of the state fire marshall's office sifting through the evidence.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
11. This isn't whack-a-doodle-do 101
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 03:44 AM
Oct 2014

It's pretty well known among business owners that waste disposal is a corrupt industry. They will charge you for an industrial container that gets defaced by no fault of your own, not pickup the trash on the scheduled day, and attempt to double bill you.

Not all are like that, but MANY are, and while the plural of anecdote does not equal data, it's obvious enough that it has been noted by MANY in their communities.

xocet

(3,871 posts)
14. Here is some information on the disposal of Ebola-generated medical waste....
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 04:12 AM
Oct 2014
Oct. 17, 2014 2:44 PM ET
Koster aims to ban Ebola waste at St. Louis center

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster is seeking to block a sterilization company from handling any medical waste contaminated with Ebola at its St. Louis facility.

Koster said Friday he has asked a St. Louis Circuit judge to grant a temporary restraining order against Stericycle Inc. He says treating waste potentially infected with Ebola poses a threat to workers.

Calls from The Associated Press to Stericycle were not immediately returned Friday.

Stericycle received a federal permit earlier this month to remove waste from the Texas hospital and home where a man with Ebola virus stayed before dying.

...

http://hosted2.ap.org/MOSED/94cae84c359d4d878363bb29ca5cdc01/Article_2014-10-17-MO--Missouri-Ebola%20Disposal/id-0bef69af571148889c603d534e5bb351


Oct. 17, 2014 6:30 PM ET
St. Louis site won't handle Ebola-infected waste

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — A sterilization company on Friday agreed not to treat any waste potentially infected with Ebola at a St. Louis facility after the state attorney general sought a temporary restraining order, alleging that the company had previously violated waste-management laws.

A St. Louis Circuit Court approved the deal between Stericycle Inc. and Attorney General Chris Koster's office. Earlier Friday, Gov. Jay Nixon announced that the state now can test for suspected cases of the virus in a Jefferson City lab.

Illinois-based Stericycle received a federal permit earlier this month to remove waste from the Texas hospital and home where a man with Ebola stayed before he died.

In his filing seeking the temporary restraining order, Koster said that treating potentially infected waste would pose a threat to workers. The company previously violated waste-management laws by failing to properly test and operate its equipment or track infectious materials, the filing said.

...

http://hosted2.ap.org/MOSED/94cae84c359d4d878363bb29ca5cdc01/Article_2014-10-17-MO--Nixon-Ebola/id-821712d1c7d44f54bff587680a3af122

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
34. Autoclave.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:58 AM
Oct 2014

There are only four facilities in this country that are fully equipped to handle patients with an RG4 infectious disease....they autoclave EVERYTHING that comes in contact with the patient.

Ebola such a messy disease, and clean up amasses a lot of waste material. All of it goes in the autoclave, and is then disposed of as normal biohazard waste. This takes a tremendous amount of resources and manpower and as a result, these facilities can only handle a patient or two at a time. Combined, there are only 8 beds TOTAL in the entire country. Emory has a 2 bed capacity, I believe.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
39. Let me ask the question a different way:
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 01:51 PM
Oct 2014

Since an incinerator burns at a higher temperature than an autoclave sterilizes the used sheets, bandages, 'sharps', etc., is it not in fact safer to incinerate the medical waste locally, than truck it somewhere distant to be autoclaved and then placed in a landfill?

I do know that Mr. Nelson was cremated, upon recommendation of the CDC, citing safety concerns about any other method of disposing of his remains. Logically, shouldn't the same be true for medical waste?

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
44. Those 4 hospitals have autoclaves that can handle a large volume of waste.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 07:31 PM
Oct 2014

So there's no transporting infectious materials anywhere. Incineration works, but most hospitals don't have the means to incinerate, so they have to transport the waste to do it. Transporting is dangerous for obvious reasons.

That's why there are only 4 hospitals in the country who can handle the disposal of Ebola contaminated waste on site. These chose autoclaving because:

1. not toxic (incineration releases dioxins and furans into the atmosphere)
2. easier to operate
3. less cost to operate (no fuel needed)

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
45. Wait a minute. I was referring to Dallas Presbyterian, not the 4 Level 4 hospitals.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 08:07 PM
Oct 2014

That's the hospital referenced in the OP.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
47. Yes, that was what I was asking.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 08:18 PM
Oct 2014

I knew disposal of their waste was an issue, which is why I asked if it wasn't safer to simply incinerate it. Some how, our messages got off track. I think we're back on the same page now.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
48. Hmmm....let me ask you a question....
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:16 PM
Oct 2014

"safer to simply incinerate it" - as compared to what? That's what I thought you were asking; if incineration was safer than autoclave. No it's not, they both use high heat; autoclave is wet.

Incineration certainly isn't simpler, especially when the waste has to be driven somewhere to do it.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
50. I'm well aware of what an autoclave is, for pity's sake!
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 10:53 PM
Oct 2014

It's safer to incinerate the medical waste nearby, or (likely) in the hospital itself, than to transport it far away to be autoclaved. Furthermore, the heat generated by an autoclave is far less than that generated by an incinerator, and an incinerator reduces the medical waste to ash, blobs of sterile glass and sterile metal.

I don't understand why you're so rah-rah about autoclaving the medical waste, rather than incinerating it.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
53. Of course you do.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:16 PM
Oct 2014

The rest of us are just blithering idiots with no understanding of heat, pathogens, the danger of transporting hazardous material long distances, etc. .

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
3. Yet another round-about organizational form that permits owners to avoid responsibility
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 03:31 AM
Oct 2014

to employees and the public. Ugghh. We need to prohibit these practices. Lines of ownership and responsibility should be clear -- to the owners -- to the employees -- to the public -- and to the government.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
40. Ever heard of bankruptcy court? That's where these fly-by-night
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 01:53 PM
Oct 2014

very small private contractors go when they die. It's called no liability heaven. The whole point in forming these small companies and farming out the hazardous work to them . . . . .

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
4. Good find
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 03:32 AM
Oct 2014

And yes, I think it does explain a lot.

Very unlikely to hear anything about this on cable news.

Systems optimized for efficiency of one sort lose robustness in other measures. Dallas Presbyterian's ER is optimized to most efficiently extract money from the patients which means that all other considerations take a back seat to that.

 

redruddyred

(1,615 posts)
21. this is the problem with healthcare run as a business.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 06:42 AM
Oct 2014

...namely, that it's run as a business.

I don't get cable tv, but if they're pushing the panicmongering as hard as I hear they are, let's hope something good comes out of it.

eg more and better health care reform.

world wide wally

(21,733 posts)
12. The 9 most frightening words in the English language are...
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 03:56 AM
Oct 2014

I'm from a corporation, and I'm here to help.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
17. You need to copyright that adage...
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 04:57 AM
Oct 2014

... unless you seen it somewhere else. And unlike Ronnie's statement, it is a fact. The
Corporation is what can't be trusted in this world. Self regulation? What a fucking joke.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
18. The ER Doctors...
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 05:09 AM
Oct 2014

... are private contractors? Wonder how much of the rest of the hospital services were contracted out? "Presbyterian Privatized Hospital" might be the proper sign for the top of the building, in flashing neon.

DAMANgoldberg

(1,278 posts)
59. The "green" team here
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:41 PM
Oct 2014

Carolinas Medical Center & Carolinas Mercy Hospital have privatized ER services. I have not been to the "purple" team (Novant Presbyterian) so I can't speak to them.

mnhtnbb

(31,365 posts)
19. Looking at their website--Emergency Medicine Consultants--
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 05:46 AM
Oct 2014

it indicates they provide ER docs, Physician Assistants, and Nurse Practitioners. That wouldn't include
any other nursing staff--which would be provided by the hospital--and from experience I can tell
you the Nursing Administration would fight hard--VERY hard--to control the nurse staffing of any
and all departments--including ER--in the hospital. Just because the website says they recruit
Nurse Practitioners, doesn't mean the Nursing Administration at Texas Presbyterian agreed to that.
There could also be a war going on between PA's--provided by Emergency Medicine Consultants--
and Nurse Practitioners if they are both providing services in that ER.

This might explain the early brouhaha about the communication between the ER doc and RN who
saw Mr. Duncan the first time. It's very possible there is a turf war going on in that ER.

The arrangement itself--of contracting ER doc services--is not that unusual for a community hospital.
For a hospital the size of Texas Presbyterian, it is kind of surprising. On the other hand, it's Texas
and I'll wager that a lot of the docs there are still fiercely independent (Republican, too) and not
going to commit to a relationship where they become employees.

http://emdocs.com/our_company


I would also suggest you edit your OP to indicate that the Emergency Department at Texas Presbyterian
is staffed by docs managed through an outside contractor. There is no indication--anywhere--in the article
you cited that the entire hospital is managed by an outside contractor. There really is no answer, either,
to the question of whether any nurse practitioners hired by the outside contractor are assigned to that ER.
One place to look for that answer would be to see if Texas Presbyterian has any open RN or LVN or aide
positions for the ER.


On edit: I just went on the Texas Presbyterian Hospital website--careers--entered RN all department
any category (FT, PT, etc) any shift and it did come up with a listing for an RN FT days for
the Emergency Department. When I clicked it, it indicated it was no longer active. If they had an opening,
with the decline in volume from the Ebola story, they've probably pulled the position. But it does
give credence to the possibility that only the ER docs are provided by an outside contractor, and that, in itself,
is really not all that unusual. But the onus, then, is on the contractor for that doc that night discharging
Mr. Duncan home with an Rx for antibiotics. The hospital can't contract away its ultimate responsibility,
but it does reinforce the need for better management and oversight of the ER docs.


Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
22. A big portion of the purpose of a corporation in the first place is avoiding responsibility
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 06:53 AM
Oct 2014

And avoiding responsibility has a lot to do with subcontracting services too.

This will be tied up in the courts for a long time just trying to determine who is responsible for what. The lawyers will be ecstatic even if no one else is happy.

pnwmom

(108,950 posts)
28. Thanks for all the info. And yes, I made the change to the subject line that you suggested.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 08:01 AM
Oct 2014


It also made me think about some sub-standard care I received in an urgent care center that is supposedly connected to the larger hospital where I go. I went for treatment for a UTI, and the doc told me he was going to order a urine culture and then failed to do it. When I called up for the non-existent results, the nurse indicated he wasn't a regular employee. Now the screw-up makes more sense.

But he did write that prescription for antibiotics, so I had it to take anyway.

hatrack

(59,553 posts)
35. Kind of like FedEx insisting that its drivers aren't employees
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 10:24 AM
Oct 2014
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-10-16/fedex-ground-says-its-drivers-arent-employees-dot-the-courts-will-decide

This should surprise absolutely no one. Public health? Training? Fuck that - if it doesn't help our bottom line, we don't do it.

pnwmom

(108,950 posts)
38. I shouldn't have been surprised but I was. Now I understand why so many people
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 01:39 PM
Oct 2014

find out their insurance doesn't work in the E.R.

mnhtnbb

(31,365 posts)
42. FedEx does that to avoid withholding for social security, taxes, etc.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 03:12 PM
Oct 2014

That's not the rationale in the hospital setting with docs, and the hospital still has an obligation
to provide documentation of appropriate certification, training, continuing education, etc. of the docs
staffing the ER in order to meet accreditation standards--which have to be met for reimbursement. It's not an end run
for any of that.

AwakeAtLast

(14,120 posts)
37. Well isn't that just a perfect storm of clusterfuck!
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 12:43 PM
Oct 2014

You can quote me on that, BTW.

Basically, it's the fast-food equivalent to health care. Ugh.

Tweedy

(628 posts)
43. The comments on your link are a real hoot
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 07:06 PM
Oct 2014

Apparently, a lot of state's rights people have no clue what state's rights mean. Many seem to think the federal government controls state hospitals. Remember a short time back when so many were screaming keep the Feds out of health care? How quickly they forget.

Yet, my heart goes out to the beautiful city of Dallas and all of those who have been so tragically hurt by the mistakes made at that hospital.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,520 posts)
56. That could get complicated, legally.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:25 PM
Oct 2014

If she gets workers' compensation she can't sue her employer (whether that's the hospital or whatever contractor she works for). But there are other people or entities who might be at fault - maybe even the CDC, but there are issues of sovereign immunity and all the hoops you have to jump through to satisfy the Federal Tort Claims Act. No wonder she hired some big-shot lawyer; she'll need one.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,520 posts)
58. Probably true - except that the corporate entities
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:39 PM
Oct 2014

probably will have a significant motivation to settle - with a confidential settlement agreement, of course.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
55. Capitalism, baby, got to love it! BTW, where are all the Libertarians now that
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:24 PM
Oct 2014

Ebola has appeared inside the U.S.? I haven't heard one peep out of any of those retards lately on Facebook or here.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This might explain a lot:...