Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 03:32 AM Oct 2014

Unpaid Interns at Gawker Unite for a Class-Action Lawsuit Under Fair Labor Standards Act

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/26579-unpaid-interns-at-gawker-unite-for-a-class-action-lawsuit-under-fair-labor-standards-ac

Unpaid interns for the website Gawker.com have won a round in court in their attempt to bring a class-action suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

A federal judge has ruled that lawyers bringing the suit can send notices to unpaid interns throughout the company who could potentially join the lawsuit.

The judge did not decide on the interns’ claims, but did rule they had sufficiently common characteristics to be certified as a class.

The court ruled the interns performed work similar to that of paid employees, contributed content to Gawker’s publications, moderated sections of its websites and received primarily on-the-job training. They had to follow Gawker’s general policies, were supervised in the same way as employees and received communications from management in the same way employees did. They also used the same internal communications systems employees did, were expected to work independently and received no special training or instruction.

In other words, the company treated the interns just like employees in all ways except one—they weren’t paid.

Note: Suing on behalf of unpaid interns is the hottest trend in employment law. Don’t be a victim! Discuss your internships with your attorney so they can be structured in a legal way. Simply using interns to supplement your workforce will land you in court.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Unpaid Interns at Gawker Unite for a Class-Action Lawsuit Under Fair Labor Standards Act (Original Post) eridani Oct 2014 OP
Gawker and its media affiliates are all that is wrong with the internet. joshcryer Oct 2014 #1
errr bmac19gg Oct 2014 #2
Uhh...is that a rhetorical question? spooky3 Oct 2014 #3
good suggestion bmac19gg Oct 2014 #6
Sorry about your bad experience (though I can't agree about the bricks!) spooky3 Oct 2014 #7
They did not agree to work for free........... mrmpa Oct 2014 #4
You cannot "agree" to an illegal labor contract Recursion Oct 2014 #8
K&R nt riderinthestorm Oct 2014 #5
Why has this thread gained no traction? Are we not pro labor? riderinthestorm Oct 2014 #9

spooky3

(34,425 posts)
3. Uhh...is that a rhetorical question?
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 05:27 AM
Oct 2014

If yes, you may have taken a wrong turn. Why would you support illegal exploitation of workers due to their need for a job?

If no, why don't you read the article and the internship cases under the FLSA? Can promises not be met or work conditions change after you begin work?

 

bmac19gg

(96 posts)
6. good suggestion
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 05:29 PM
Oct 2014

So I went to the Department of Labors page to find out and read the section called "The Test For Unpaid Interns", it has six criteria.

1. The internship, even though it includes actual operation of the facilities of the employer, is similar to training which would be given in an educational environment;

2. The internship experience is for the benefit of the intern;

3. The intern does not displace regular employees, but works under close supervision of existing staff;

4. The employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern; and on occasion its operations may actually be impeded;

5. The intern is not necessarily entitled to a job at the conclusion of the internship; and

6. The employer and the intern understand that the intern is not entitled to wages for the time spent in the internship.


Looks like Gawker says they were met, the plaintiffs say otherwise, and a judge found enough merit to move forward with the case. It will be interesting to watch how this plays out.

And no I don't support worker exploitation because I've been a victim of it before. A former employer withheld 6 paychecks of mine by telling me there was no money all along paying himself then filed for bankruptcy and the courts, and both state/federal DOL let him get away with it. So my personal opinion is that employers who steal from employees should have their heads caved in with bricks.

spooky3

(34,425 posts)
7. Sorry about your bad experience (though I can't agree about the bricks!)
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 09:01 PM
Oct 2014

and glad you took the time to look at the criteria.

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
4. They did not agree to work for free...........
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 06:16 AM
Oct 2014

they agreed to intern (to be taught & to learn). The assumption(s) by many of these companies is that they were getting employees for a short time, the companies did not learn what their responsibilities were.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
8. You cannot "agree" to an illegal labor contract
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 10:08 PM
Oct 2014

Regardless of your opinion of the matter, if you did work for Gawker you are owed at least minimum wage for that. If you want to then give that money back to Gawker, you can.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
9. Why has this thread gained no traction? Are we not pro labor?
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 10:23 PM
Oct 2014

Its crazy this issue hasn't gotten 300 recs and a shitload of kicks...


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Unpaid Interns at Gawker ...