Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere's the recent OP, "How Democrats blew a 38% electoral advantage on Social Security."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=thread&address=10021857&info=1#editsIt shows up as the original edit version of this thread from 2011:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021857
There was a software glitch affecting about 250 threads in General Discussion
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10134339
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10134339
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1309 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's the recent OP, "How Democrats blew a 38% electoral advantage on Social Security." (Original Post)
woo me with science
Oct 2014
OP
The politicians at the national level don't hang with anyone who needs SS to survive
Fumesucker
Oct 2014
#4
msongs
(67,387 posts)1. "everything is on the table" is not so comforting for seniors on SS nt
pa28
(6,145 posts)2. I think it's gone for good.
Thanks anyway.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)3. The story is on Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/democrats-social-security_b_6071482.html
"Some things in life are self-evident. Fire burns, supply side economics doesn't work, and no Democrat, ever, under any circumstances, no matter what, should even think about offering to cut one solitary cent from Social Security, through partial privatization or means testing or raising the retirement age.
Why so many Democrats seem to have to relearn the latter lesson each and every election cycle, is really, truly, mind-boggling. Yes, I know Wall Street, in a way it once wasn't, has become an important source of funding for Democrats. But there are simply some obvious truths candidates (and Wall Street funders) need to come to grips with, and one of them is stay away from Social Security -- unless you're increasing it.
During these final weeks, we have seen this clearly come into focus in a way it hasn't since Third Way wrote a silly Wall Street Journal op-ed and destroyed the leading Democratic candidate to become Pennsylvania governor with the inevitable backlash (she was an honorary co-chair). Fingers on the pulse of the people, these guys possess not. "
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)4. The politicians at the national level don't hang with anyone who needs SS to survive
The only people they hear from personally want to get their hands on all that beautiful cash that the 99% will just foolishly waste on things like food, shelter and medical care.