General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Surgeon General - what I didn't know.
I thought that the Surgeon General was more or less a spokeperson. I still recall the big story when the Surgeon General announced that smoking tobacco will likely kill you.
What I didn't know was that the Surgeon General is in charge of a group of public health professionals who are available to assist during public health crises and a reserve group ready to be deployed in the event of a health emergency.
http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/about/duties/index.html
In other words, if we had a Surgeon General, we wouldn't need an Ebola Czar.
I would also say this - my impression is that the CDC provides the science, and the Surgeon General implements it.
"
Opinion: The Truly Ridiculous Reason the U.S. Has No Surgeon General"
This last fact is important today because of the inexcusable circumstances that led to the United States having no surgeon general in place to calm the recent national hysteria about Ebola. In a move that may well be unprecedented, Senate Republicans and assorted Democratic lickspittles have blocked President Barack Obamas selection for surgeon generalno, not a judgeship or a Cabinet position or an appointment that involves actual governmental powerbecause the nominee, Dr. Vivek Murthy, made a statement mildly critical of guns."
http://www.newsweek.com/2014/11/07/opinion-warning-tweeting-about-guns-can-keep-you-out-public-service-280804.html
unblock
(52,129 posts)hlthe2b
(102,150 posts)attachment to major health agencies, especially CDC and NIH. All that is ongoing with or without a SG, but I do believe the office should have been filled long ago.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)it's hard to fight an epidemic when you're busy hiring people to answer the phones. Bureaucracies don't function well when people can't follow procedure. (and I use the term bureaucracy in a good way here - a group of people organized to respond quickly to various events.)
hlthe2b
(102,150 posts)they aren't sitting on their thumbs trying to answer phones.
The CDC teams deployed for immediate response here and overseas are EIS (Epidemic Intelligence Service Officers) and most of them are Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. That you don't know about them actually speaks to how well they've done their job over the past 50 plus years. http://www.cdc.gov/eis/
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)I have been supporting the CDC since day one, and have been angered at how many here have jumped all over the CDC as an example of government incompetence.
hlthe2b
(102,150 posts)hedgehog
(36,286 posts)but decided it wouldn't be proper to edit something in current discussion.
I've never seen so many replies so fast - Ebola is a very hot topic.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)...to treat foreign health care workers.
http://www.examiner.com/article/american-military-buildup-continues-ebola-stricken-liberia
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)hedgehog
(36,286 posts)to denounce the Republican blockade in a way that gets people's attention.
hlthe2b
(102,150 posts)branford
(4,462 posts)and his resume is quite impressive. Arguably, he's more qualified than Obama's nominee, Vivek Murthy.
http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/about/biographies/biosg.html
Moreover, there are many highly qualified individuals who could easily be confirmed by the Senate for SG. Vivek Murthy has no right or entitlement to the position, and as he has no specific or unique skills concerning Ebola or epidemics, sny claim that we desperately need Mr. Murthy specifically is, at best, a red herring.
Most importantly, Mr. Murthy has not received a vote in the Senate because about 10 Democrats will not support his nomination. There are 55 Democrats (including 2 Independents in the caucus), and he needs only 50 votes to be confirmed (a tie would be broken by the vice-president). After Reid's "nuclear option," the Republicans cannot filibuster executive appointments.
If you have any complaints that Mr. Murthy has not been confirmed, you need to speak with Harry Reid.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/15/us/senate-balks-at-obama-pick-for-surgeon-general.html
hlthe2b
(102,150 posts)in reality those who are temporarily acting more often than not aare mere placeholders. They don't initiate new policy or forge new direction, but merely "hold the course" to the extent possible.
branford
(4,462 posts)we can easily find and confirm a highly qualified SG with experience with epidemics. There's nothing special about Mr. Murthy, and if we need a SG so desperately to fight Ebola, he is an impediment.
Mr. Murthy's lack of confirmation is also due to our party, although the Republicans are certainly benefiting from our discomfort and lack of unity.