Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama support ‘sinks’ ahead of midterms? Maybe not
Posted with permission.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/obama-support-sinks-ahead-midterms-maybe-not#break
Obama support sinks ahead of midterms? Maybe not
10/31/14 01:09 PM
By Steve Benen
The headline on The Hills homepage yesterday read, Obamas approval dips ahead of midterms. As Eric Boehlert noted, theres a lot of this kind of reporting going around.
The news media reminders arrive almost daily now: President Obamas approval rating is low and going lower. McClatchy Newspapers highlighted the dropping approval ratings, while the Washington Post declared President Obamas approval ratings have plunged to record lows. The Christian Science Monitor noted the numbers have plummeted. The Washington Examiner stressed the presidents approvals were sinking to historic lows, while an Atlantic headlined announced, Obamas Sinking Approval Could Drag Democrats Down With Him.
The portrait being painted by an array of media artists is unmistakable: Obamas approval ratings are not only weak but theyre going down, down, down.
But its not true.
The portrait being painted by an array of media artists is unmistakable: Obamas approval ratings are not only weak but theyre going down, down, down.
But its not true.
Its obviously beyond dispute that President Obamas support is nowhere near its heights from 2009, but the perception of Obama in freefall just isnt correct. The most recent Pew Research Center poll showed the presidents approval rating inching higher. So did the latest Fox News poll. The latest Washington Post/ABC poll showed the presidents approval rating up three points. The most recent CNN poll released earlier this week found Obamas approval rating reaching its highest point of the year.
The new Gallup tracking poll results havent been published just yet, but yesterday, the president had a 43% approval rating. At the start of the year, it was 42%.
By no fair definition would anyone characterize Obama as popular, but the data clearly doesnt support the plunged to record lows talk.
So why do we hear it quite so often? I suspect is has something to do with attempts to make sense of the 2014 midterms Republicans are running a hyper-aggressive anti-Obama campaign, predicated on the assumption that voters whove turned against the president will also turn against candidates from the presidents party.
Indeed, theres already been amble Beltway chatter about how much responsibility Obama should shoulder for the Democrats midterm difficulties. The answer is, not much.
In fact, Brian Beutler explained that several key Dems are already outperforming the president in their respective states.
If I had to, Id put money on Democrats losing {Senate races in Georgia, Kansas, and Kentucky}. But you have to be really invested in a certain conception of politics to explain races that close in states that red as evidence of a national anti-Obama wave. Or to attribute their losses to insufficient Obama bashing.
If roles, parties, and states were reversed, and Democrats were barely hanging on to Senate seats in (for instance) California, Washington, and Connecticut, the obvious story wouldnt be that Republicans were compounding their disadvantages. It would be that Republicans were outperforming fundamentals in Democratic strongholds. If those Republicans went on to lose anyhow, it wouldnt support the view that their strategies were flawed, or executed poorly. It would rather suggest that even a good, well executed campaign strategy usually cant overwhelm the basic nature of the electorate.
If roles, parties, and states were reversed, and Democrats were barely hanging on to Senate seats in (for instance) California, Washington, and Connecticut, the obvious story wouldnt be that Republicans were compounding their disadvantages. It would be that Republicans were outperforming fundamentals in Democratic strongholds. If those Republicans went on to lose anyhow, it wouldnt support the view that their strategies were flawed, or executed poorly. It would rather suggest that even a good, well executed campaign strategy usually cant overwhelm the basic nature of the electorate.
Obviously, if the president were riding high in the polls, wed see a very different midterm dynamic. But despite the chatter, the picture of a president with plummeting support, making it impossible for Democrats to compete, isnt an accurate one.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 560 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama support ‘sinks’ ahead of midterms? Maybe not (Original Post)
babylonsister
Oct 2014
OP
FSogol
(45,471 posts)1. K&R. Great article. Thanks for posting. n/t