Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jennied

(553 posts)
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:26 AM Nov 2014

Just wondering about something about doctor assisted suicide...

With Brittany Maynard being in the news recently, about how she took her own life because she had brain cancer, I was wondering what exactly the doctor gives patients for them to pass away. The reason why I ask is could the same thing be given to people that they're going to execute in prison?

First, I'm against the death penalty 100%, but with these "cocktails" that have been concocted a few times, that leave people gasping and choking - I was wondering why they couldn't just give the people on deathrow whatever the doctor gave Brittany Maynard? I don't want them to die - but if they have to do it, then it should at least not be inhumane.

I'm not up to date with any of the news on these subjects really - so maybe I'm missing something - but if someone could give me a reason why. I vaguely remember something about the company that used to make the "poison" for prisoners not making it anymore? (I probably have it backwards.) So what did the doctor use for Brittany? And why can't it be used for prisoners during execution?

Ugh, this topic disturbs me, but I've been thinking about it. Thanks.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just wondering about something about doctor assisted suicide... (Original Post) jennied Nov 2014 OP
That was my first thought too! Some have felt other alternatives are used because they cause RKP5637 Nov 2014 #1
Interesting question. djean111 Nov 2014 #2
The manufacturers of the drugs won't allow for their use in executions is my guess. n/t demmiblue Nov 2014 #3
MDs can't do it as safeinOhio Nov 2014 #4
Correct. Bluenorthwest Nov 2014 #5
Yes I read the same thing vankuria Nov 2014 #6
If the inmate refused to take the drugs KinMd Nov 2014 #7
Maybe it has to do with the method of delivery?? YarnAddict Nov 2014 #8
Another question B2G Nov 2014 #9
Actually if the patient is in a vegetative stare, it's not cruel KinMd Nov 2014 #10
And if they're not? B2G Nov 2014 #11
I agree totally , but often the law allows you to withold water and food KinMd Nov 2014 #12

RKP5637

(67,084 posts)
1. That was my first thought too! Some have felt other alternatives are used because they cause
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:30 AM
Nov 2014

pain and suffering, they want no easy way out for the convicted. I think there is a lot of truth in that, they want vengeance, hence better more humane execution methods are not employed.

Same here, "Ugh, this topic disturbs me, but I've been thinking about it."

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
2. Interesting question.
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:38 AM
Nov 2014

Maybe dying horribly is reserved for criminals and - sadly - some people think Brittany Maynard was cowardly and not following some god's will in choosing to die painlessly, not in agony.
Some responses I have read about the subject have steeled my resolve to, if I happen to get something terminal, off myself at home by whatever means I can, rather than leave my passing up to anyone with some personal agenda who thinks dying in agony is the bestest bravest thing to do. I understand that total fucking strangers believe they can make that decision for others. And will try to do just that. Bizarre.
Not to mention the irony of being told I have control over my body when it comes to sex and procreation, but not when it comes to avoiding a painful death.

vankuria

(904 posts)
6. Yes I read the same thing
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 11:41 AM
Nov 2014

Pharmaceutical companies want nothing to do with executions and Dr.'s for obvious reasons will not participate either. That leaves prison officials to concoct their own potions for executions and the results we all know are pretty ugly to say the least.

 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
8. Maybe it has to do with the method of delivery??
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 12:12 PM
Nov 2014

Warden: "Here, take these pills and die."
Inmate: "No."

I don't think there is much way to force pills down someone's throat.

My understanding is that when a lethal injection is done, there are several different apparatuses, which are operated simultaneously by different people. All but one is a "dummy," so that no one knows who actually administers the fatal dose. Maybe it helps some of those people sleep at night, if they can believe they didn't actually kill someone.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
9. Another question
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 12:22 PM
Nov 2014

Why do we allow families to withhold food and water as a form of euthanasia? It's a cruel way to go.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
11. And if they're not?
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 12:35 PM
Nov 2014

And even if they are, why prolong it for up to 2 weeks when we have other far more humane methods?

KinMd

(966 posts)
12. I agree totally , but often the law allows you to withold water and food
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 12:38 PM
Nov 2014

..but won't allow a doctor to prescribe lethal drugs. Our they'll say if the person cannot take the drugs on their own, then it's not suicide

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just wondering about some...