Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 03:41 PM Nov 2014

E-mail points to White House involvement in USDA’s firing of Shirley Sherrod

Source: Washington Post

A 2010 e-mail from Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack says his department was “waiting for the go-ahead” from the White House before accepting the resignation of Shirley Sherrod, according to newly released documents, despite Obama administration assertions that her ouster was Vilsack’s decision alone.

The e-mail, which was made public Friday in an ongoing federal court case over the matter, shed more light on the evening of July 19, 2010, when the USDA hastily asked Sherrod to resign after a video showing her making supposed racist remarks surfaced on a conservative Web site. Her dismissal turned into a racial firestorm after it became clear that the video had been edited and her remarks were meant to tell a story of reconciliation.

Both the White House and Vilsack have repeatedly said that the agriculture secretary made the decision to ask for Sherrod’s resignation without White House input. The e-mails, along with earlier e-mails obtained by the Associated Press under the Freedom of Information Act in 2010 and 2012, make it apparent that Vilsack wanted Sherrod to leave the department and ordered her resignation. But a newly released e-mail sent by Vilsack himself suggests that he was awaiting a decision from White House officials on how to proceed.

... The correspondence is evidence in a federal defamation case that Sherrod filed in 2011 against the late blogger Andrew Breitbart, who posted the video, and his colleague Larry O’Connor. The Justice Department has been pushing to keep the e-mails sealed but lost Friday afternoon when U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon ruled that they did not have to be kept private.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/e-mail-points-to-white-house-involvement-in-usdas-firing-of-shirley-sherrod/2014/11/03/df70188c-63a8-11e4-9fdc-d43b053ecb4d_story.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
E-mail points to White House involvement in USDA’s firing of Shirley Sherrod (Original Post) Newsjock Nov 2014 OP
Anyone who indicates surprise at this revelation Jackpine Radical Nov 2014 #1
K&R woo me with science Nov 2014 #2
Again, "transparency".......when a court orders it and they can't wiggle out. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #3

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. Anyone who indicates surprise at this revelation
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 03:45 PM
Nov 2014

will be inundated by targeted online ads offering to sell them the Brooklyn Bridge and prime real estate in the new Okefenokee Acres residential development.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
3. Again, "transparency".......when a court orders it and they can't wiggle out.
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 04:41 PM
Nov 2014

At least they didn't use the "National Security" con.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»E-mail points to White Ho...