Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 03:49 AM Nov 2014

One reason why we lost in Kansas

A major reason - Democrats simply did not show up to vote.

Looking at my own county. In 2012, the numbers were 16,000 for Romney and 11,000 for Obama.

Now, here's 2014

12,774 for Lynn Stinking Jenkins
5,993 for Democratic challenger.

10,122 for Brownback
8,779 for Davis

10,303 for Roberts
8,468 for the Induhpendent

Democratic candidates for state legislature - 7,708
Republican candidates for state legislature - 11,292

Now split the difference between Jenkins and Roberts it is 2,471. Assume that 1/3 of them are Obama voters voting for Jenkins (probably a huge over-estimate) and 2/3 of them are Romney voters voting for Orman.

that gives an approximate total of 6,817 Obama voters who came to the polls and 11,951 Romney voters. And then I looked up the exact numbers instead of using what I remembered above.

out of 17,058 Romney voters 70% of them came to the polls.
out of 11,358 Obama voters 60% of them came to the polls

78% of Davis voters were Obama voters (the other 22% being Romney voters). Davis lost to Brownback by
390,042 to 422,796.

The difference between 70% and 60% is 16% more participation by Republicans. Increase Davis' Democratic total by 15% and he wins 433,000 to 423,000.

Oh, and Obama got 439,908 votes in 2012, compared to only 423,000 for Brownback this year.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One reason why we lost in Kansas (Original Post) hfojvt Nov 2014 OP
Dems should vote like their life depends on it. Because it does. nt SunSeeker Nov 2014 #1
this countrys voting record MFM008 Nov 2014 #2
Stupid lazy F's sitting on their asses while the country sinks, then they'll say WTF, how did RKP5637 Nov 2014 #3
well, if it was mandatory hfojvt Nov 2014 #6
How the hell did Brown-shirt win? Rhinodawg Nov 2014 #4
Well jamzrockz Nov 2014 #5

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
2. this countrys voting record
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:02 AM
Nov 2014

Is a disgrace. It should be as mandatory as paying taxes. Americans are fat and lazy bastards that need to act under threat of force or fine before they do anything. Now these morons in mostly red states are gonna f**k it up for all of us.

RKP5637

(67,083 posts)
3. Stupid lazy F's sitting on their asses while the country sinks, then they'll say WTF, how did
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:55 AM
Nov 2014

this happen.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
6. well, if it was mandatory
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 11:20 AM
Nov 2014

If 100% of both Romney and Obama voters showed up, Democrats would still lose most races in Kansas.

This year though, if that had happened, (all voters showing up, or at least as many as showed up in 2012 (which was not all)) at least Davis would have won, and probably Orman too.

But it seems like the media spent at least a month saying "Brownback is probably gonna lose" and hearing that, Republican voters got fired up to make sure that didn't happen.

But really, looking at the totals, about 19,000 in my county showed up to vote, which is about the same number as in 2006 when Democratic Governor Kathleen Sebelius was re-elected and Nancy Boyda beat Republican Congressman Jim Ryun (but lost my county by about 9,400 to 9,200).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One reason why we lost in...